Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
La separación entre sostenibilidad organizacional y desarrollo sostenible: una reflexión sobre herramientas emergentes para disminuir la brecha
The division between organizational sustainability and sustainable development: a reflection on emerging tools to reduce the gap
A separação entre sustentabilidade organizacional e desenvolvimento sustentável: reflexão sobre ferramentas emergentes para diminuir o gap
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n80.93668Palabras clave:
alianzas intersectoriales, desarrollo sostenible, innovación social, negocios híbridos, sostenibilidad organizacional (es)Intersectoral alliances, sustainable development, social innovation, hybrid businesses, organizational sustainability (en)
desenvolvimento sustentável, inovação social, negócios híbridos, parcerias intersetoriais, sustentabilidade organizacional (pt)
La literatura en management ha revelado que hay una brecha conceptual, que deriva a la práctica empresarial, entre los conceptos de sostenibilidad organizacional (micro-dimensión) y la sostenibilidad ecológica o desarrollo sostenible (macro-dimensión). Este artículo de reflexión llama la atención sobre la brecha identificada, mostrando algunos de los desafíos que esta separación demanda a las organizaciones. Se argumenta que las alianzas intersectoriales, la innovación social, y los negocios híbridos son formas organizacionales emergentes, basadas en la colaboración, que aportan al cierre de la brecha. La discusión sobre la distancia entre los enfoques de la sostenibilidad tipo valor compartido (inside-out) y los enfoques de sostenibilidad con foco en el bien común (outside-in), se ejemplifica con formas organizacionales emergentes en el contexto colombiano, con un énfasis en organizaciones con incidencia en la construcción de paz.
Management literature has revealed the existing gap between the concepts of organizational sustainability (micro-dimension) and ecological sustainability or sustainable development (macro-dimension) in the business world. Hence, this article draws attention to the identified breach, showing some of the challenges that this separation establishes for organizations. It is argued that intersectoral alliances, social innovation, and hybrid businesses are emerging organizational forms based on collaboration that could contribute to bridging the gap. The debate around the distance between shared-value sustainability approaches (inside-out) and sustainability perspectives focused on the common good (outside-in) is represented through emerging organizational forms in the Colombian context, with a particular emphasis on organizations with a direct impact on peacebuilding.
A literatura em management vem revelando que há uma brecha conceitual que deriva da prática empresarial entre os conceitos de sustentabilidade organizacional (microdimensão) e sustentabilidade ecológica ou desenvolvimento sustentável (macrodimensão). Neste artigo de reflexão, é enfatizada a brecha identificada e são apresentados alguns dos desafios que essa separação implica para as organizações. É argumentado que as parcerias intersetoriais, a inovação social e os negócios híbridos são formas organizacionais emergentes, baseadas na colaboração, que contribuem para o fechamento do gaop. A discussão sobre a distância entre as abordagens da sustentabilidade tipo valor compartilhado (inside-out) e as abordagens de sustentabilidade com foco no bem comum (outside-in) é exemplificada com formas organizacionais emergentes no contexto colombiano, com ênfase em organizações com incidência na construção da paz.
Referencias
Alberti, F. G., & Varón-Garrido, M. A. V. (2017). Can profit and sustainability goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2015-0124
Alto Data Analytics (ADA). (2018). Sustainability: Why CEOs need to become activists. Big data public opinion research reveals consumers expect CEOs to lead as activists in sustainability. https://www.alto-analytics.com/en_US/sustainability-article/
Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 12(3), 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030760
Artesanías de Colombia (16 de octubre 2013). Mejoramiento de la competitividad y productividad de la población artesana en la ciudad de Bogotá. http://artesaniasdecolombia.com.co/PortalAC/C_nosotros/mejoramiento-de-la-competitividad-y-productividad-de-la-poblacion-artesana-en-la-ciudad-de-bogota_2802
Austin, J. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(supl.1), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291S004
Austin, J. E. (2005). Alianzas sociales en América Latina: Enseñanzas extraídas de colaboraciones entre el sector privado y organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://publications.iadb.org/es/alianzas-sociales-en-america-latina-ensenanzas-extraidas-de-colaboraciones-entre-el-sector-privado
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Badurina-Đurkin, J., Perić, M., & Šebrek-Kljaić, J. (2018). Hybrids by choice or by chance: Applying hybrid spectrum typology in Croatian tourism. Strategic Management, 23(4), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.5937/straman1804003d
Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001341
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J. and Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3),50-55. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/in_search_of_the_hybrid_ideal
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.893615
Bilodeau, A., Potvin, L., Galarneau, M., & Lefebvre, C. (2016). L’utilisation de la théorie de l’acteur-réseau dans la recherche interventionnelle en santé publique. Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, 64(supl. 2), S101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respe.2015.07.014
B Lab (Sistemas B) (2020). Best for the world 2019. https://bthechange.com/bestfortheworld/home
Blasco, J., King, A., & Jayaram, S. (2018). How to Report on the SDGs: What Good Looks Like and Why It Matters. Madrid, Spain: KPMG. https://home.kpmg.com
Borland, H., Ambrosini, V., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2016). Building theory at the intersection of ecological sustainability and strategic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2471-6
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5), e1400253. http://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
Consejo Empresarial Colombiano para el Desarrollo Sostenible (Cecodes). (2017). Desarrollo de negocios inclusivos con impacto social. Una herramienta para la toma de decisiones. http://cecodes.org.co/site/wp-content/uploads/Un-Territorio-No-Cambia-Solo/assets/desarrollo-de-negocios-inclusivos-con-impacto-social.pdf
Cielemęcka, O., & Daigle, C. (2019). Posthuman sustainability: An ethos for our anthropocenic future. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(7-8), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419873710
Corporation 20/20 (2008) Corporation 20/20 Designing for social purpose. https://www.corporation2020.org/overview_goals.htm
Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2009.39985540
Dahlmann, F., Stubbs, W., Griggs, D., & Morrell, K. (2019). Corporate actors, the UN Sustainable Development Goals and Earth System Governance: A research agenda. The Anthropocene Review, 6(1-2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619848217
Díaz-Correa, J. E., & López-Navarro, M. A. (2018). Managing sustainable hybrid organisations: A case study in the agricultural sector. Sustainability, 10(9), 3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093010
Dionisio, M., & de Vargas, E. R. (2020). Corporate social innovation: A systematic literature review. International Business Review, 29(2), 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101641
Dueñas-Ocampo, S., Perdomo-Ortiz, J., & Villa Castaño, L.E. (2014). El concepto de consumo socialmente responsable y su medición. Una revisión de la literatura. Estudios Gerenciales, 30(132), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2014.01.022
Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176
El Tiempo, (31 de octubre del 2019). https://www.eltiempo.com/mas-contenido/manos-amigas-buscan-el-progreso-del-campo-428820.
European Commission (ec). (2013). Guide to social innovation. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/84453/Guide_to_Social_Innovation.pdf
Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12115
Felber, C. (2015). Change Everything. Zed Books.
Folke, C., Österblom, H., Jouffray, J. B., Lambin, E. F., Adger, W. N., Scheffer, M., ... & de Zeeuw, A. (2019). Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3(10), 1396-1403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0978-z
Franco, N., Dueñas-Ocampo, S., & Castillo, M. (2016). Alqueria: more than just a glass of milk. Havard Business Publishing.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
Goyal, S., Sergi, B.S. & Jaiswal, M. (2015). How to design and implement social business models for base-of-the-pyramid (BoP) markets? The European Journal of Development Research, 27(5), 850-867. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.71
Gray, B., & Stites, J. P. (2013). “Sustainability through partnerships. Capitalizing on collaboration”. Network for business sustainability, case study, 24, 1-110. http://www.wageningenportals.nl/sites/default/files/resource/nbs-systematic-review-partnerships.pdf
Grupo Nutresa (2019) Cacaoteros por la paz. https://gruponutresa.com/noticias/grupo-nutresa-fortalece-compromiso-con-cacaoteros-colombianos/
Gutiérrez, R., & Lobo, I. D. (2006). Caminos que la filantropía puede abrir. Sociedad y Economía, 10, 47-67. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=99616145002
Hammond, A. L., Kramer, Tran, J. T., W. J., Katz, R. S., & Walker, C. (2007). The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. Washington: World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/research/next-4-billion
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. Earthscan.
Jiang, L., & O’Neill, B. C. (2017). Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008
Kagan, C., & Burton, M. H. (2018). Putting the ‘social’ into sustainability science. En W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research (pp. 285-298). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_17
Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015a). Cross-sector collaboration, institutional gaps, and fragility: The role of social innovation partnerships in a conflict-affected region. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(2), 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.14.157
Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2015b). Partnerships for peace and development in fragile states: Identifying missing links. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(4), 422-437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0122
Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2016). Hybrid business models for peace and reconciliation. Business Horizons, 59(5), 503-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.014
Kourula, A., Pisani, N., & Kolk, A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and inclusive development: Highlights from international business and management research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.003
Lohas Beans (2020) Lohas Beans. Recuperado de: https://lohasbeans.com/
Latapí-Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
Mancini, M. S., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., Lin, D., Bastianoni, S., Wackernagel, M., & Marchettini, N. (2016). Ecological footprint: Refining the carbon footprint calculation. Ecological Indicators, 61(2), 390-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.040
“Manos amigas buscan el progreso del campo”. (31 de octubre de 2019). El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/mas-contenido/manos-amigas-buscan-el-progreso-del-campo-428820
Miklian, J., & Schouten, P. (2019). Broadening ‘business’, widening ‘peace’: A new research agenda on business and peace-building. Conflict, Security and Development, 19(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1561612
Mishra, S. (2019). Evolution of corporate social responsibility: two sets of explanation. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(8), 1341-1356. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2019-0135
Mirvis, P., Baltazar, M. E., Googins, B., & Albareda, L. (2016). Corporate social innovation: How firms learn to innovate for the greater good. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5014-5021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.073
Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford Said Business School. https://www.youngfoundation.org/publications/social-innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated/
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., ... & Solecki, W. (2017). The roads ahead: narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change, 42, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
O'Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015). Transforming consumption: From decoupling, to behavior change, to system changes for sustainable consumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40, 233-259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224
Parra, C. (2013). Social sustainability: A competing concept to social innovation? En F. Moulaert, D. McCallum, A. Mehmood & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 142.154). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Patagonia (2020) How we work with factories, farms and mills: Promoting fair labor practices and safe working conditions throughout Patagonia’s supply chain. http://www.patagonia.com/corporate-responsibility.html
Parra, C. (2013). Social sustainability: a competing concept to social innovation? En: Moulaert, F. (Ed.), The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. (pp.142-152) Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48-57. https://hbr.org/2002/09/serving-the-worlds-poor-profitably
Roome, N. J. (2013). Sustainable development: Social innovation at the interface of business, society, and ecology. En T. Osburg & R. Schmidpeter (Ed.), Social Innovation. Solutions for a sustainable future (pp. 299-308). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36540-9_27
Rodrigo, P., & Arenas, D. (2014). La nueva gobernanza política y las colaboraciones intersectoriales para el desarrollo sostenible. Innovar, 24(53), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n53.43945
Scott, L., & McGill, A. (2018). From promise to reality: Does business really care about the sdgs? Price Waterhouse Coopers. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/SDG/sdg-reporting-2018.pdf
Prahalad, C.K. and Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48-57. https://hbr.org/2002/09/serving-the-worlds-poor-profitably
Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the sdgs: The need to move beyond ‘business as usual’. Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1623
Semana (25 de octubre de 2018) El café de la empresa nacional Lohas Beans conquista Tokio. https://www.semana.com/contenidos-editoriales/japon-el-mundo-al-derecho/articulo/el-cafe-de-la-empresa-nacional-lohas-beans-conquista-tokio/588274
Semana (6 de noviembre de 2019) El café de la paz: la experiencia de desmovilizados sembrando café. https://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/el-cafe-de-la-paz-la-experiencia-de-desmovilizados-sembrando-cafe/619264
Sun, J., Wu, S., & Yang, K. (2018). An ecosystemic framework for business sustainability. Business Horizons, 61(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.006
The Body Shop (2020) Enrich not exploit™ targets. https://www.thebodyshop.com/en-us/about-us/our-commitment/corporate-social-responsibility
Triana-Ángel, N., & Ariza-Aya, M. (2019). Juventud ganadera, motor para el cambio: alianzas estratégicas con la empresa privada (ciat/ccafs-Alquería): Nacimiento, motivaciones y objetivos de la iniciativa Herederos de Tradición llevada a cabo por Alquería dentro de sus programas de Formación Campesina. ccafs Info Note. cgiar Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (ccafs) https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/107074
Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4
Unilever (2020) Making sustainable living commonplace for 8 billion people. Recuperado de: https://www.unilever.com/sustainable-living/our-approach-to-a-brighter-future/
United Nations (un). (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. un. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Van der Waal, J. W., & Thijssens, T. (2020). Corporate involvement in Sustainable Development Goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119625
Van Tulder, R., Seitanidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4
Waddock, S. (1991), A typology of social partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 22(4), 480-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979102200405
Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, (50)2, 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01073.x
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Luis Guananga, Rocío Poveda-Bautista, Mónica García-Melón. (2023). Management Indicators for the Organisational Sustainability of Associative Productive Ventures. Sustainability, 15(23), p.16166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316166.
2. Vanessa Cano Mejía, Juan David Arias Suárez. (2023). La sostenibilidad y la sustentabilidad en la Administración y las Organizaciones: una revisión de literatura.. Teuken Bidikay - Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Organizaciones, Ambiente y Sociedad, 13(20) https://doi.org/10.33571/teuken.v13n20a2.
3. Lida Esperanza Villa‐Castaño, Jesús Perdomo‐Ortiz, Sebastian Dueñas‐Ocampo. (2023). Business–society interface: An exploration of a paradigmatic heuristic model of corporate social responsibility in Colombia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(6), p.3203. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2547.
4. María Cristina Torres Guerrón, Klever Efraín Naranjo Borja. (2022). Tecnología Social en el Ecuador. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(99), p.1215. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.99.23.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
