Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Sucessão intergeracional e inovação em empresas familiares: revisão de literatura
Intergenerational succession and innovation in family businesses: a literature review
Sucesión intergeracional e innovación en empresas familiares: revisión de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n77.87426Palabras clave:
empresa familiar, inovação, literatura, sucessão intergeracional (pt)empresa familiar, innovación, literatura, sucesión intergeneracional (es)
Family business, innovation, intergenerational succession, literature. (en)
Descargas
Entre as características que diferenciam as empresas familiares das não familiares, está a sucessão, o que indica uma necessidade maior de inovação em função da continuidade dos ne- gócios da família. O objetivo deste estudo foi mapear a produção científica em relação à inovação e sucessão intergeracional em empresa familiar. Por meio da revisão de literatura nos bancos de dados Scopus, Science Direct e Web of Science, foram selecionados quatro artigos, revisados por pares, relacionados com a temática, a partir dos termos “innovat*”, “succession”, “family” nos cam- pos “título”, “resumo” e “palavras-chave” dos referidos bancos de dados. A busca compreendeu a produção científica publicada em periódicos científicos até fevereiro de 2018. Foram considerados artigos científicos na língua inglesa. Como resultado, percebeu-se a falta de uma visão abrangente na literatura científica sobre o tema “sucessão e inovação em empresa familiar”. A principal conclu- são do estudo é a de que o processo de sucessão está associado positiva ou negativamente com a inovação em função de fatores contextuais e do envolvimento familiar. Com base na triangulação dos estudos selecionados, apresentam-se sugestões para as futuras pesquisas que considerem a sucessão e a inovação no contexto de empresas familiares.
Intergenerational succession is among the characteristics that differentiate family businesses from non-family firms. This feature poses a great need for innovation in order to ensure the continuity of this type of organizations. The goal of this study is to map-out the scientific production on innovation and the intergenerational succession of family businesses. Through a review of the available literature in Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases, four peer-reviewed papers on the subject were chosen based on the terms “innovat ”, “succession” and “family” in the fields “title”, “abstract” and “keywords.” The search covered the scientific production published in English until February 2018. As a result, we iden- tified the lack of a comprehensive vision of intergenerational succession and innovation in family businesses in the literature. The main conclusion of this study is that the succession process could be positively or nega- tively associated with innovation, depending on contextual factors and family participation. Based on the triangulation of the selected studies, we present some suggestions for future research on the field.
Entre las características que distinguen las empresas familiares de las no familiares está la sucesión intergeneracional, lo que indica la necesidad de más innovación debido a la continuidad de los negocios familiares. El objetivo del estudio consistió en mapear la producción científica en relación con la innovación y la sucesión intergeneracional de la empresa familiar. Por medio de la revisión de la literatura en las bases de datos Scopus, Science Direct y Web of Science, se seleccionaron cuatro artículos, revisados por especialistas, relacionados con la temática, desde los términos “in- novat*”, “succession”, “family” en los campos “título”, “resumen” y “palabras clave” de dichas bases de datos. La búsqueda abarcó la producción cientí- fica publicada en lengua inglesa hasta febrero del 2018. Como resultado, se demostró la falta de una visión integral en la literatura científica sobre el tema de la sucesión intergeneracional y la innovación en la empresa familiar. La principal conclusión del estudio es que el proceso de sucesión está aso- ciado positiva o negativamente con la innovación en función de los factores contextuales y la participación familiar. Con base en la triangulación de los estudios seleccionados, se plantean algunas sugerencias a las futuras investigaciones que lleven en cuenta la sucesión y la innovación en el contexto de empresas familiares.
Referencias
Au, K., Chiang, F. F., Birtch, T. A. e Ding, Z. (2013). Incubating the next generation to venture: The case of a family business in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 749-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9331-7
Baregheh, A., Rowley, J. e Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management decision, 47(8), 1323- 1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578
Bergfeld, M. M. H., Weber, F. M. e Kraus, S. (2009). Innovationsverhalten und erformance in familienunternehmen: Durch gene-rationenübergreifende Innovation zum Großunternehmen. zfke — Zeitschrift für kmu und Entrepreneurship, 57(1), 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/zfke.57.1.1
Berrone, P., Cruz, C. e Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Bessant, J., Lamming, R., Noke, H. e Phillips, W. (2005). Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation, 25(12), 1366-1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.04.007
Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F. e Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00829.x
Brines, S., Shepherd, D. e Woods, C. (2013). sme family business innovation: Exploring new combinations. Journal of Family Business Management, 3(2), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-01-2012-0002
Carnes, C. M. e Ireland, R. D. (2013). Familiness and innovation: resource bundling as the missing link. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1399-1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12073
Cabrera-Suárez, K. (2005). Leadership transfer and the successor's development in the family firm. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.010
Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P. e García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
Cassia, L., De Massis, A. e Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior e Research, 18(2), 198-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211204229
Chirico, F. (2008). Knowledge accumulation in family firms: Evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal, 26(4), 433-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242608091173
Chrisman, J. J. e Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in red investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976- 997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F. e Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J. e Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(4), 19- 39. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300402
Craig, J. e Dibrell, C. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19(4), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00075.x
Crossan, M. M. e Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
Cruz, C. e Nordqvist, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 33-49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41410000
Damanpour, F. e Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of "organizational lag". Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393031
Damanpour, F. (1988). Innovation type, radicalness, and the adoption process. Communication Research, 15(5), 545-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005003
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406
Damanpour, F. e Aravind, D. (2011). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 423-454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x
Damanpour, F. e Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17(3), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M. e Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
Daspit, J. J., Holt, D. T., Chrisman, J. J. e Long, R. G. (2015). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1), 44- 64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515599688
De Massis, A., Chua, J. H. e Chrisman, J. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra‐family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
De Massis, A., Frattini, F. e Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512466258
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Chua, J. H. e Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family‐oriented particu-laristic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12102
Duh, M. (2014). Family business succession as knowledge creation process. Kybernetes, 43(5), 699-714. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2013-0172
Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M. e Zellweger, T. (2015). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
Filser, M., Brem, A., Gast, J., Kraus, S. e Calabrò, A. (2016). Innovation in Family Firms — Examining the inventory and mapping the path. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(6), 1650054- 1-1650054-39. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919616500547
Frank, H., Kessler, A., Rusch, T., Suess‐Reyes, J. e Weismeier‐Sammer, D. (2016). Capturing the familiness of family businesses: De-velopment of the family influence familiness scale (fifs). Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 709-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12229
Fuetsch, E. e Suess-Reyes, J. (2017). Research on innovation in family businesses: Are we building an ivory tower? Journal of Family Business Management, 7(1), 44-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2016-0003
García‐Álvarez, E. e López‐Sintas, J. (2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14(3), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00209.x
García-Álvarez, E., López-Sintas, J. e Saldaña Gonzalvo, P. (2002). Socialization patterns of successors in first-to second-generation family businesses. Family Business Review, 15(3), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00189.x
Gopalakrishnan, S. e Damanpour, F. (1997). A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, 25(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00043-6
Gudmundson, D., Tower, C. B. e Hartman, E. A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1-17.
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K. e Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014
Habbershon, T. G. e Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x
Handler, W. C. (1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. Family Business Review, 7(2), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1994.00133.x
Hauck, J. e Prügl, R. (2015). Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.11.002
Ingram, A. E., Lewis, M. W., Barton, S. e Gartner, W. B. (2016). Paradoxes and innovation in family firms: The role of paradoxical thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12113
Ip, B. e Jacobs, G. (2006). Business succession planning: A review of the evidence. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(3), 326-350 https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000610680235
Kammerlander, N., Dessi, C., Bird, M., Floris, M. e Murru, A. (2015). The impact of shared stories on family firm innovation: A multicase study. Family Business Review, 28(4), 332-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486515607777
Kraus, S., Pohjola, M. e Koponen, A. (2012). Innovation in family firms: An empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Review of Managerial Science, 6(3), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-011-0065-6
Kotlar, J. e De Massis, A. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to familycentered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263-1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065
Lansberg, I. (1988). The succession conspiracy. Family Business Review, 1(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1988.00119.x
Le Breton-Miller, I. L., Miller, D. e Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective fob succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
Letonja, M. e Duh, M. (2016). Knowledge transfer in family businesses and its effects on the innovativeness of the next family generation. Knowledge Management Research e Practice, 14(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.25
Letonja, M., Jeraj, M. e Maric, M. (2016). An empirical study of the relationship between entrepreneurial competences and innovativeness of successors in family smes. Organizacija, 49(4), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2016-0020
Litz, R. A. e Kleysen, R. F. (2001). Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review, 14(4), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00335.x
Long, R. G. e Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Management succession in family business. Em L. Melin, M. Nordqvist e P. Sharma (eds.), Sage Handbook of Family Business (pp. 249-268). Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Nordqvist, M., Wennberg, K. e Hellerstedt, K. (2013). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1087-1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9466-4
Röd, I. (2016). Disentangling the family firm's innovation process: A systematic review. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.08.004
Rondi, E., De Massis, A. e Kotlar, J. (2018). Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001
Salvato, C. e Corbetta, G. (2013). Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors' leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26, 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513490796
Salvato, C. (2004). Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. The Journal of Private Equity, 7(3), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2004.412339
Sardeshmukh, S. R. e Corbett, A. C. (2011). The duality of internal and external development of successors: Opportunity recognition in family firms. Family Business Review, 24, 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510391783
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J. e Chua, J. H. (2003). Succession planning as planned behavior: Some empirical results. Family Business Review, 16(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2003.00001.x
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J. e Gersick, K. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512437626
Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1),1-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2391646
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. e Pavitt, K. (2008). Gestão da inovação (3ª ed.). São Paulo: Artmed.
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
Ward, J. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weismeier-Sammer, D., Frank, H. e von Schlippe, A. (2013). Untangling "familiness": A literature review and directions for future research. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14(3), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2013.0119
Weismeier-Sammer, D. (2014). The role of familiness for family business innovativeness. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6(2), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2014.062747
West, M. A. e Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
Yu, A., Lumpkin, G. T., Sorenson, R. L. e Brigham, K. H. (2012). The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables. Family Business Review, 25(1), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511430329
Zahra, S. A. e Covin, J. G. (1994). The financial implications of fit between competitive strategy and innovation types and sources. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 5(2), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(94)90002-7
Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J. e Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family ceos: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851-868. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
Zellweger, T. M. e Sieger, P. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in longlived family firms. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9267-6
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Asael Islas-Moreno, Manrrubio Muñoz-Rodríguez, Wyn Morris. (2023). Intergenerational Interaction and Change Management in Agricultural Family Businesses: An Analysis from the Rational, Emotional, and Contextual Dimensions. Innovar, 34(91) https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n91.101682.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
