Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
El trabajo en tiempos de Lean Management: Una revisión crítica de sus efectos adversos sobre las experiencias de los trabajadores
Work in times of lean management: a critical review of its adverse effects based on workers’ experiences
O trabalho em tempos de lean management: uma revisão crítica de seus efeitos adversos sobre as experiências dos(as) trabalhadores(as)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n79.91889Palabras clave:
experiencia de trabajo, lean management, modelos productivos (es)experiência de trabalho, lean management, modelos produtivos (pt)
Experience at work, lean management, productive models (en)
Este artículo presenta los resultados de un estudio de alcance (scoping), cuyo objetivo fue describir y analizar la evidencia empírica internacional encontrada en artículos científicos sobre los efectos adversos de lean management a nivel de las experiencias y condiciones de trabajo. El proceso de revisión y búsqueda de la literatura se centró en recuperar artículos publicados en los últimos diez años, disponibles en tres bases de datos: Scopus, WoS y Psycinfo. De un total de 466 artículos recuperados, se seleccionaron 58 para el proceso de revisión final que consideró la lectura y revisión del texto completo. Los resultados dan cuenta de efectos adversos de lean management en cinco dimensiones de la experiencia de trabajo: la salud y el bienestar, las relaciones entre trabajadores/as y colectivos de trabajo, la organización del proceso de trabajo, las vivencias subjetivas y las relaciones laborales. Se destaca la importancia de promover espacios de discusión pública y debate académico sobre los nuevos modelos de gestión flexible, incorporando distintos actores del mundo sindical, empresarial y del gobierno; asimismo, se consideran criterios tanto económicos y de productividad como aquellos referidos al bienestar, la autonomía y los derechos de los/as trabajadores/as y sus organizaciones.
This paper presents the results of a scoping study aimed at describing and examining international empirical evidence, found in scientific articles, on the adverse effects of lean management in regard to the experiences and conditions of individuals at work. The literature search and review process focused on retrieving articles published during the last ten years and available in three databases: Scopus, WoS, and Psycinfo. From 466 articles retrieved, 58 were selected for the final review process, which consisted of the reading and reviewing of the full texts. The results reveal adverse effects of lean management in five dimensions of workers’ experiences: health and well-being, relationships between workers and working groups, organization of the work process, subjective experiences, and labor relationships. From this, it becomes important to promote spaces for public discussion and academic debate on the deployment of new flexible management models, incorporating different actors from unions, firms, and the government. Besides, economic and productivity criteria are identified as elements referring to the well-being, autonomy and rights of workers and their organizations.
Este artigo apresenta os resultados de um estudo de alcance (scoping), cujo objetivo foi descrever e analisar a evidência empírica internacional encontrada em artigos científicos sobre os efeitos adversos do lean management com respeito às experiências e condições de trabalho. O pro-cesso de revisão e busca da literatura se concentrou em recuperar artigos publicados nos últimos dez anos, disponíveis em três bases de dados: Scopus, WoS e Psycinfo. De um total de 466 artigos recuperados, 58 foram selecio-nados para o processo de revisão final que considerou a leitura e a revisão do texto completo. Os resultados dão conta de efeitos adversos do lean mana-gement em cinco dimensões da experiência dos trabalhadores(as): a saúde e o bem-estar, as relações entre trabalhadores e coletivos de trabalho, a organização do processo de trabalho, as vivências subjetivas e as relações de trabalho. Destaca-se a importância de promover espaços de discussão pública e debate acadêmico sobre os novos modelos de gestão flexível, in-corporando diferentes atores do mundo sindical, empresarial e do governo; igualmente, são considerados critérios tanto econômicos e de produtividade quanto aqueles que se referem ao bem-estar, à autonomia e aos direitos dos trabalhadores(as) e suas organizações.
Referencias
Adarga, M. S., Becerril, L. C., & Champion, C. D. (2011). Gender, aging, and work: Aging workers’ strategies to confront the demands of production in maquiladora plants in Nogales, Mexico. New Solutions : A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 20(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.2190/NS.20.4.f
Alcadipani, R., Hassard, J., & Islam, G. (2018). “I shot the Sheriff”: Irony, sarcasm and the changing nature of workplace resistance. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1452–1487. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12356
Agulló, I. (2012). Producir y consumir: la logística, clave del éxito de una cadena de moda. Política y Sociedad, 49(1), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_POSO.2012.v49.n1.36438
Álvarez, D. (2018). La hegemonía del capital. Estudio sobre el dispositivo de implicación en el trabajo. UBA Sociales. https://www.teseo-press.com/hegemonia
Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (Eds). (1992). Critical management studies. Londres: Sage Publications.
Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (Eds). (2003). Studying manage- ment critically. Londres: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446220030
Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (2011) Introduction. En M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman, & H. Willmott (Eds.), The Ox- ford Handbook of Critical Management Studies (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199595686.013.0001
Apaydin, F. (2017). Uneasy discipline: Training workers after Fordism in Turkey and Argentina. Studies in Political Economy, 98(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2017.1342994
Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace: Trans- forming work systems in the United States. New York: ILR Press.
Araujo, K. (2016). El miedo a los subordinados. Una teoría de la autoridad. Santiago de Chile: LOM ediciones.
Ballé. M., Chartier, N., Coignet, P., Olivencia, S., Powell, D., & Reke, E. (2019) El sensei lean: Vaya, vea, cuestione. Madrid: Lean Enterprise Institute.
Ballé, M., Jones, D., Chaize, J., & Fiume, O. (2018). Estrategia lean. Utilizar lean para crear ventaja competitiva, generar innovación y facilitar el crecimiento sostenible. Madrid: Profit editorial.
Bernardo, M. H., & Sato, L. (2010). Toyotism in Brazil: The contrast be- tween discourse and practice and the consequences for workers’ health. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 20(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.2190/NS.20.3.h
Bhasin, S. (2015). Lean management beyond manufacturing: A holistic approach. Nueva York: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17410-5
Bocquet, R., Dubouloz, S., & Chakor, T., (2019). Lean manufacturing, human resource management and worker health: are there smart boundles of practices along the adoption process? Journal of In- novation Economics & Management, 3(30), 113-144. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.pr1.0050
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2002). El nuevo espíritu del capitalismo. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
Boyer, R., & Freissenet, M. (2003). Los modelos productivos. Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos.
Brown, W. (2017) El pueblo sin atributos. La secreta revolucion del neoliberalismo. Barcelona: Malpaso Ediciones.
Buer, S. -V., Strandhagen, J. O., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). The link between industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2924-2940. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1442945
Cadden, T., Millar, K., Treacy, R., & Humphreys, P. (2020). The mediating influence of organisational cultural practices in successful lean management implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107744
Caputo, P., Campenni, A., & Della Corte, E. (2012). Fiat auto: Industrial relations lost in globalisation. TripleC, 10(2), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i2.413
Cardoso, A. (2019). Logística lean en centros de distribución. Sao Paulo: Lean Institute Brasil.
Carter, B., Danford, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H., Smith, A., & Taylor, P. (2014). “They can’t be the buffer any longer”: Front- line managers and class relations under white-collar lean production. Capital and Class, 38(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816814532409
Carter, B., Danford, A., Howcroft, D., Richardson, H., Smith, A., & Taylor, P. (2017). Uncomfortable truths–teamworking under lean in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(3), 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1111251
Castells, M. (2001). La era de la información : economía, sociedad y cultura. Volumen i. Madrid: Alianza.
Chiarini, A., Found, P., & Rich, N. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding the lean enterprise: Strategies, methodologies, and principles for a more responsive organization. New York: Springer International Publishing. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19995-5
Conti, R., Angelis, J., Cooper, C., Faragher, B., & Gill, C. (2006). The ef- fects of lean production on worker job stress. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(9), 1013-1038. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610682616
Coriat, B. (1992). Pensar al revés. Trabajo y organización en la empresa japonesa. México: Siglo XXI editores.
Danese, P., Manfè, V., & Romano, P. (2018). A systematic literature review on recent lean research: State-of-the-art and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 579-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12156
Danese, P., Romano, P., & Boscari, S. (2017) The transfer process of lean practices in multi-plant companies. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37(4), 468-488. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-12-2014-0571
De la Garza, E. (2017). Del toyotismo al lean production, trabajo clásico y no clásico en multinacionales. En E. de la Garza Toledo & M. Hernandez Romo (Coord.), Configuraciones productivas y relaciones laborales en empresas multinacionales en America Latina (pp. 467-508). Ciudad de México: Gedisa Editorial. http://sgpwe.izt.uam.mx/pages/egt/publicaciones/capituloslibros/ConfMult_CapIX.pdf
Dejours, C., Deranty, J.-P., Renault, E., & Smith, N. (2018). The return of work in critical theory: Self, society, politics. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Durand, J.-P. (2019). Creating the new worker:work, consumption and subordination. Cham: Pallgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93260-6
Giraud, B., Pélisse, J., & Pénissat, E. (2018). Adapting while resisting: The ambivalence of union action in the Face of lean production. Sociologia Del Lavoro, (151), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.3280/sl2018-151011
Grey, C., Huault, I., Perret, V., & Taskin, L. (Eds). (2018). Critical management studies global voices, local accents. New York: Routledge.
Godard, J (2004). A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(2), 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200036
Goger, A. (2013). From disposable to empowered: Rearticulating labor in Sri Lankan apparel factories. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(11), 2628–2645. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45694
Gupta, S., Sharma, M., & Sunder M. V. (2016). Lean services: a systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(8), 1025-1056. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2015-0032
Howison, J. D. (2009). A tough “Cell”: Implementing lean production at Toledo Jeep. Critical Sociology, 35(5), 689–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920509337614
Hultin, L., & Mähring, M. (2017). How practice makes sense in healthcare operations: Studying sensemaking as performative, material-discursive practice. Human Relations, 70(5), 566–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661618
Huo, M.-L., & Boxall, P. (2018). Are all aspects of lean production bad for workers? An analysis of how problem-solving demands affect employee well-being. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(4), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12204
Huxley, C. (2015). Three decades of lean production: Practice, ideology, and resistance. International Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2015.1061859
Hyman, R. (1987). Strategy or structure? Capital, labour and control. Work, Employment and Society, 1(1), 25-55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23745143
Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Benders, J. (2016). Lost in translation? The role of supervisors in lean production. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002215625893
Johansson, J., Abrahamsson, L., & Johansson, S. (2013). If you can’t beat them, join them? The Swedish trade union movement and lean pro- duction. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(3), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185613483999
Kämpf, T. (2018). Lean and white-collar work: Towards new forms of industrialisation of knowledge work and office jobs? Triple C, 16(2), 901-918. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1048
Kalleberg, A. L. (2001). Organizing flexibility: The flexible firm in a new century. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(4), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00211
Karlsson, A.-M., & Nikolaidou, Z. (2016). The textualization of problem handling: Lean discourses meet professional competence in eldercare and the manufacturing industry. Written Communication, 33(3), 275–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316653391
Kilskar, S. S., Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Valle, N. (2018). CoPs facing rationalization: The politics of community reproduction. Learning Organization, 25(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2016-0020
Krause-Jensen, J. (2017). Trimming the social body: An analysis of lean management among family counsellors in a Danish municipality. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 6(2), 68–86. https://doi.org/doi:10.1108/JOE-01-2017-0005
Lancaster, J. (2018) El trabajo de gerenciar. Un camino diario a mejoras sustentables. Madrid: Lean Enterprise Institute.
Las Heras, J. (2018). Unions as “managers of precariousness”: The en- trenchment of micro-corporatism in the Spanish automotive industry and its drawbacks. Employee Relations, 40(6), 1054–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-12-2017-0293
Laval, C., & Dardot, P. (2013). La fábrica del sujeto neoliberal. En La nueva razón del mundo. Ensayo sobre la sociedad neoliberal (pp. 323-381). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Maravelias, C., Thanem, T., & Holmqvist, M. (2013). March meets Marx: The politics of exploitation and exploration in the management of life and labour. En M. Holmqvist & A. Spicer (Eds.), Managing “Human Resources” by Exploiting and Exploring People’s Poten- tials (pp. 129-159). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000037009
McCann, L., Hassard, J. S., Granter, E., & Hyde, P. J. (2015). Casting the lean spell: The promotion, dilution and erosion of lean management in the NHS. Human Relations, 68(10), 1557-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714561697
Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analyisis: A Methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Los Ángeles: Sage Publications.
Mol, M. J., & Birkinshaw, J. (2009). The sources of management in- novation: When firms introduce new management practices. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1269–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.001
Moody, K. (2014). Competition and conflict: Union growth in the US hospital industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X12462491
Parker, M. (2002). Against management: Organization in the age of managerialism. Cambridge: Blackwell .
Parker, M. (2013). Imagining alternatives. En M. Parker, G. Cheney, V. Fournier, & C. Land (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Al- ternative Organization (pp. 31–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203725351.ch3
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
Planet Lean. (2019). Planet lean. https://planet-lean.com/lean-companies/
Pulido-Martínez, H. C., & Sato, L. (2013). ...Y entonces ¿esto de la crítica qué es? De la relaciones entre la psicología y el mundo del trabajo. Universitas Psychologica, 12(4), 1355-1368. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-4.rpmt
Rampasso, I. S., Anholon, R., Gonçalves-Quelhas, O. L., & Filho, W. L. (2017). Primary problems associated with the health and welfare of employees observed when implementing lean manufacturing projects. Work, 58(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172632
Ratner, H. (2012). “It was The Night of The Long Knives”: When public management collides with group identities. Public Management Review, 14(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589612
Ríos, N., Toro, J., Pérez-Arrau, G., Mandiola, M., & Espejo, A. (2018). ¿Estudios rganizacionales en Chile? Entre la parcelación, la ambigüedad y las racionalidades en disputa. Psicoperspectivas, 17(3), 1-14. http://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol17-Issue3-fulltext-1389
Rodríguez, J. K., & Stewart, P. (2017). HRM and work practices in Chile: the regulatory power of organisational culture. Employee Relations, 39(3), 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2017-0034
Rosin, F., Forget, P., Lamouri, S., & Pellerin, R. (2020). Impacts of industry 4.0 technologies on lean principles. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1644-1661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1672902
Rother, M., & Aulinger, G. (2018) Cultura Toyota Kata. Cómo desarrollar la capacidad y la mentalidad de su organización a través de la kata de coaching. Barcelona: Profit editorial
Santos, M. J. (2017). LP impacts on the neoliberal political-economic context. En C. Machado & J. Davim (Eds.), Green and Lean Management (pp. 17-36). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44909-8_2
Smith, V. (1997). New forms of work organization. Annual Review Sociology, 23, 315–339. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2952554
Srnicek, N. (2018). Capitalismo de plataformas. Buenos Aires: Caja Negra editora.
Stecher, A. (2014). El campo de investigación sobre transformaciones del trabajo, identidades y subjetividad en la modernidad contemporánea. Apuntes desde Chile y América Latina. En A. Stecher & L. Godoy (Eds.), Transformaciones del trabajo, subjetividades e identidades. Lecturas psicosociales desde Chile y América Latina. (pp. 19-76). Santiago de Chile: ril Editores. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339149225_El_Campo_de_Investigacion_sobre_Transformaciones_del_Trabajo_Identidades_y_Subjetividad_en_la_Modernidad_Contemporanea_Apuntes_desde_Chile_y_America_Latina
Stecher, A., & Soto Roy, Á. (2019). Crisis and transformation of occupational identities in three sectors (retail, mining, state): Contributions to understanding workplace subjectivities in neoliberal Chile. Subjectivity, 12, 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-019-00080-x
Stenger, E., Monteiro, M. I., Sabino, M. O., Miquilin, I. de O. C., & Filho, H. R. C. (2014). Lean production e riscos psicossociais: o caso de uma fusão multinacional de grupo metalmecânico no Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30(8), 1765–1776. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102311X00076813
Stewart, P., Danford, A., Richardson, M., & Pulignano, V. (2010). Workers’ experiences of skill, training and participation in lean and high performance workplaces in Britain and Italy. Employee Relations, 32(6), 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451011083654
Stewart, P., Mrozowicki, A., Danford, A., & Murphy, K. (2016). Lean as ideology and practice: A comparative study of the impact of lean production on working life in automotive manufacturing in the United Kingdom and Poland. Competition & Change, 20(3), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529416636192
Strangleman, T., & Roberts, I. (1999). Looking through the window of op- portunity: The cultural cleansing of workplace identity. Sociology, 33(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038599000036
Szlechter, D., Solearte, L., Teixeira, J., Feregrino, J., Madariaga, P., & Alcadipani, R. (2020). Estudios organizacionales en América La- tina: Hacia una agenda de investigación. Revista de Adminis- tra-ção de Empresas, 60(2), 84-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020200202
Terry, G., Hayfileld, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. En C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 17-36). Londres: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n2
Thomas, A., Lubarsky, S., Durning, S. J., & Young, M. E. (2017). Knowledge syntheses in medical education: Demystifying scoping reviews. Academic Medicine, 92(2), 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452
Thompson, P., & Smith, C. (2010). Working life: Renewing labour process analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Red Globe Press
Tricco, A., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., … Straus, S. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
Vallas, S. (1999). Rethinking post-fordism: The meaning of workplace flexibility. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 68-101 https://www.jstor.org/stable/201927
Vallas, S., Finlay, W., & Wharton, A. (2009). The sociology of work: Structures and inequalities. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Van Grinsven, M., Sturdy, A., & Heusinkveld, S. (2019). Identities in translation: Management concepts as means and outcomes of identity work. Organization Studies, 41(6), 873-897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619866490
Waring, J. J., & Bishop, S. (2010). Lean healthcare: Rhetoric, ritual and resistance. Social Science & Medicine, 71(7), 1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.028
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (2017). La máquina que cambió el mundo. Barcelona: Profit editorial.
Zhang, L. (2008). Lean production and labor controls in the Chinese au- tomobile industry in an age of globalization. International Labor and Working Class History, 73(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547908000033
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Oscar Raul Delgado Ortiz, Gustavo Adolfo Montoya Cárdenas. (2022). Kaizen Methodology: literature review and implementation analysis. Journal of Scientific and Technological Research Industrial, 3(2), p.26. https://doi.org/10.47422/jstri.v3i2.28.
2. Lorena María Coba Quintana, Renato Daniel Basantes Silva, Andrea Isabel Durán Goyes. (2025). La vulneración del derecho a la estabilidad laboral en el contexto del teletrabajo en el Ecuador. Esprint Investigación, 4(1), p.27. https://doi.org/10.61347/ei.v4i1.92.
3. Ramon Evangelista dos Anjos Paiva, Thiffany Nayara Bento de Morais, Ketyllem Tayanne da Silva Costa, Renan Cipriano Moioli, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli da Costa Oliveira, Fábia Barbosa de Andrade, Hamed Aghaei. (2025). Occupational accident fatalities in Brazil: A time series study from 2011 to 2021. PLOS ONE, 20(4), p.e0321550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321550.
4. Liz Sobeida Salirrosas Navarro, Alfonzo Mauro Guerra Chacón, Juan Alfredo Tuesta Panduro, Rina Álvarez Becerra. (2022). Gobierno digital y modernización en entidades públicas peruanas: revisión sistemática de literatura. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(100), p.1376. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.100.6.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Innovar
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0.
Todos los artículos publicados por Innovar se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Una vez seleccionados los artículos para un número, y antes de iniciar la etapa de cuidado y producción editorial, los autores deben firmar una cesión de derechos patrimoniales de su obra. Innovar se ciñe a las normas colombianas en materia de derechos de autor.
El material de esta revista puede ser reproducido o citado con carácter académico, citando la fuente.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons:
