Publicado

2016-10-01

Industrial Ph.D. Programs for the Strengthening of the Industry's Production of Innovation in Colombia

PROGRAMAS DE DOCTORADO EN INDUSTRIA PARA EL FORTALECIMIENTO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN DE INNOVACIÓN INDUSTRIAL EN COLOMBIA

PROGRAMAS DE DOUTORADO EM INDÚSTRIA PARA O FORTALECIMENTO DA PRODUÇÃO DE INOVAÇÃO INDUSTRIAL NA COLÔMBIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n62.59393

Palabras clave:

Higher education, research institutions, innovation, R&D, training (en)
Educación superior, institutos de investigación, innovación, I&D, formación (es)
educação superior, institutos de pesquisa, inovação, P&D, formação (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

Today's firms face a new global economy powered by knowledge rather than physical resources and natural raw materials. Universities are crucial actors in ensuring economic development, not only by training highly qualified human capital, but also by producing new knowledge with innovation potential. University–industry research collaborations (UICs) have been increasingly recognized as an innovation mode. Highly qualified people, mainly at Ph.D. level, are fundamental for the increase of the knowledge pool from which firms and society as a whole can benefit in terms of the production of innovation. The demand for more specialized researchers in business/industry has led to new versions of doctoral programs, such as Industrial Ph.D. Programs (IPPs), which are well-established in a number of countries. After using an analytical international and comparative education methodology, we have found that the cooperation with industry to develop Ph.D. programs in Colombia is relatively weak and requires to be enhanced. In this paper, we argue for the alignment of the so-called third academic mission of economic development with the traditional academic missions of teaching and research through the implementation of IPPs as a mechanism for strengthening the innovation process of firms and country's economic growth.

La empresa actual se enfrenta una nueva economía global estimulada más por el conocimiento que por los recursos físicos y las materias primas de origen natural. En este escenario, las universidades son actores fundamentales para la consolidación del desarrollo económico, no sólo por su labor de formación de capital humano altamente cualificado, sino también por la producción de nuevo conocimiento con potencial innovador. Por ello, la relación universidad-industria es cada vez más reconocida como una forma de innovación en investigación. Profesionales altamente calificados, sobre todo a nivel de doctorado, son fundamentales para la expansión del acervo de conocimientos del cual pueden beneficiarse las empresas y la sociedad en términos de producción de innovación. La demanda de investigadores cada vez más especializados por parte de las empresas y la industria, ha dado lugar a nuevos programas de Doctorado en Industria, los cuales se encuentran ya consolidados en varios países. En este trabajo, luego de emplear una metodología comparativa y analítica en educación internacional, se concluye que la cooperación con el sector industrial para el desarrollo de programas de doctorado en Colombia es relativamente débil y que requiere de intervención. Adicionalmente, se presentan argumentos a favor de la alineación de la llamada "tercera misión académica" para el desarrollo económico con las misiones tradicionales de enseñanza e investigación, a través de la implementación de programas de Doctorado en Industria como mecanismo para el fortalecimiento del proceso de innovación de las empresas y el crecimiento económico del país.

A indústria atual enfrenta uma nova economia global estimulada mais pelo conhecimento do que pelos recursos físicos e as matérias-primas de origem natural. Nesse cenário, as universidades são atores fundamentais para a consolidação do desenvolvimento econômico, não somente por seu trabalho de formação de capital humano altamente qualificado, mas também pela produção de novo conhecimento com potencial inovador. Por isso, a relação universidade-indústria é cada vez mais reconhecida como uma forma de inovação em pesquisa. Profissionais altamente capacitados, principalmente com doutorado, são fundamentais para a expansão do acervo de conhecimentos do qual as empresas e a sociedade podem ser beneficiadas em termos de produção de inovação. A demanda de pesquisadores cada vez mais especializados por parte das empresas e da indústria tem dado lugar a novos programas de doutorado em indústria, os quais se encontram já consolidados em vários países. Neste trabalho, após empregar uma metodologia comparativa e analítica em educação internacional, conclui-se que a cooperação com o setor industrial para o desenvolvimento de programas de doutorado na Colômbia é relativamente fraca e requer intervenção. Além disso, apresentam-se argumentos a favor do alinhamento da chamada "terceira missão acadêmica" para o desenvolvimento econômico com as missões tradicionais de ensino e pesquisa, por meio da implantação de programas de doutorado em indústria como mecanismo para o fortalecimento do processo de inovação das empresas e para o crescimento econômico do país.

