Organizational identity: components and construction
Identidad organizacional: componentes y construcción
Identidade organizacional: componentes e construção
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n78.90303Palabras clave:
Organizations, organizational identity, middle managers, recognition, transcendence, security, organization studies (en)estudios organizacionales, identidad organizacional, organizaciones, mandos medios, reconocimiento, trascendencia, seguridad (es)
colaboradores de médio escalão, estudos organizacio¬nais, identidade organizacional, organizações, reconhecimento, transcendência, segurança (pt)
Descargas
The objective of this research was to understand the identity construction process of the middle managers (MMs) of a Colombian multilatina. From the research question, i.e., what are the components involved in the identity construction process of MMs?, it was established that MMs are those individuals whose level in the organization is below top managers and above first-level supervisors. The theoretical framework used was organizational identity (OI). To this end, literature review focused on the discussion of research works whose epistemological basis considered OI as a process, not as an invariant or static element. The case study used a qualitative approach. Identity construction processes are made up of three categories: recognition, transcendence and security. The research was conducted under the case study method and targeted a relatively new organization that is in an unfinished and immature process of adopting a specific OI. The components explain the process and make it possible to elucidate a new way of approaching it at the management level; at the same time, due to their clarity and understandability, they can be used for other studies, as well as for consultancies. Finally, the integration of concepts from the social sciences for conceptualization and analysis nourishes the dialog with the administrative field.
El objetivo de esta investigación fue comprender el proceso de construcción identitario de los mandos medios de una empresa multilatina colombiana a partir de la siguiente pregunta de investigación: ¿cuáles son los componentes que intervienen en el proceso de construcción identitario de los mandos medios? Los mandos medios son aquellos individuos que están localizados debajo de los top managers y por encima de la primera línea de supervisión. El marco teórico que se utilizó fue el la Identidad Organizacional (IO). Para ello, se revisaron los antecedentes orientados a discutir investigaciones cuyo fundamento epistemológico considera la io como un proceso y no como un elemento invariante o estático. El estudio de caso se abordó desde una perspectiva cualitativa. Por su parte, el proceso de construcción identitario se compone de tres categorías: reconocimiento, trascendencia y seguridad. La investigación se realizó bajo la modalidad de estudio de caso y se circunscribe a una organización relativamente nueva que se encuentra en un proceso inconcluso de adoptar una IO específica. Los componentes explican el proceso y permiten dilucidar una nueva manera de abordarlo a nivel de la gestión, a la par que, por su claridad y facilidad comprensiva, pueden ser utilizados para otras investigaciones, así como para consultorías y asesorías. Por último, la integración de conceptos desde las ciencias sociales para la conceptualización y el análisis enriquece el diálogo con el campo administrativo.
O objetivo desta pesquisa foi compreender o processo de construção identitário dos colaboradores de médio escalão de uma empresa multilatina colombiana a partir da pergunta de pesquisa “Quais os componentes que intervêm no processo de construção identitário dos colaboradores de médio escalão?” Esses são os indivíduos que estão abaixo dos top managers e por cima da supervisão de primeiro nível. O referencial teórico utilizado foi a Identidade Organizacional (IO). Para isso, foram revisados os antecedentes dirigidos a discutir pesquisas cujo fundamento epistemológico considera a io como um processo, e não como algo invariante ou estático. O estudo de caso é abordado de uma perspectiva qualitativa. O processo de construção identitário é composto por estas três categorias: reconhecimento, transcendência e segurança. A pesquisa foi realizada sob a modalidade de estudo de caso e está vinculada a uma organização relativamente nova, que se encontra em um processo inacabado e imaturo de adotar uma IO em específico. Os componentes explicam o processo e permitem evidenciar uma nova maneira de abordá-lo no âmbito da gestão, ao mesmo tempo que, por sua clareza e facilidade compreensiva, podem ser utilizados para outras pesquisas, bem como para consultorias e assessorias. Por último, a integração de conceitos a partir das ciências sociais para a conceituação e a análise enriquece o diálogo com o campo administrativo.
Referencias
Ainsworth, S., Grant, D., & Iedema, R. (2009). Keeping things moving: space and the construction of middle management identity in a post-npm organization. Discourse & Communication, 3(1), 5-25.
