Publicado

2014-10-01

Individual Scholar Productivity Rankings in Business Ethics Research

Rankings de productividad académica individual en la investigación sobre ética empresarial

Rankings de produtividade acadêmica individual na pesquisa sobre ética empresarial

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46719

Palabras clave:

Business ethics rankings, business ethics scholars, evolution of the business ethics field, business ethics research contributions. (en)
rankings de ética empresarial, académicos de ética empresarial, evolución del campo de la ética empresarial, contribuciones investigativas a la ética empresarial. (es)
Rankings de ética empresarial, acadêmicos da ética empresarial, evolução do campo da ética empresarial, contribuições para a pesquisa da ética empresarial. (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

  • Benjamin J. Warnick Indiana University
  • Pablo Rodrigo Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
  • Chad O. Albrecht Utah State University
  • Nathaniel M. Stephens Utah State University
The last two decades have been a time of significant development for the academic business ethics community. While a number of scholars have contributed to advances in the field, the work of the individuals who have contributed to its progress and growth through their business ethics research is still not comprehensively understood within the academic business ethics community. This study identifies those individuals who have made major contributions to the business ethics field by ranking authors who have published business ethics-related research in the following six journals over the past 20 years: the Journal of Business Ethics, the Academy of Management Review, the Academy of Management Journal, the Business Ethics Quarterly, the Administrative Science Quarterly; and Business & Society. The results of the study should be of interest to a number of constituencies as they provide the academic business ethics community with a better understanding of the history and evolution of the field and its development towards academic maturity.
Las últimas dos décadas han sido un período de desarrollo significativo para la comunidad académica de ética empresarial. si bien varios académicos han contribuido a avances en el campo, el trabajo de quienes han ayudado a su progreso y crecimiento mediante la investigación sobre ética empresarial todavía no se comprende de manera exhaustiva dentro de su comunidad académica. Este estudio identifica a quienes han realizado contribuciones importantes al campo de la ética empresarial, mediante una clasificación de los autores que han publicado investigaciones relacionadas con esta materia en las siguientes seis revistas durante los últimos veinte anos: Journal of Business Ethics, Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal, Business Ethics Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly y Business & Society. Los resultados del estudio deberían ser del interés de varios grupos, pues le proporcionan a la comunidad académica de ética laboral una mejor comprensión sobre la historia y evolución del campo y sobre su desarrollo hacia la madurez académica.
As últimas duas décadas têm sido um período de desenvolvimento significativo para a comunidade académica da ética empresarial. Embora vários académicos tenham contribuído para avanços no campo, ainda não é entendido de maneira exaustiva dentro da comunidade acadêmica o trabalho daqueles que têm ajudado ao seu progresso e crescimento mediante a pesquisa sobre ética empresarial. Este estudo identifica aqueles que têm realizado contribuições importantes ao campo da ética empresarial mediante una classificação dos autores que tenham publicado pesquisas relacionadas com este assunto nas seguintes seis revistas durante os últimos vinte anos: Journal of Business Ethics, Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management Journal, Business Ethics Quarterly, Administrative Science Quarterly e Business & Society. Os resultados do estudo deveriam ser do interesse de vários grupos, já que proporcionam à comunidade acadêmica de ética trabalhista melhor compreensão sobre a história e evolução do campo e sobre o seu desenvolvimento rumo à maturidade acadêmica.

Referencias

Albrecht, C., Thompson, J.A., Hoopes, J. L., & Rodrigo, P. (2010). Business ethics journal rankings as perceived by business ethics scholars. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 227-237.

Albrecht, C. Thompson, J. A., & Hoopes, J. L. (2011). Productivity and prestige in business ethics research: A report and commentary on the state of the field. Business & Society, 50(4), 580-606.

Bazley, J. D., & Nikolai, L. A. (1975). A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. The Accounting Review, 50(3), 605-610.

Beets, D., Lewis, B., & Brower, H. (forthcoming). The quality of business ethics journals: An assessment based on application. Business & Society.

Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics: A journal through the history, the classics, and the pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499-524.

Certo, S., Sirmon, D. G., & Brymer, R. A. (2010). Competition and scholarly productivity in management: Investigating changes in scholarship from 1988 to 2008. Academy Of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 591-606.

Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: The first 1,500 articles published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1-73.

Cordeiro, W. P. (2003). The only solution to the decline in business ethics: Ethical managers. Teaching Business Ethics, 7(3), 265-277.

De Bakker, F. G. A., Groeneweger, P., & Hond, F. D. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283-317.

De George, R.T. (1987). The status of business ethics: Past and future. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(3), 201-211.

Freeman, R.E. (2000). Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 169-180.

Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51-71.

Heck, J. L., Cooley, P.L., & Hubbard, C. M. (1986). Contributing authors and institutions to the Journal of Finance: 1946-1985. Journal of Finance, 41(5), 1129-1140.

Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1992). The development of measures of faculty scholarship. Group & Organization Management, 17(1), 5-23.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd Ed.). Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.

Lindgren, J., & Seltzer, D. (1996). The most prolific law professors and faculties. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 71, 781-807.

Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Sciences, 16(2), 317-324.

Ma, Z. (2009). The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and Future. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 255-265.

Medoff, M. H. (1996). A citation-based analysis of economics and economics programs. American Economics, 40(1), 46-59.

Morrison, A. J., & Inkpen, A. C. (1991). An analysis of significant contribution to the international business literature. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 143-154.

Paul, K. (2004). Business and society and business ethics journals: A citation and impact analysis. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 35(2), 103-117.

Pao, M. L. (1985). Lotka's law: A testing procedure. Information Processing & Management, 21(4), 305-320.

Pickerd, J., Stephens, N. M., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2011). Individual accounting faculty research rankings by topical area and methodology. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(3), 471-505.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenize, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720.

Preston, L., & O'Bannon, D. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationships. Business and Society, 36, 419-429.

Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 363-375.

Sabrin, M. (2002). A ranking of the most productive business ethics scholars: A five-year study. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(4), 355-379.

Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). A citation-based ranking of the business ethics scholarly journals. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 4(4), 390-399.

Serenko, A., Bontis, N., Booker, L., Sadeddin, K., & Hardie, T. (2010). A sci-entometric analysis of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic literature (1994-2008). Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 3-23.

Serenko, A., Cocosila, M., & Turel, O. (2008). The state and evolution of information systems research in Canada: A scientometric analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25(4), 279-294.

Serenko, A., & Jiao, C. (2012). Investigating information systems research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(1), 3-24.

Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J. S., & Ramakrishnan, T. (2006). Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Quarterly 32(3), 467-482.

Stephens, N. M., Summers, S. L., Williams, B., & Wood, D. A. (2011). Accounting Doctoral Program Rankings Based on Research Productivity of Program Graduates. Accounting Horizons, 25(1), 149-181.

Shane, S. A. (1997). Who is publishing the entrepreneurship research? Journal of Management, 23(1), 83-95.

Wicks, A. C., & Derry, R. (1996). An evaluation of journal quality: The perspective of business ethics researchers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(3), 359-371.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

945

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Warnick, B. J., Rodrigo, P., Albrecht, C. O., & Stephens, N. M. (2014). Rankings de productividad académica individual en la investigación sobre ética empresarial. Innovar, 24(54), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46719

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2014 Innovar

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.

Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.

El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons: