Um “Mapa Estratégico” para o Marketing
A “Strategic Map” for marketing
Un “mapa estratégico” para el marketing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n77.87431Palabras clave:
balanced scorecard, marketing, métricas, performance, PLS (Partial Least Squares) (pt)Balanced Scorecard, marketing, métricas, performance, mínimos cuadrados parciales (es)
Balanced Scorecard, marketing, metrics, performance, Partial Least Squares (PLS). (en)
Descargas
A avaliação da performance de marketing é um tema vital em muitas empresas. Nesse contexto, uma questão fundamental consiste em como conceptualizar e operacionalizar, com rigor, os instrumentos que conduzam a formas mais holísticas e equilibradas de avaliar a performance de marketing, não apenas para efeitos de monitorização e melhoria, mas também para comunicar estratégias. Infelizmente, apesar da existência de um número crescente de métricas individualizadas, os estudos de modelização do fenómeno apresentados na literatura são escassos e a grande maioria não é suportada empiricamente. O presente trabalho desenvolve e testa um modelo integrado de avaliação da performance de marketing baseado na filosofia e nos princípios do Balanced Scorecard. Os dados foram obtidos através de um questionário respondido por 107 empresas portuguesas. Os resultados, analisados com base no método de equações estruturais, confirmam a robustez teórica do modelo e sugerem a sua viabilidade para avaliar a atuação de marketing. Nesse sentido, este estudo constitui um aprofundamento da temática em causa e fornece um instrumento destinado a orientar a seleção de um conjunto relevante de indicadores que auxilie as empresas a basearem análises de tipo avaliativo e decisões sobre alocação de recursos.
The evaluation of marketing performance has been a major concern for organizations and remains a vital issue in many companies. A central question in this context is how to rigorously conceptualize and operationalize instruments that lead to more holistic and balanced ways of evaluating marketing performance, not only for monitoring and improvement purposes but also for communicating strategies. Unfortunately, despite the existence of an increasing number of individual metrics, studies on the modeling of this phenomenon presented in the literature are scarce. Furthermore, most of these works are not supported empirically. This work develops and tests an integrated marketing performance evaluation model based on the philosophy and principles of the Balanced Scorecard. The data was obtained through a survey completed by 107 Portuguese companies. The results, examined by the structural equation method, confirm the theoretical robustness of the model and suggest its feasibility for evaluating marketing performance. Therefore, this study broadens the understanding of the subject and provides a tool to guide the selection of a relevant set of indicators for companies to carry out evaluation analysis and strengthen decision-making in the allocation of resources.
La evaluación del rendimiento de marketing ha constituido una preocupación importante y sigue siendo un tema vital en muchas empresas. Una cuestión fundamental, en este contexto, es cómo conceptualizar y operacionalizar con rigor los instrumentos que conduzcan a maneras más holísticas y equilibradas de evaluar la performance de marketing, no solo para efectos de monitoreo y mejora, sino también para comunicar estrategias. Desafortunadamente, a pesar de la existencia de un número creciente de métricas individuales, los estudios de modelización del fenómeno presentados en la literatura son escasos y la gran mayoría no es soportada empíricamente. El presente trabajo desarrolla y prueba un modelo integrado de evaluación de la performance de marketing basado en la filosofía y los principios del Balanced Scorecard. Los datos se obtuvieran por medio de una encuesta contestada por 107 empresas portuguesas. Los resultados, analizados mediante el método de ecuaciones estructurales, confirman la robustez teórica del modelo y sugieren su viabilidad para evaluar la actuación de marketing. Por lo tanto, este estudio constituye una profundización de la temática en cuestión y proporciona una herramienta para guiar la selección de un conjunto relevante de indicadores que ayude a las empresas a basar análisis de tipo evaluativo y decisiones sobre la asignación de recursos.
Referencias
Ambler, T., Kokkinaki, F. e Puntoni, S. (2004). Assessing marketing performance: Reasons for metrics selection. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(3), 475-498. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725704323080506
Ambler, T. e Roberts, J. H. (2008). Assessing marketing performance: Don't settle for a silver metric. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(7-8), 733-750. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X345498
American Marketing Association [ama] (2013). Definition of Marketing. https://www.ama.org/AboutAMA/Pages/Definition-of-Marketing.aspx
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C. e Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800304
Atman, M. B., Heerde, H. J. V. e Mela, C. F. (2010). The long-term effect of marketing strategy on brand sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 866-882. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.5.866
Bernhardt, K. L., Donthu, N. e Kennett, P. A. (2000). A Longitudinal analysis of satisfaction and profitability. Journal of Business Research, 47(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00042-3
Cacciolatti, L. e Lee, S. H. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between marketing capabilities and firm performance: The moderating role of market orientation, marketing strategy and organisational power. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5597-5610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.067
Cravens, D. W., Piercy, N. F. e Baldauf, A. (2009). Management framework guiding strategic thinking in rapidly changing markets. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(1-2), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725709X410025
Desphandé, R. e Farley, J. U. (1998). Measuring market orientation: Generalization and synthesis. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 2(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009719615327
Doyle, J. e Armenakyan, A. (2014). Value-creating mechanisms within the market orientation performance relationship: A metaanalysis. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(3), 93-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2013.876073
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B. e Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172866
Farris, P. W., Bendle, N. T., Pfeifer, P. E. e Reibstein, D. J. (2017). Key marketing metrics: The 50+ metrics every manager needs to know. Harlow, UK: FT Publishing International.
Farris, P. W., Hanssens, D. M., Lenskold, J. D. e Reibstein, D. J. (2015). Marketing return on investment: Seeking clarity for concept and measurement. Applied Marketing Analytics, 1(3), 267-282. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/ama/2015/00000001/00000003/art00010
Frösén, J., Luoma, J., Jaakkola, M., Tikkanen, H. e Aspara, J. (2016). What counts versus what can be counted: The complex interplay of market orientation and marketing performance measurement. Journal of Marketing, 80(3), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0153
Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression e structural equation models. Asheboro, usa: Statistical Associates Publishing.
Gebhardt, G. F., Carpenter, G. S. e Sherry, J. F. (2006). Creating a market orientation: A longitudinal, multifirm, grounded analysis of cultural transformation. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.37
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. e Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (pls-sem) (2a ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hanssens, D. M. e Pauwels, K. H. (2016). Demonstrating the value of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0417
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. e Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Homburg, C., Artz, M. e Wieseke, J. (2012). Marketing performance measurement systems: Does comprehensiveness really improve performance? Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.09.0487
Homburg, C. e Pflesser, C. (2000). A multiple layer model of marketoriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.4.449.18786
Homburg, C., Vomberg, A., Enke, M. e Grimm, P. H. (2015). The loss of the marketing department's influence: Is it really happening? And why worry? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0416-3
Hu, B., Leopold-Wildburgerb, U. e Strohhecker, J. (2017). Strategy map concepts in a balanced scorecard cockpit improve performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 664-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.026
Hunt, S. D. e Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900201
Ittner, C. D. e Larcker, D. F. (2003). Coming up short on non financial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 81(11), 88–95.
Jaakkola, M., Moller, K., Parvinen, P., Evanschitzky, H. e Muhlbacher, H. (2010). Strategic marketing and business performance: A study in three European "engineering countries". Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1300-1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.005
Kaplan, R. S. e Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard — Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kaplan, R. S. e Norton, D. P. (2000). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 167-176.
Katsikeas, C. S., Morgan, N. A., Leonidou, L. C. e Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Assessing performance outcomes in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0287
Kirca, A.H., Jayachandran, S. e Bearden, W.O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761
Kohli, A. K. e Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation — The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201
Kosan, L. (2014). Accounting for marketing: marketing performance through financial results. International Review of Management and Marketing, 4(4), 276-283. http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/955/pdf
Kumar, V. (2015). Evolution of marketing as a discipline: What has happened and what to look out for. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.79.1.1
Kumar, V. e Reinartz, W. (2016). Creating enduring customer value. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 36-68. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0414
Llach, J., Bagur, L., Perramon, J. e Marimon, F. (2017). Creating value through the balanced scorecard: How does it work? Management Decision, 55(10), 2181-2199. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0812
Lamberti, L. e Noci, G. (2010). Marketing strategy and marketing performance measurement system: Exploring the relationship. European Management Journal, 28(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.007
LaRose, R. e Tsai, H. S. (2014). Completion rates and non-response error in online surveys: Comparing sweepstakes and pre-paid cash incentives in studies of online behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.017
Leroi-Werelds, S., Streukens, S., Brady, M. e Swinnen, G. (2014). Assessing the value of commonly used methods for measuring customer value: A multi-setting empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(4), 430-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0363-4
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research — An Applied Orientation (6a ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.
Mathwick C., Malhotra N. K. e Rigdon E. (2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00045-2
Mintz, O. e Currim, I. S. (2013). What drives managerial use of marketing and financial metrics and does metric use affect performance of marketing-mix activities? Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0463
Morgan, N. A., Clark, B. H. e Gooner, R. (2002). Marketing productivity, marketing audits, and systems for marketing performance assessment: Integrating multiple perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 55(5), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-963(00)00162-4
Narver, J. C. e Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400403
Ngo, L. V. e O'Cass, A. (2012). Performance implications of market orientation, marketing resources, and marketing capabilities. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1-2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.621443
O'Cass, A., Ngo, L. V. e Siahtiri, V. (2015). Marketing resource-capability complementarity and firm performance in b2b firms. Journal of Business e Industrial Marketing, 30(2), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2012-0087
Pimenta da Gama, A. (2011). An expanded model of marketing performance. Marketing Intelligence e Planning, 29(7), 643-661. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501111178677
Pimenta da Gama, A. (2017). A balanced scorecard for marketing. Int. J. Business Performance Management, 18(4), 476-494. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2017.087116
Ramaseshan, B., Ishak, A. e Kingshott, R. P. J. (2013). Interactive effects of marketing strategy formulation and implementation upon firm performance. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11-12), 1224-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.796319
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. e Becker, J.-M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Boenningstedt: Smartpls GMBH. Recuperado de www.smartpls.com
Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V. e Srivastava, R. K. (2004). Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.76.42721
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R. e Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. e Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Em C. Homburg, M. Klarmann e A. Vomberg (eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1-40). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
Slater, S. F. e Olson, E. M. (2001). Marketing's contribution to the implementation of business strategy: An empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 22(11), 1055-1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.198
Slotegraaf, R. J., Moorman, C. e Inman, J. J. (2003). The role of firm resources in returns to market deployment. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 295-309. Recuperado de https://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~moorman/Publications/JMR2003Deployment.pdf
Sridhar, S., Prasad, P.A. e Kelkar, A. (2017), Metrics unreliability and marketing overspending. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(4), 761-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.09.001
Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A. e Fahey, L. (1999). Marketing, business processes, and shareholder value: An organizationally embedded view of marketing activities and the discipline of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63, 168-179. Recuperado de https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2257&context=lkcsb_research
Stewart, D. W. (2009). Marketing accountability: Linking marketing actions to financial results. Journal of Business Research, 62(6), 636- 643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.02.005
Tam, J. L. M. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: An integrative model. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(7-8), 897-917. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257041838719
Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. The Academy of Management Perspective, 28(4), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0116
Uzma, S. H. (2108). Marketing metrics: a meta-synthesis. In. J. Business Excellence, 18(2), 113-179. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2018.089148
Varadarajan, R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: Domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(2), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-01767
Vargo, S. L. e Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
Vorhies, D. W. e Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.1.80.55505
Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The Resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160303
Wong, K. K.-K. (2016). Technical Note: Mediation analysis, categorical moderation analysis, and higher-order constructs modeling in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (pls-sem): A b2b Example using Smartpls. Marketing Bulletin, 26, 1-22. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib,uid&db=bth&AN=115883538&lang=pt=-pt&site=eds-live&scopesite
Woodburn, D. (2006). Marketing measurement action research model. Measuring Business Excellence, 10(2), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040610668701
Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894350
Yi, Y. e Hoseong, J. (2003). Effects of loyalty programs on value perception, program loyalty and brand loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003002
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Innovar

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:








