Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Amazônia indomável: relações fora do alcance da domesticação
Unruly Amazon: relations out of range to the ideia of domestication
Amazonia indomable: relaciones fuera del alcance de la domesticación
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ma.v12n1.89601Palabras clave:
Domesticação, plantas silvestres, Amazônia, povos indígenas (pt)Domestication, wild plants, Amazonia, indigenous people (en)
Domesticación, plantas salvajes, Amazonia, pueblos indígenas (es)
Descargas
Ultimamente tem sido contundente a crítica sobre o conceito de domesticação tal qual forjado pela Grande Narrativa com base na história do Oriente Próximo, que o associa ao domínio da Natureza pelo homem, ao sedentarismo, à criação de excedente, ao progresso e à origem do Estado. Por sua vez, no contexto da Amazônia antrópica, o conceito ganhou matizes particulares, tendo sido ampliado e dissociado da noção de agricultura e sedentarismo. Este trabalho tem um duplo objetivo: aproximar ou fazer cruzar as linhas narrativas destes dois fluxos do debate e tentar mostrar outras práticas ou tipos da relação entre humanos e plantas que estão fora do alcance da domesticação.
Abstract
Lately, the concept of domestication, like depicted in the Great Narrative with its basis in the history of Near East, is passing through strong criticism. In the context of the discussion about Anthropic Amazon, the concept has gained different shades and has been amplified and dissociated from the notion of agriculture and sedentarism. This work has a double objective: near or intertwine the narrative lines between the bias of the debate about the domestication of Amazonian forests; and show there are other practices or kinds of relations between humans and plants that are out of range to the idea of domestication.
Últimamente ha habido una fuerte crítica sobre el concepto de domesticación forjado por la Gran Narrativa basada en la historia del Cercano Oriente, que lo asocia con la dominación de la naturaleza por el hombre, el sedentarismo, la creación de excedentes, el progreso y el origen del Estado. A su vez, en el contexto de la Amazonía antrópica, el concepto adquirió matices particulares, habiéndose expandido y disociado de la noción de agricultura y estilo de vida sedentario. Este trabajo tiene un doble objetivo: traer o entrelazar las líneas narrativas de estas dos corrientes de debate y tratar de mostrar otras prácticas o tipos de relación entre humanos y plantas que están fuera del alcance de la domesticación.
Referencias
ALBERT, Bruce. (1985). Temps dus sangs, temps des cendres. Représentation de la meladie, systèmerituel et espace politique chez les Yanomami du sud-est (Amazonie brésilienne) (These présentée em vue du grade de docteur). Université de Paris X, laboratoire d’ethnologie et de sociologie comparative, Paris.
AZEVEDO, Dagoberto Lima. (2018). Agenciamento do mundo pelos Kumuã Ye’pamahsã. O conjunto dos bahsese na organização do espaço Di’ta Nʉhkʉ. Coleção Reflexividades Indígenas. Núcleo de Estudos da Amazônia Indígena - NEAI. Manaus: Edua.
BALÉE, W. (1989). The Culture of Amazonian Forests. In Darrell. A. Posey and William Balée (Eds.), Resource Management in Amazonia: Indigenous and Folk Strategies (pp.1–21). New York: NYGB Press.
BALÉE, W. (1994). Footprints of the forest: Ka’apor ethnobotany – a historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. New York: Columbia University Press.
BALÉE, W. (1998). Historical ecology: premises and postulates. In William Balée (Ed.), Advances in Historical Ecology (pp.13-29). New York: Columbia University Press.
BALÉE, W. and Erickson, C. L. (2006). Time, Complexity and Historical Ecology. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/bale13562
BRUZZI, A. (1962). A civilização do Uaupés. Missão Salesiana do Rio Negro – Amazonas – Brasil, São Paulo.
BUSH, M. B. and Silman, M. R. (2007). Amazonian exploitation revisited: ecological asymmetry and the policy pendulum. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1890/070018
CARNEIRO DA CUNHA, M. (2019). Antidomestication in the Amazon. Swidden and its foes. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 9(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/703870
CASSIDY, R. and Mullin, M. (2007). Where the Wild Things are Now. Domestication reconsidered. New York: Berg, Oxford.
CHERNELA, J. M. (1987). Pesca e hierarquização tribal no alto Uaupés. Suma etnológica brasileira, 1, 235-249.
CLEMENT, C. R. (1999a). 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Economic Botany 53, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866498
CLEMENT, C. R. (1999b). 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. II. Crop biogeography at contact. Economic Botany 53, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866499
CLEMENT, C. R. (2014). “Landscape domestication and archaeology,” in Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology, edited by Claire Smith, 4388-4394. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_817
CLEMENT, C. R., de Cristo-araújo, M., D’eeckenbrugge, G. C., Pereira, A. A. and Rodrigues, D. P. (2010). Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity 2, 72-106. https://doi.org/10.3390/d2010072
CLEMENT, C. R., Denevan, W. M., Heckenberger, M. J., Junqueira, A. B., Neves, E. G., Teixeira, W. G. and Woods, W. I. (2015). The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1812), 20150813.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0813
DESCOLA, P. (2016). Landscape as transfiguration. Edward Westermarck memorial Lecture, October. Suomen Antropologi, 41(1), 3-13.
EMPERAIRE, L., Eloy, L. (2008). A cidade, um foco de diversidade agrícola no Rio Negro (Amazonas, Brasil)?. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 3(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-81222008000200005
FAUSTO, C. (2012). Too many owners: ownership and mastery in Amazonia. In Marc Brightman, Vanessa Grotti and Olga Ulturgasheva (Eds), Shamanism in rainforest and tundra (pp.85–105). Oxford: Berghahn.
FAUSTO, C. and Neves, E. G. (2018). Was there ever a Neolithic in the Neotropics? Plant familiarization and biodiversity in the Amazon. Antiquity, 92(366), 1604-1618. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.157
FIJN, N. (2018). Dog ears and tails. Different Relational Ways of Being with Canines in Aboriginal Australia and Mongolia. In Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (Eds), Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (pp.72-93). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
HARAWAY, D. (2003). The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press: Chicago.
HECKEBERGER, M. J. and Neves, E. G. (2009). Amazonian Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164310
HECKENBERGER, M. J., Kuikuro, A., Kuikuro, U. T., Russell, J. C., Schmidt, M., Fausto, C. and Franchetto, B. (2003). Amazonia 1492: pristine forest or cultural parkland? Science, 301, 1710-1714. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086112
HECKENBERGER, M. J., Russell, J. C., Toney, J. R. and Schmidt, M. J. (2007). The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: Implications for biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1979
KIRKSEY, E. and Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
KROEMER, G. (1994). Kunahã Made, o povo do veneno, sociedade e cultura do povo Zuruahá. Edições Mensageiro: Belém.
LEVIS, C., Costa, F. R. C., Bongers, F., Peña-Claros, M., Clement, C. R.,. Junqueira, A. B., Neves, E. G., … ter Steege, H. (2017). Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition. Science 355 (6328), 925-931. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal0157
LEVIS, C., Flores, B. M., Moreira, P. A., Luize, B. G., Alves, R. P., Franco-Moraes, J., Lins, J., ..., Clement, C. R. (2018). How people domesticated Amazonian forests. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00171
LEVIS, Carolina. (2018). Domestication of Amazonian Forests (Tese de doutorado). Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Brazil e Wageningen University, Netherlands.
LIEN, M. E. (2018). Ducks into houses. Domestication and its margins. In Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (Eds), Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (pp.117-137). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
MCMICHAEL, C. H., Bush, M. B., Piperno, D. R., Silman, M. R., Zimmerman, A. R. and Anderson, C. (2012). Spatial and temporal scales of pre-Columbian disturbance associated with western Amazonian lakes. The Holocene, 22, 131-141.
MEGGERS, B. J. (Ed.). (1971). Evolution and anthropology: A centennial appraisal. anthropological society of Washington.
MENDES DOS SANTOS, G. (2016). Plantas e parentelas. Notas sobre a história da agricultura no Médio Purus. In Gilton Mendes dos Santos and Miguel Aparicio (Eds), Redes Arawa. Ensaios de etnologia do Médio Purus (pp.19-39). Manaus: EDUA.
MURPHY, R. F. (1960). Headhunter's Heritage. Social and economic change among the munduruku indians. California: Berkeley and Los Angeles.
NEVES, E. G. (2007). El Formativo que Nunca Terminó: la larga historia de estabilidad em lãs ocupaciones humanas de La Amazonía Central. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 11, 117-142.
NEVES, E. G., Petersen, J. B., Bartone, R. N. and Silva, C. A. (2003). Historical and socio-cultural origins of Amazonian Dark Earths. In Johannes Lehmann, Dirse C. Kern, Brundi Glaser and William I. Woods (Eds), Amazonian Dark Earths: origin, properties, management (pp.29–50). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2597-1_3
OLIVEIRA, J. C. (2016). Mundos de roças e florestas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciencias Humanas. Belém, 11(1), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222016000100007
PERES, C. A., and Baider, C. (1997). Seed dispersal, spatial distribution and population structure of Brazilnut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) in southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400010749
PIPERNO, D. R. (2011). The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World tropics: patterns, process, and new developments. Current. Anthropology, 52, 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1086/659998
PIPERNO, D. R., McMichael, C., and Bush, M. B. (2015). Amazonia and the Anthropocene: What was the spatial extent and intensity of human landscape modifcation in the Amazon Basin at the end of prehistory? The Holocene, 25, 1588–1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615588374
POSEY, D. A. (1997). Manejo da floresta secundária, capoeiras, campos e cerrados. In: Berta G. Ribeiro (Ed.), Suma etnológica brasileira. Vol. 1. Etnobiologia (pp. 199-215). Belém: Ed. Universidade Federal do Pará.
ROOSEVELT, A. (1989). Resource management in Amazonia before the conquest: beyond ethnographic projection. Advances in Economic Botany, 7, 30-62.
SCOTT, J. C. (2017). Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bvnfk9
SHEPARD Jr., G. and Ramirez, H. (2011). Made in Brazil: Human dispersal of the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) in ancient Amazonia. Economic Botany 1235, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-011-9151-6
SHEPARD, G., Clement, C. R., Mendes dos Santos, G., Pinto, H., Moraes, C. ans Neves, E G. (2019). Ancient and Traditional Agriculture In South America:Tropical Lowlands. Oxford Encyclopedia of Agriculture and the Environment, edited by Richard Hazlitt. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Manuscript in press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.597
SHEPARD, G., Neves, E. G., Clement, C. R., Pinto, H., Moraes, C. and Mendes dos Santos, G. (2020). Ancient and Traditional Agriculture In South America: Tropical Lowlands. Oxford Encyclopedia of Agriculture and the Environment, edited by Richard Hazlitt. Oxford University Press: Subject: Agriculture and the Environment On line Publication Date: Feb 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.597
SHOCK, M. and Moraes, C. (2019). A floresta é o domus: a importância das evidências arqueobotânicas e arqueológicas das ocupações humanas amazônicas na transição Pleistoceno/Holoceno. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, 14(2), 263-289. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981.81222019000200003
SPRUCE, R. (1853). Journal of a Voyage up the Amazon and Rio Negro. HOOKER, WJ, 210-212.
STEWARD, F. C. (1963). Plant physiology. Vol. 3. Inorganic nutrition of plants. Plant physiology. Vol. 3. Inorganic nutrition of plants.
STEWARD, Julian (ed.). (1946-1950). Handbook of South American Indians. V. 1-6. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.
SWANSON, H. A., Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (orgs.). (2018). Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822371649
TSING, A. (2012). Unruly Edges: Mushrooms as Companion Species. Environmental Humanities, 1, 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610012
TSING, A. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bcc
TSING, A. L. (2018). Nine provocations for the study of domestication. In Heather Anne Swanson, Marianne Elisabeth Lien and Gro B. Ween (Eds), Domestication Gone Wild. Politics and Practices of Multispecies Relations (pp.231-251). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
VAN DOOREN, T. (2012). Wild Seed, Domesticated Seed: Companion species and the emergence of agriculture. PAN: Philosophy, Activism, Nature, 9(9), 22-28. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=533917400637473;res=IELHSS
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Santiago Mora. (2021). Serpentear: énfasis y preguntas en el pasado amazónico. Mundo Amazónico, 12(2), p.171. https://doi.org/10.15446/ma.v12n2.93333.
2. Laure Emperaire. (2024). Nature(s) in Construction. The Latin American Studies Book Series. , p.55. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60552-9_4.
3. Gilton Mendes dos Santos, Lorena França. (2024). Culinária da floresta - técnicas indígenas na produção alimentar amazônica. Estudos Avançados, 38(112), p.73. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.202438112.005.
4. Thiago Mota Cardoso, Marilena Altenfelder de Arruda Campos. (2023). Intimate Relations: multispecie stories of manioc social life. Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 20 https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4341.2023v20a20602.
5. Gilton Mendes dos Santos, Lorena França. (2024). Forest cuisine - indigenous techniques in Amazonian food production. Estudos Avançados, 38(112), p.73. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.202438112.005-en.
6. Charles R. Clement, Carolina Levis, Joana Cabral de Oliveira, Carlos Fausto, Gilton Mendes dos Santos, Francineia Fontes Baniwa, Mutuá Mehinaku, Aikyry Wajãpi, Rosenã Wajãpi, Gabriel Sodré Maia. (2021). Naturalness Is in the Eye of the Beholder. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.800294.
7. Laure Emperaire. (2023). Les maniocs et les autres. Revue d’ethnoécologie, (23) https://doi.org/10.4000/ethnoecologie.10153.
8. Luiz Jorge Bezerra da Silva Dias, Anderson Nunes Silva, Allana Pereira Costa, Erick Cristofore Guimarães, Jadson Pinheiro Santos, Tadeu Gomes de Oliveira. (2024). Contribuições à História Geoecológica e Biogeográfica da Amazônia Brasileira durante o Antropoceno. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física, 17(3), p.1875. https://doi.org/10.26848/rbgf.v17.3.p1875-1893.
9. Charles R. Clement, Maria Julia Ferreira, Mariana Franco Cassino, Juliano Franco de Moraes. (2024). Domesticação das paisagens amazônicas. Estudos Avançados, 38(112), p.55. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.202438112.004.
10. Charles R. Clement, Maria Julia Ferreira, Mariana Franco Cassino, Juliano Franco de Moraes. (2024). Domestication of Amazonian landscapes. Estudos Avançados, 38(112), p.55. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.202438112.004-en.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Gilton Mendes dos Santos, Guilherme Henriques Soares
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores son responsables de todas las autorizaciones que la publicación de sus contribuciones pueda requerir. Cuando el manuscrito sea aceptado para publicación, los autores deberán enviar una declaración formal sobre la autenticidad del trabajo, asumiendo personalmente la responsabilidad por todo lo que el artículo contenga e indicando expresamente su derecho a editarlo. La publicación de un artículo en Mundo Amazónico no implica la cesión de derechos por parte de sus autores; sin embargo, el envío de la contribución representa autorización de los autores a Mundo Amazónico para su publicación. En caso de realizarse una reimpresión total o parcial de un artículo publicado en Mundo Amazónico, ya sea en su idioma original o en una versión traducida, se debe citar la fuente original. Los artículos publicados en la revista están amparados por una licencia Creative Commons 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan el copyright y otorgan a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con el reconocimiento de la autoría y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Los autores pueden hacer arreglos contractuales adicionales para la distribución no-exclusiva de la versión publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, colocar en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con el reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