Referencias

Acosta, O., & Celis, J. (2014). The emergence of doctoral programmes in the Colombian higher education system: Trends and challenges. Prospects, 44(3), 463-481. doi: 10.1007/s11125-014-9310-5.

Altbach, P. G., Gumport, P. J., & Berdahl, R. O. (Eds.). (2011). American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political and Economic Challenges. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305. doi: 10.1177/1028315307303542.

Amara, N., Landry, R., & Traoré, N. (2008). Managing the protection of innovations in knowledge-intensive business services. Research Policy, 37(9), 1530-1547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/.respol.2008.07.001.

Asmar, P. (2015). MIDE-Colciencias: Dos políticas públicas altamente incoherentes. El Observatorio de la Universidad. Retrieved from: http://www.universidad.edu.co/index.php?option=com_ontent&view=article&id=6058:2015-08-22-14-24-06&catid=36:ensayos-acadcos&Itemid=81.

Auriol, L., Misu, M., & Freeman, R. (2013). Careers of doctorate holders: Analysis of labour market and mobility indicators. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/04. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Auriol, L., Schaaper, M., & Felix, B. (2012). Mapping careers and mobility of doctorate holders: Draft guidelines, model questionnaire and indicators - Third Edition. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2012/07. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., & Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002.

Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effec-tiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008.

Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2013). Models and Methods of University Technology Tranfer. Boston: Now Publishers Incorporated.

Bray, M. (2007). Actors and Purposes in Comparative Education. In Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.). Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods. The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.

Bray, M. (2014). Understanding International and Comparative Education Research. In Reid, A. D., Hart, E. P. & Peters, M. A. (Eds.), A Companion to Research in Education. The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.

Brécard, D., Fougeyrollas, A., Le Mouél, P., Lemiale, L., & Zagamé, P. (2006). Macro-economic consequences of European research policy: Prospects ofthe Nemesis model in the year 2030. Research Policy, 35(7), 910-924. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.001.

Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Re-search Policy, 39(7), 858-868. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006.

Burnside, B., & Witkin, L. (2008). Forging successful university-industry collaborations. Research Technology Management, 51 (2), 26-30.

Bush, V. (1945). Science: The Endless Frontier. U.S. Office of Scientific Research and Development, Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Cárdenas, J. H. (2007). Articulación Universidad-Empresa-Estado (AUEE): Importancia del recurso humano y su impacto en la innovación y el desarrollo tecnológico. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Casey, B. (2009). The economic contribution of PhDs. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 219-227.

Celis, J., Duque, M., & Ramírez, C. (2012). Doctorados en ingeniería para promover la innovación: una propuesta para acrecentar la competitividad empresarial basada en la inserción de doctores en ingeniería en Colombia. Bogotá: ACOFI & Uni Andes.

Clark, B. R. (1997). The modern integration of research activities with teaching and learning. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 241-255.

Clavijo, S., Vera, A., & Fandiño, A. (2012). La desindustrialización en Colombia. Análisis cuantitativo de sus determinantes. Retrieved from: http://anif.co/sites/default/files/uploads/Anif-Desindustrializacion-12.pdf.

Conlon, G., & Patrignani, P. (2011). The Returns to Higher Education Qua-lifications. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32419/11-973-returns-to-higher-education-qualifications.pdf.

Crespi, G., Maffioli, A., & Melendez, M. (2011). Public Support to Innovation: the Colombian Colciencias' Experience. New York: Inter-American Development Bank.

Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Mohammed, Y. (2011). The PhD factory. Nature, 472, 276-279. DANE. (2016). Pobreza monetaria y multidimensional - 2075. Retrieved from: http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/esp/estadisticas-sociales/pobreza/87-sociales/calidad-de-vida/6507-pobreza-mo-netaria-y-multidimensional-2015.

DCTI. (2007). The Industrial Ph.D. - An effective tool for innovation and knowledge sharing. Copenhagen: The danish council for techno-logy and innovation. De Vries, R. (2014). Earning by Degrees Differences in the career outcomes of UK graduates. Improving social mobility through education. Retrieved from: http://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Earnings-by-Degrees-REPORT.pdf.

Deakins, D., & Freel, M. (2003). Entrepreneurship in Small Firms. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education. EC (2001). Building an Innovative Economy in Europe, a Review of 72 Studies of Innovation Policy and Practice in Today's Europe. Re-trieved from: https://cordis.europa.eu/pub/innovation-policy/studies/building_2001_full_text.pdf.

Edwards, S. (2009). A professional practice-based doctorate: Develo-ping advanced nursing practice. Nurse Education Today, 29(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.11.006.

El Espectador (8 de abril de 2015). Universidad de Antioquia cambiará examen de admisión. El Espectador. Retrieved from: http://www.elespectador.com/noticias/educacion/universidad-de-antioquia-cambiara-examen-de-admision-articulo-553702.

Enders, J. (2004). Research training and careers in transition: A Euro-pean perspective on the many faces of the Ph.D. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(3), 419-429.

Enders, J., de Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: the reform of higher education revisited. Higher Education, 65(1), 5-23. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9578-4.

Epstein, E. H. (1994). Comparative and International Education: Over-view and Historical Development. In: Husén, T., & Postlethwaite, T. N. (Eds.). The International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

Erawacht (2012). Company Graduate Schools. European Commission's information platform on European, national and regional re-search and innovation systems and policies. Retrieved from: http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/erawatch/opencms/information/country_pages/se/supportmeasure/support_mig_0043?tab=template&avan_type=support&country=se.

Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cog-nitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Re-search Policy, 27(8), 823-833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6.

Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. London, UK: Routledge. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2001). Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Gover-nment Relations. London: Continuum.

Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325-348. doi: 10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5.

Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93-114. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2.

Gibbson, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (2006). The New Production of Knowledge, the Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

Godin, B. (2005). The Linear Model of Innovation: The Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework. Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics. Working Paper No. 30x.

Gómez, A. (2015). Formación doctoral en el Sistema Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Colombia. Informe presentado a Colciencias. Documento de circulación interna. Bogotá: Colciencias & Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Gómez, H., & Mitchell, D. (2014). Innovación y empredimiento en Colombia: balance, perspectivas y recomendaciones de política, 2074-2078. Bogotá: Fedesarrollo.

González, F. (19 de agosto de 2014). En patentes de invención, Colombia no despega. El Tiempo. Retrieved from: http://www.eltiempo.com/economia/sectores/petentes-en-colombia/14405172.

González-Velosa, C., Rucci, G., Sarzosa, M., & Urzúa, S. (2015). 2015. Returns to Higher Education in Chile and Colombia. Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-587. Washington D. C., USA: Inter-American Development Bank

Greenaway, D., & Haynes, M. (2003). Funding higher education in the UK: The role of fees and loans. Economic Journal, 773, F150-F166.

Harman, G. (2002). Producing PhD Graduates in Australia for the Knowledge Economy. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(2), 179-190.

Heinzl, J., Kor, A. L., Orange, G., & Kaufmann, H. (2013). Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(5), 607-640. doi: 10.1007/s10961-012-9258-7.

Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. (2014). Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university-industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea. Technovation, 34(10), 605-616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.006.

Héraud, J. A., & Lévy, R. (2005). University-Industry Relationships and Re-gional Innovation Systems: Analysis of the French Procedure Cifre. In: Llerena, P. & Matt, M. (Eds.). Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based EconomyK. The Netherlands: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Inzelt, A. (2004). The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 975-995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.002.

Janis, F. T. (2003). Technology Transfer Emerging Issues "High Impact Trends". The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3), 241-249. doi: 10.1023/a:1024936710657.

Kaur, J., Singh, N., Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. (2010). The impact of economic policy on reshaping higher education in Malaysia. In: Devlin, J., Nagy, J., & Lichtenberg, A. (Eds.). Research and Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education. Mel-bourne: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Kaur, J., Sirat, M., & Azman, N. (2008). The scenario of internationlisation and globalisation of higher education in Malaysia. In: Kaur, J., Sirat, M., & Azman, N. (Eds.). Globalisation and internationlisation of higher education in Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Kehm, B. M. (2007). Quo Vadis Doctoral Education? New european ap-proaches in the context of global changes. European Journal of Education, 42(3), 307-319. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00 308.x.

Kerr, C. I., & Ivey, P. C. (2003). The Engineering Doctorate model of consultant/researcher/innovator/entrepreneur for new product development - a gas turbine instrumentation case study. Technovation, 23, 95-102.

Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J. S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Techno-logy transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431-449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.008.

Levidow, L. (2002). Marketizing higher education: neoliberal strategies and counter-strategies. In: Robins, K., & Webster, F. (Eds.). The Virtual University? Knowledge, Markets and Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Lucio, J. (Ed.) (2014). Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología Colombia 2073. Bogotá: Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología. Lucio, R., & Serrano, M. (1992). Tendencias y políticas estatales. Bogotá: IEPRI- Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Luo, X. R., Koput, K. W., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Intellectual capital or signal? The effects of scientists on alliance formation in knowledge-intensive industries. Research Policy, 38(8), 1313-1325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.001.

Macho-Stadler, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D., & Veugelers, R. (2008). Designing Con-tracts for University Spin-offs. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 77(1), 185-218. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2008.00175.x.

MEN (2014). Decree on salary of faculty and administrative staff ofpublic universities. Presidential decree no. 773 of 2074. Retrieved from: http://wsp.presidencia.gov.co/Normativa/Decretos/2014/Documents/FEBRERO/07/DECRETO173DEL07DEFEBRERODE2014.pdf.

MEN-SNIES (2015). Estadísticas de Educación Superior. Retrieved from: http://www.mineducacion.gov.co/sistemasdeinformacion/1735/articles-212350_Estadisticas_de_Educacion_Superior_.pdf.

Mora-Valentin, E. M., Montoro-Sanchez, A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2004). Determining factors in the success of R&D coopera-tive agreements between firms and research organizations. Research Policy, 33(1), 17-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00087-8.

MSTI (2006). A Public Good PhD Education in Denmark. Report from an International Evaluation Panel. Retrieved from: http://ufm.dk/en/publications/2006/files-2006/a-public-good-phd-edu-cation-in-denmark.pdf.

Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepre-neurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499-1508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023.

NPD (2015). National Plan of Development. Law no. 7753 of 2075. Bogotá: National Congress. Bogotá: National Congress of Colombia.

NSB (1998). The Federal Role in Science and Engineering Graduate and Postdoctoral Education. NSB 97-235. Arlington, VA: National Science Board. NSF (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators 2074. Science and Engineering Labor Force. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/chapter-3/chapter-3.pdf.

O'Leary, N. C., & Sloane, P. J. (2005). The Return to a University Education in Great Britain. National Institute Economic Review, 793(1), 75-89. doi: 10.1177/0027950105058559.

Obayashia, M., & Yamada, S. (2008). Evaluation of SMEs Innovativeness Using Patent Stock Variables. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 7 (2), 221-229.

OCYT (2014). Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología, Colombia 2073. Bogotá: Observatorio Colombiano de Ciencia y Tecnología.

OECD (2006). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2006. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (2014). OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy. Colombia 2074. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD, & WB (2009). Reviews of National Policies for Education. Tertiary Education in Chile. Santiago: OECD/WB.

OECD, & WB (2012). Reviews of National Policies for Education. Tertiary Education in Colombia. Bogotá: OECD/WB.

OLE (2013). Perfil académico y condiciones de empleabilidad: Graduados de educación superior (2007 - 2072) y certificados de educación para el trabajo y el desarrollo humano (2070-2072). Retrieved from: http://www.graduadoscolombia.edu.co/html/1732/articles-195072_perfil_2013.pdf.

Olsen, J. P. (2009). Democratic government, institutional autonomy and the dynamics of change. Oslo: ARENA working papers, 01.

Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1.

Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O'Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). The entrepre-neurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation, 37(4), 161-170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.003.

Ramírez-Salazar, M. P., & García-Valderrama, M. (2010). La Alianza Uni-versidad-Empresa-Estado: una estrategia para promover innova-ción. Revista EAN, 68, 112-133.

Reisman, A. (2005). Transfer of technologies: a cross-disciplinary taxonomy. Omega, 33(3), 189-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.004.

RICYT (2015). Graduados en educación superior. Doctorados. Indicadores. Argentina: RICYT.

Rip, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems and the Advent of Strategic Science. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 123-131. doi: 10.1023/A:1013108906611.

Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists' academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy, 39, 422-434.

Romer, P. M. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3-22.

Russ, M. (2014). Value Creation, Reporting, and Signaling for Human Capital and Human Assets: Building the Foundation for a Multi-disciplinary, Multi-level Theory. Building the Foundation for a Multi-Disciplinary, Multi-Level Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Salminen-Karlsson, M., & Wallgren, L. (2008). The interaction of academic and industrial supervisors in graduate education. An investigation of industrial research schools. Higher Education, 56, 77-93.

Schwartzman, S. (2007). Brazil's Leading University. Original Ideals and Contemporary Goals. In: Philip, A., & Balán, J. (Eds.). Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America World Calss Worldwide. The United States of America: The Johns Hop-kins University Press.

SCimago (2014a). Country Rankings. Retrieved from: http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?area=0&category=0&region=all&year=2014&order=it&min=0&min_type=it.

SCimago (2014b). Country rankings. SJR: SCImago journal and country rank. Retrieved from: http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.ph.p?area=0&category=0&region=all&year=2014&order=it&min=0&min_type=it.

SIC (2015). Base de Datos. Centro de Information Tecnológico y de Apoyo a la Gestión de la Propiedad Intelectual. Retrieved from: http://www.sic.gov.co/drupal/recursos_user/estadisticas/universidades/web/StatTrends_offline_IE_security_bypass.html.

SRC (2016). Academic Ranking of World Universities 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2015.html.

Steingraber, R., & Gonçalves, F. (2010). The university-industry relationship in Brazil: the impact of institutions and social capital in Brazilian's sectoral system of innovation. Paper presented at the VIII Triple Helix Conference, 2010, Madrid. Anals of the VIII Triple Helix Con-ference. Retrieved from: http://www.leydesdorff.net/th8/TRIPLE.HELIX-VIIICONFERENCE/PROCEEDINGS/0099_Steingraber_Ronivaldo_O-062/University-industry_relationship_in_Brazil.pdf.

Stiglitz, J. (1975). The Theory of "Screening," Education, and the Distri-bution of Income. The American Economic Review, 65(3), 283-300.

The Chronicle of Higher Education (2014). 2013-14 AAUP Faculty salary survey. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/article/2013-14-AAUP-Faculty-Salary/145679-id=table.

Thune, T. (2009). Doctoral students on the university-industry inter-face: a review of the literature. Higher Education, 58, 637-651.

Thune, T. (2010). The training of "triple Helix workers"? Doctoral students in University-Industry-Goverment Collaborations. Minerva, 48, 463-483.

Thune, T., & B0ring, P. (2014). Industry PhD Schemes: Developing Inno-vation Competencies in Firms? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s13132-014-0214-7.

Thurgood, L., Golladay, M. J., & Hill, S. T. (2006). U.S. Doctorates in the 20th Century. Special Report. USA: National Science Foundation.

Tiraboschi, M. (2014). Industrial PhDs, Research Apprenticeships, and On-the-job training: The Case of Italy from a Comparative and In-ternational Perspective. Retrieved from: http://www.bollettinoadapt.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/wp_2014_159.pdf.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2015). 2075 Po-verty guideline. Retrieved from: https://aspe.hhs.gov/prior-hhs-poverty-guidelines-and-federal-register-references.

UNIANDES (2014). Bienvenido a la Universidad de los Andes. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes. Universities UK. (2007). The economic benefit of a degree (Research report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers). Retrieved from: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2007/the-economic-benefits-of-a-degree.pdf.

Van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and mana-gement challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001.

Velázquez, R. (2009). Las relaciones Universidad-Empresa-Estado. Una reflexión sobre la experiencia antioqueña. Paper presented at the Cátedra Low Maus. Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. WB (2007). The Road Not Traveled Education Reform in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. WB (2012). Researchers in R&D (per million people). Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.SCIE.RD.P6.

WB (2015). Patent applications, residents. Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IP.PAT.RESD.

Yaisawarng, S., & Chu, Y. (2014). The impact of higher education reform on research performance of Chinese universities. China Economic Review, 37 , 94-105.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

1490

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Celis, J., & Acosta, O. (2016). PROGRAMAS DE DOCTORADO EN INDUSTRIA PARA EL FORTALECIMIENTO DE LA PRODUCCIÓN DE INNOVACIÓN INDUSTRIAL EN COLOMBIA. Innovar, 26(62), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n62.59393

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2016 Innovar

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.

Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.

El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons: