Publicado

2023-08-21

How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa

¿Cómo desarrollar revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura en administración utilizando SyReMa?

Como desenvolver revisões sistemáticas da literatura de gestão usando o SyReMa?

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156

Palabras clave:

evidence-based management, literature review, management research, methodology, publications, scientific article, systematic review (en)
gestión basada en evidencia, revisión de literatura, investigación en gestión, metodología, publicaciones, artículo científico, revisión sistemática (es)
gestão baseada em evidências, revisão da literatura, pesquisa em gestão, metodologia, publicações, artigo científico, revisão sistemática (pt)

Autores/as

The systematic literature review (slr) method is becoming more prevalent in the field of management and administration. It is a research method that involves the selection, analysis, and evaluation of the best available evidence in a given thematic area. However, slr must follow a series of steps that allow its replicability, and it must satisfy several minimum requirements to ensure validity. The present study provides a tool that outlines these steps and requirements. We first examined the instruments that are used in other disciplines along with the editorial standards for publication in journals in the field. Subsequently, we developed a checklist and had it validated by experts using the Delphi method. The checklist for reporting management literature review systems—SyReMa—contains 32 items divided into the following sections: general aspects, introduction, methodology, synthesis of results, discussion, and conclusions. Each item should be evaluated in terms of whether it is present in the slr; whether it is clear or requires greater precision and whether it is applicable, given the characteristics of the subject matter. The SyReMa checklist will help authors, editors, reviewers, and readers improve the quality and accuracy of slrs and clarify the contributions they make. It could also be used as a teaching tool for future researchers.

El método de revisión sistemática de la literatura (rsl) ha ganado cada vez más relevancia en el campo de los estudios en gestión. Este es un método de investigación que incluye la selección, el análisis y la evaluación de la evidencia más destacada en torno a una temática específica. Sin embargo, la rsl debe llevar a cabo una serie de pasos para asegurar su replicabilidad y el cumplimiento de requisitos mínimos para sustentar su validez. Por ello, la presente investigación proporciona una herramienta que detalla cada uno de estos pasos y requisitos. En primer lugar, examinamos los instrumentos empleados por otras disciplinas y los estándares editoriales para la publicación en revistas científicas. Posteriormente, desarrollamos una lista de verificación que fue sometida a valoración de expertos mediante el método Delphi. La lista de verificación para informar sobre los sistemas de revisión de la literatura en gestión, denominada SyReMa, consta de 32 ítems divididos en las siguientes categorías: aspectos generales, introducción, metodología, síntesis de resultados, discusión y conclusiones. Cada uno de estos ítems debe ser analizado para determinar si está presente en la rsl, si su abordaje es claro o requiere mayor precisión y si este es aplicable, dadas las características del tema analizado. La lista de chequeo SyReMa permitirá que los autores, editores, revisores y lectores puedan mejorar la calidad y precisión de las rsl, así como tener mayor claridad sobre su contribución al campo de la gestión. Además, esta herramienta podría utilizarse como recurso educativo para los investigadores en formación.

O método de revisão sistemática da literatura (RSL) tem ganhado cada vez mais relevância no campo dos estudos de gestão. Esse é um método de pesquisa que envolve a seleção, a análise e a avaliação das evidências mais importantes sobre um tópico específico. No entanto, a RSL deve executar uma série de etapas para garantir sua replicabilidade e o cumprimento de requisitos mínimos para sustentar sua validade. Portanto, esta pesquisa fornece uma ferramenta que detalha cada uma dessas etapas e requisitos. Primeiro, examinamos os instrumentos usados por outras disciplinas e os padrões editoriais para a publicação em revistas científicas. Em seguida, desenvolvemos uma lista de verificação que foi submetida à avaliação de especialistas usando o método Delphi. A lista de verificação para relatar sistemas de revisão de literatura gerencial, denominada SyReMa, consiste em 32 itens divididos nas seguintes categorias: aspectos gerais, introdução, metodologia, síntese de resultados, discussão e conclusões. Cada um desses itens deve ser analisado para determinar se está presente na SLR, se sua abordagem é clara ou requer mais precisão e se é aplicável, dadas as características do tópico analisado. A lista de verificação SyReMa permitirá que autores, editores, revisores e leitores melhorem a qualidade e a precisão desse tipo de revisão, bem como tenham mais clareza sobre sua contribuição para o campo da gestão. Além disso, essa ferramenta pode ser usada como um recurso educacional para pesquisadores em treinamento.

Referencias

Berry, K. J., Paul, W., & Mielke, J. (1988). A generalization of Cohen’s Kappa agreement measure to interval measurement and multiple raters. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(4), 921-933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488484007

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003

Botella, J., & Zamora, Á. (2017). El meta-análisis: una metodología para la investigación en educación. Educación XX1, 20(2), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.18241

Chicaíza-Becerra, L. A., Riaño-Casallas, M. I., Rojas-Berrio, S. P., & Garzón-Santos, C. (2017). Revisión sistemática de la literatura en administración. Documentos Escuela de Administración y Contaduría Pública, 29, 18.

Cumpston, M. (n.d.). Introducción al metanálisis. Cochrane Training. https://training.cochrane.org/es/resource/introducción-al-metanálisis

Donohoe, H., & Needham, R. (2008). Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutions. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(5), 415-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.709

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Durach, C. F., Kembro, J., & Wieland, A. (2017). A new paradigm for systematic literature reviews in supply chain management. J Supply Chain Manag, 53, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145

Fayezi, S., Zutshi, A., & O’Loughlin, A. (2017). Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: A structured literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 379-407. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12096

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Revisión sistemática de literatura en los Trabajos de Final de Máster y en las Tesis Doctorales [Seminar]. University of Salamanca. https://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/813

Gelvis, L., Osorio, M., Riaño-Casallas, M. I., & Rojas-Berrio, S. (2021). Lineamientos, estándares y normas editoriales de revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura en la administración. Entramado, 17(2), 74-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18041/1900-3803/entramado.2.7682

Gilal, F. G., Zhang, J., Paul, J., & Gilal, N. G. (2019). The role of self-determination theory in marketing science: An integrative review and agenda for research. European Management Journal, 37(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.10.004

Gisbert, J., & Bonfill, X. (2004). ¿Cómo realizar, evaluar y utilizar revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis? Gastroenterología Hepatol, 27(3), 129-149. https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-gastroenterologia-hepatologia-14-pdf-S0210570503791109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0210-5705(03)79110-9

Gómez-Núñez, A. J., Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Batagelj, V., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2016). Visualization and analysis of Scimago Journal & Country Rank structure via journal clustering. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 68(5), 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2015-0205

Greenhalgh, T., & Peacock, R. (2005). Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ, 331(7524), 1064-1065. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68

Guirao-Goris, J. A., Salas, A. O., & Ferrandis, E. F. (2008). El artículo de revisión. Revista Iberoamericana de Enfermeria Comunitaria, 1(1), 1-25. http://revista.enfermeriacomunitaria.org/articuloCompleto.php?ID=7.Consultadoel23/07/2008

Hall, G. (2003). How to write a paper. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing (3rd ed.). BMJ Books. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-9004(98)80069-1

Hao, A. W., Paul, J., Trott, S., Guo, C., & Wu, H.-H. (2019). Two decades of research on nation branding: A review and future research agenda. International Marketing Review, 38(1), 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-01-2019-0028

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/sam/doing-a-literature-review/book257278#contents

Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x

Hiebl, M. R. W. (2021). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851

Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. [Eds]. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane. www.cochrane-handbook.org

Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. [Eds.]. (2021). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane. https://training.cochrane.org/

Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.

JBI Global. (2020). Checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI systematic reviews. JBI Global. https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2020-08/Checklist_for_Systematic_Reviews_and_Research_Syntheses.pdf

Jonnalagadda, S. R., Goyal, P., & Huffman, M. D. (2015). Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7

Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2020). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678

Manterola, C., Astudillo, P., Arias, E., & Claros, N. (2013). Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura. Qué se debe saber acerca de ellas. Cirugía Española, 91(3), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.07.009

Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Guthrie, J. (2016). On the shoulders of giants: Undertaking a structured literature review in accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), 767-801. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, T. P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Pagani, R. N., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi ordinatio: A proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2109-2135. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-015-1744-X

Paraskevas, A., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). Beyond consensus: An alternative use of Delphi enquiry in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 907-924. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111211247236

Paul, J., & Benito, G. R. G. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316

Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717

Paul, J., Parthasarathy, S., & Gupta, P. (2017). Exporting challenges of SMEs: A review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003

Pérez-Rave, J. (2012). Revisión sistemática de literatura en ingeniería. Universidad de Antioquia.

Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2001). Expert opinions in forecasting: Role of the Delphi technique. In J. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of forecasting (pp. 125-144). Kluwer Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3_7

Sanderson, S., Tatt, I. D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2007). Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: A systematic review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(3), 666-676. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym018

Sergi, F., & Serra, V. (2019). La evaluación de la calidad de los estudios incluidos en revisiones sistemáticas. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339658369_La_evaluacion_de_la_calidad_de_los_estudios_incluidos_en_revisiones_sistematicas

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) 2015 checklist: Recommended items to address in a systematic review protocol. BMJ, 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Valentine, J. C. (2009). Judging the quality of primary research. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis & Meta-Analysis (pp. 130-144). Russell Sage Foundation.

Velásquez, J. D. (2014). Una guía corta para escribir revisiones sistemáticas de literatura. Parte 1. DYNA, 81(187), 9-10. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n187.46758

Watson, R., & Webster, J. (2020). Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review a roadmap for release 2.0. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(3), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1798591

Wentz, E. A. (2017). The literature review. In E. A. Wentz (Ed.), How to design, write, and present a successful dissertation proposal (pp. 81-95). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506374710

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 13.23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319

Cómo citar

APA

Riaño Casallas, M. I. & Rojas-Berrio, S. (2023). How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa. Innovar, 34(92), e99156. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156

ACM

[1]
Riaño Casallas, M.I. y Rojas-Berrio, S. 2023. How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa. Innovar. 34, 92 (sep. 2023), e99156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156.

ACS

(1)
Riaño Casallas, M. I.; Rojas-Berrio, S. How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa. Innovar 2023, 34, e99156.

ABNT

RIAÑO CASALLAS, M. I.; ROJAS-BERRIO, S. How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 34, n. 92, p. e99156, 2023. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99156. Acesso em: 27 dic. 2025.

Chicago

Riaño Casallas, Martha Isabel, y Sandra Rojas-Berrio. 2023. «How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa». Innovar 34 (92):e99156. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156.

Harvard

Riaño Casallas, M. I. y Rojas-Berrio, S. (2023) «How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa», Innovar, 34(92), p. e99156. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156.

IEEE

[1]
M. I. Riaño Casallas y S. Rojas-Berrio, «How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa», Innovar, vol. 34, n.º 92, p. e99156, sep. 2023.

MLA

Riaño Casallas, M. I., y S. Rojas-Berrio. «How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa». Innovar, vol. 34, n.º 92, septiembre de 2023, p. e99156, doi:10.15446/innovar.v34n92.99156.

Turabian

Riaño Casallas, Martha Isabel, y Sandra Rojas-Berrio. «How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa». Innovar 34, no. 92 (septiembre 5, 2023): e99156. Accedido diciembre 27, 2025. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99156.

Vancouver

1.
Riaño Casallas MI, Rojas-Berrio S. How to Report Systematic Literature Reviews in Management Using SyReMa. Innovar [Internet]. 5 de septiembre de 2023 [citado 27 de diciembre de 2025];34(92):e99156. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99156

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Paula Andrea Navarro Pérez, Zuray Melgarejo, Mary Analí Vera-Colina. (2024). Gestión empresarial y desempeño en las Pymes desde la mirada de las finanzas comportamentales. Una Revisión Sistemática de la Literatura. Innovar, 34(94), p.e116809. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v34n94.116809.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

635

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.