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulations as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), 619-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00305
Anglin, A. H., Reid, S. W., Short, J. C., Zachary, M. A., & Rutherford, M. W. (2017). An archival approach to measuring family influence: An organizational identity perspective. Family Business Review, 30(1). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516669254
Aracı, Ö. (2019). Using content analysis to reveal organizational identity orientation: Evidence from the newspaper industry. Management Research Review, 42(3), 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-01-2018-0018
Ashforth, B. E., & Schinoff, B. S. (2016). Identity under construction: How individuals come to define themselves in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 111-137. https://doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062322
Baltà, J. (2019). Promoción y emergencia de identidades organizacionales: entre el control y la cocreación. Athenea Digital. Revista De Pensamiento e Investigación Social, 19(2), e-2116. https://doi:https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.2116
Barker, J. (1999). The discipline of teamwork. London: Sage.
Bédard, R. (2004). Los fundamentos del pensamiento y las prácticas administrativas: la trilogía administrativa. Revista Ad Minister, 4, 80-108. http://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/administer/article/view/695
Brown, A. D. (2020). Identities in organizations. In A. D. Brown [ed.], The Oxford Handbook of Identities in Organizations (pp. 1-31). Oxford: Oxford University Press, UK.
Brown, A. D., & Lewis, M. A. (2011). Identities, discipline and routines. Organization Studies, 32(7), 871-895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611407018
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Elements of the sociology of corporate. London: Heinemann.
Chia, R. (1996). Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2007). Desperately seeking legitimacy: Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies, 28(4), 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067995
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173-208. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4131471
Coupland, C., & Brown, A. D. (2004). Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case study of Royal Dutch Shell.
Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1325-1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00477.x
Czarniawska, B., & Wolff, R. (1998). Constructing new identities in established organization fields. International Studies of Management and Organization, 28(3), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1998.11656739
Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Deetz, S. (1994). The micro-politics of identity formation: The case of a knowledge intensive firm. Human Studies, 17, 23-44. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01322765
Denissen, A. M. (2010). The right tools for the job: Constructing gender meanings and identities in the male-dominated building trades. Human Relations, 63(7), 1051-1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349922
Dussel, E. (2000). Europa, modernidad y eurocentrismo. In E. Lander (Comp.), La colonialidad del saber: eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas (pp. 69-81). Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
Echeverri, P. (2017). Co-creating sociality: Organizational identity and marketing in voluntary organizations. The Service Industries Journal, 38(5-6), 282-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1374373
Echeverría, B. (1989). Modernidad y capitalismo (15 Tesis). Cuadernos Políticos, 58, 41-62.
Echeverría, B. (1996). El ethos barroco. Debate Feminista, 13, 67-87.
Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H., & Worthington, F. (2002). Control and resistance in “The Factory that Time Forgot”. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1053-1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00272
Fiol, C. M. (2002). Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organizational Science, 13(6), 653-666. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.653.502
Flick, U. (2008a). Managing quality in qualitative research. London: sage.
Flick, U. (2008b). Designing qualitative research. London: sage.
Foreman, P. O., & Whetten, D. A. (2016). Measuring Organizational Identity. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199689576.013.3
Foreman, P. O., Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2012). An identity-based view of reputation, image, and legitimacy: Clarifications and distinctions among related constructs. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199596706.013.000
Gioia, D. A., Price, K. N., Hamilton, A. L., & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Forging and identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 1-46.
Gandler, S. (2012). Reconocimiento versus ethos. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 43, 47-64.
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. (2000). Organizational identity, image and adaptative instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/259263
Godelier, M. (1996). The Engima of the Gift. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gonzales-Miranda, D. R., & Uribe-Correa, B. A. (2018). Proceso metodológico y construcción de un sistema categorial de una investigación sobre identidad organizacional. Psicoperspectivas, 17(3), 1-15. https://doi:10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol17-issue3-fulltext-1349
Gonzales-Miranda, D. R. (2016). Identidad organizacional de los mandos medios en equilibrio liminal. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 21(75), 509-529. https://www.produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/rvg/article/view/21896
Gonzales-Miranda, D. R., Gentilin, M., & Ocampo-Salazar, C. A. (2014). Organizational identity: What is the conversation currently dealing with? Paradigms, perspectives and discussions. Journal of centrum Cathedra, 7(2), 129-146.
Harquail, C. V., & King, A. W. (2010). Construing Organizational Identity: The role of embodied cognition. Organization Studies, 31(12), 1619-1648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610376143
Harquail, C. V., & King, A. W. (2010). Construing Organizational Identity: The role of embodied cognition. Organization Studies, 31(12), 1619-1648.
Haslam, S. A., Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. (2017). Metatheories and metaphors of organizational identity: Integrating social constructionist, social identity, and social actor perspectives within a social interactionist model. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(3), 318-336. https://doi:10.1111/ijmr.12150
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55(8), 989-1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055008181
Hinsley, A. (2017). Developing new organizational identity: Merger of St. Louis Public Radio and the St. Louis Beacon. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 24(1), 144-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2017.1296445
Honneth, A. (2006). El reconocimineto como ideología. isegoría, 35, 129-150. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2006.i35.33
Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2002a). Narratives of organizational identiy and identification: A case study of hegemony and resistance. Organization Studies, 23(3), 421-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233005
Humphreys, M., & Brown, A. D. (2002b). Dress and identity: A Turkish case study. Journal of Management Studies, 39(7), 927-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00318
Kant, I. (1999): Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, Felix Meiner, Hamburg (trad. cast.: Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Madrid: Espasa.
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1989). Power and subjectivity at work. Sociology, 29, 761-782. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42853833
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Madsen, V. T. (2016). Constructing organizational identity on internal social media: A case study of coworker communication in Jyske Bank. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 200-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415627272
Mantere, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). Becoming a strategist: The roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work. Strategic Organization, 18(1) 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020908781
Mauss, M. (2009). Ensayo sobre el don. Forma y función del intercambio en las sociedades arcaicas. Madrid: Katz.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Miscenko, D., & Day, D. V. (2016). Identity and identification at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(3), 215-247. https://doi:10.1177/2041386615584009
Mujib, H. (2017). Organizational identity: An ambiguous concept in practical terms. Administrative Sciences, 7(3), 28. https://doi:10.3390/admsci7030028
Oliva-Mendoza, C. (2013). Semiótica y capitalismo. Ensayos sobre la obra de Bolívar Echeverría (1.ª ed.). Mexico City: Editorial Itaca.
Oliva-Mendoza, C. (2016). La ley formal del barroco y la teoría crítica. En: S. Ugalde-Quintana & O. Ette (eds.), Políticas y estrategias de la crítica: ideología, historia y actores de los estudios literarios (pp. 85-99). Madrid: Iberoamericana.
Oliver, D., & Vough, H. C. (2019). Practicing identity in emergent firms: How practices shape founders’ organizational identity claims. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019863642
Pendse, M., & Ojha, A. (2017). Towards an understanding of organizational identity and organizational self: Insights from Indian psychology. Journal of Human Values, 23(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685816673488
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture.
Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159775
Resende, R. G., Demo, G., & Nascimento, T. G. (2019). Identidade organizacional. Gestão E Sociedade, 13(36), 3038-3061. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v13i36.2507
Rodrigues, S. B., & Child, J. (2008). The development of corporate identity: A political perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 885-911. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00750.x
Sainsaulieu, R. (1996). Lídentité au travail. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Schreiter, K., & Ravasi, D. (2018). Institutional pressures and organizational identity: The Case of Deutsche Werkstätten Hellerau in the gdr and beyond, 1945-1996. Business History Review, 92(3), 453-481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007680518000776
Simpson, B., & Carroll, B. (2008). Re-viewing “Role” in processes of identity construction. Organization, 15(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407084484
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administartive Science Quarterly, 50(35), 35-67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30037175
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810
Wei, T., & Clegg, J. (2017). Effect of Organizational identity change on integration approaches in acquisitions: Role of organizational dominance. British Journal of Management, 29(2), 337-355. https://doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12226
Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten revisted strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606291200
Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor conception or organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41(4), 393-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302238775
Ybema, S., Keenoy, T., Oswick, C., Beverungen, A., Ellis, N., & Sabelis, I. (2009). Articulating identities. Human Relations, 62(3), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101904
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Julieth Alzate, Diego René Gonzales-Miranda. (2025). Liminal identity in the cooperative organization: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, , p.1. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.103424.
2. Emmanuel Nyameke, Harri Haapasalo. (2022). Identity formation and maintenance in a large hospital construction project. Project Leadership and Society, 3, p.100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100058.
3. Diego René Gonzales-Miranda. (2025). Los Estudios Organizacionales en Latinoamérica. Un análisis del camino transitado y perspectivas de desarrollo. Cuestiones de Sociología, (32), p.e191. https://doi.org/10.24215/23468904e191.
4. Yunpeng Sun, Arslan Ayub, Tehreem Fatima, Hassan Danial Aslam, Salman Bahoo. (2022). The knowledge hiding loop: exploring the boundary conditions. Kybernetes, 51(11), p.3320. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2021-0307.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Innovar

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:








