Publicado

2019-07-01

Impacto de las condiciones sociodemográficas sobre el control prenatal en Latinoamérica

Impact of sociodemographic conditions on prenatal care in Latin America

Palabras clave:

Atención prenatal, Accesibilidad a los servicios de salud, Embarazo (es)
Prenatal Care, Health Services Accessibility, Pregnancy (en)

Autores/as

  • Nasly Violedy Ipia-Ordóñez Clínica la Estancia - Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos
  • Darío Fernando Ortega-Vallejo Clínica DESA - Servicio de Consulta Externa
  • Piedad Andrea Acosta-Mora Fundación Hospital San Pedro - Servicio de Urgencias
  • William Andrés López-Lasso Hospital Universitario San José - Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos
  • Jhon Edward Martínez-Rodríguez Hospital Universitario San José - Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos
  • Norma Constanza Corrales-Zúñiga Clínica Comfandi - Servicio de Consulta Externa
  • Carlos Andrés Rosero-Montero Clínica la Estancia - Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos
  • Anuar Alonso Cedeño-Burbano Universidad del Cauca - Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud - Programa de Especialización en Anestesiología

Introducción. El control prenatal corresponde a una estrategia encaminada a prevenir las posibles complicaciones del embarazo, el parto y el puerperio. Diversos estudios aislados se han realizado para identificar factores que pueden afectar de forma negativa el control prenatal.

Objetivo. Realizar una síntesis cualitativa de la literatura respecto al impacto de las condiciones sociodemográficas sobre el control prenatal en Latinoamérica.

Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura a junio de 2018 en las bases de datos EBSCO, Embase, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE-PubMed y Google Scholar, con los términos “prenatal care” AND “Health services accessibility” AND “Pregnancy, Health services accessibility” AND “Pregnancy, prenatal care” AND “Health services accessibility” y sin límite de tiempo.

Resultados. Se encontraron 13 artículos con información relevante para el desarrollo de la presente revisión.

Conclusiones. La literatura disponible sugiere que condiciones sociodemográficas desfavorables podrían incidir de manera negativa sobre el control prenatal. El cuidado del hogar, la atención de otros hijos, la afiliación al sistema de seguridad social, la obligación laboral y el desempleo parecen ser los principales factores que afectan la calidad del mismo.

Introduction: Prenatal care is a strategy aimed at preventing the possible complications of pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period. Several isolated studies have been conducted to identify factors that may negatively affect prenatal care.

Objective: To make a qualitative synthesis of the literature regarding the impact of sociodemographic conditions on prenatal care in Latin America.

Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted in June 2018 on the EBSCO, Embase, ScienceDirect, LILACS, SciELO, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE-PubMed and Google Scholar databases, with the terms “prenatal care” AND “Health services accessibility” AND “Pregnancy, Health services accessibility” AND “Pregnancy, prenatal care” AND “Health services accessibility”, without a time frame.

Results: Thirteen articles were found with information relevant to the development of the present review.

Conclusions: The available literature suggests that unfavourable socio-demographic conditions may have a negative impact on prenatal care. Household care, care of other children, affiliation to the social security system, obligation to work and unemployment seem to be the main factors affecting the quality of the system.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Cáceres-Manrique FM. El control prenatal: una reflexión urgente. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2009;60(2):165-70.

Minakami H, Maeda T, Fujii T, Hamada H, Iitsuka Y, Itakura A, et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2014 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(6):1469-99. http://doi.org/c4hh.

Costello A, Osrin D, Manandhar D. Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality in the poorest communities. BMJ. 2004;329(7475):1166-8. http://doi.org/c2rgq9.

Haines A, Cassels A. Can the millennium development goals be attained? BMJ. 2004;329(7462):394-7. http://doi.org/cm6k8d.

Maine D, Rosenfield A. The Safe Motherhood Initiative: why has it stalled? Am J Public Health. 1999;89(4):480-2. http://doi.org/d3xsd7.

Delgado-Noguera M, Daza-Córdoba C. Factores que afectan el proceso de vigilancia epidemiológica de la mortalidad materna en el departamento del Cauca. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2000;51(2):71-6.

Gortmaker SL. The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn. Am J Public Health. 1979;69(7):653-60. http://doi.org/fpz2mm.

Shiono P, Klebanoff M, Graubard B, Berendes H, Rhoads G. Birth weight among women of different ethnic groups. JAMA. 1986;255(1):48-52. http://doi.org/b68vsr.

Murray JL, Bernfield M. The differential effect of prenatal care on the incidence of low birth weight among blacks and whites in a prepaid health care plan. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(21):1385-91. http://doi.org/cx7mrw.

Tyson J, Guzick D, Rosenfeld CR, Lasky R, Gant N, Jiminez J, et al. Prenatal care evaluation and cohort analyses. Pediatrics. 1990;85(2):195-204.

Malloy MH, Kao TC, Lee YJ. Analyzing the effect of prenatal care on pregnancy outcome: a conditional approach. Am J Public Health. 1992;82(3):448-50.

Mustard CA, Roos NP. The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(9):1450-7. http://doi.org/c8cj9m.

Blondel B, Pusch D, Schmidt E. Some characteristics of antenatal care in 13 European countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(6):565-8. http://doi.org/dhpqfn.

Barros H, Tavares M, Rodrigues T. Role of prenatal care in preterm birth and low birthweight in Portugal. J Public Health Med. 1996;18(3):321-8. http://doi.org/c4hj.

Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(4):306-16. http://doi.org/dsmvjn.

Alexander GR, Cornely DA. Racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes: the role of prenatal care utilization and maternal risk status. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3(5):254-61. http://doi.org/c4jf.

Mor JM, Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Kieffer EC, Hulsey TC. Determinants of prenatal care use in Hawaii: implications for health promotion. Am J Prev Med. 1995;11(2):79-85. http://doi.org/c4jg.

Vecino-Ortiz A. Determinants of demand for antenatal care in Colombia. Health Policy. 2008;86(2-3):363-72. http://doi.org/dzxs3n.

Carroli G, Villar J, Piaggio G, Khan-Neelofur D, Gülmezoglu M, Mugford M, et al. WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357(9268):1565-70. http://doi.org/fq4mrh.

Santos-Neto ET, Oliveira AE, Zandonade E, Leal Mdo C. Access to prenatal care: assessment of the adequacy of different indices. Cad Saude Publica. 2013;29(8):1664-74. http://doi.org/c4jh.

Dowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelfur D, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD000934. http://doi.org/bs5kmc.

Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(10):812-9. http://doi.org/c4jj.

Al-Nadhedh N. Factors affecting the choice of maternal and child health services in a rural area of Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 1995;1(2):261-9.

Magadi MA, Agwanda AO, Obare FO. A comparative analysis of the use of maternal health services between teenagers and older mothers in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(6):1311-25. http://doi.org/dhhpq5.

Glei DA, Goldman N. Understanding ethnic variation in pregnancy-related care in rural Guatemala. Ethn Health. 2000;5(1):5-22. http://doi.org/dq3c9c.

Pallikadavath S, Foss M, Stones RW. Antenatal care: provision and inequality in rural north India. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(6):1147-58. http://doi.org/frnfhw.

Gyimah SO, Takyi BK, Addai I. Challenges to the reproductive-health needs of African women: on religion and maternal health utilization in Ghana. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(12):2930-44. http://doi.org/dn7jhf.

Glei DA, Goldman N, Rodríguez G. Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter? Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2447-63. http://doi.org/dm4b3j.

Li J. Gender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(4):695-708. http://doi.org/cdjct2.

Nwakoby BN. Use of obstetric services in rural Nigeria. J R Soc Health. 1994;114(3):132-6. http://doi.org/bb9kwk.

McCray TM. An issue of culture: the effects of daily activities on prenatal care utilization patterns in rural South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(9):1843-55. http://doi.org/dbvn3n.

Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH. Utilization of delivery services at the primary health care level in rural Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(12):2585-95. http://doi.org/bqtx6g.

Mendoza-Tascón LA, Arias-Guatiboza MD, Peñaranda-Ospina CB, Mendoza-Tascón LI, Manzano-Penagos S, Varela-Bahena AM. Influencia de la adolescencia y su entorno en la adherencia al control prenatal e impacto sobre la prematuridad, bajo peso al nacer y mortalidad neonatal. Rev. Chil. Obstet. ginecol. 2015;80(4):306-15. http://doi.org/c4jm.

Miranda-Mellano C. Factores de capacidad en el uso de control prenatal adecuado en gestantes de Sincelejo (Colombia). Salud Uninorte. 2016;32(3):436-51.

Moya-Plata D, Guiza-Salazar IJ, Mora-Merchan MA. Ingreso Temprano al Control Prenatal en una Unidad Materno Infantil. Rev Cuid. 2010;1(1):44-52. http://doi.org/c4jp.

Díaz-Martínez LA, Cáceres-Manrique FM, Becerra-Mojica CH, Pérez-Vera L, Uscátegui-Dacarett AM. Causas y Determinantes de la Mortalidad Perinatal, Bucaramanga, 1999. MedUNAB. 2000;3(7):5-16.

Huanco D, Ticona M, Ticona M, Huanco F. Frecuencia y repercusiones maternas y perinatales del embarazo en adolescentes atendidas en hospitales del Ministerio de Salud del Perú, año 2008. Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol. 2012;77(2):122-8. http://doi.org/c4jq.

Faneite P, Rivera C, Rodríguez F, Amato R, Moreno S, Cangemi L. Consulta prenatal: motivos de inasistencia, ¿se justifica? Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2009;69(3):147-51.

Pécora A, San Martín ME, Cantero A, Furfaro K, Jankovic MP, Llompart V. Control prenatal tardío: ¿barreras en el sistema de salud? Revista del Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sardá. 2008;27(3):114-9.

Ramírez-Zetina M, Richardson V, Ávila H, Caraveo VE, Salomón RE, Bacardí M, et al. La atención prenatal en la ciudad fronteriza de Tijuana, México. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2000;7(2):97-101.

Domingues RM, Leal Mdo C, Hartz ZM, Dias MA, Vettore MV. Access to and utilization of prenatal care services in the Unified Health System of the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2013;16(4):953-65. http://doi.org/f6bhkd.

Stein A, Ferreira A. Accesibilidad al primer control de embarazo en un centro de salud de la ciudad de Montevideo. Enfermería: cuidados humanizados. 2012;1(1):11-9.

Verde ME, Varela L, Episcopo C, García R, Briozzo L, Impallomeni I, et al. Embarazo sin control: Análisis epidemiológico. Rev. Méd. Urug. 2012;28(2):100-7.

Poffald L, Hirmas M, Aguilera X, Vega J, González MJ, Sanhueza G. Barreras y facilitadores para el control prenatal en adolescentes: resultados de un estudio cualitativo en Chile. Salud pública Méx. 2013;55(6):572-9.

Quelopana-del Valle AM, Champion JD, Salazar-González BC. Factores Psicosociales que Influyen el Inicio del Control Prenatal. Desarrollo Cientif Enferm. 2007;15(3):102-6.

Villar J, Ba’aqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizán J, Farnot U, et al. WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357(9268):1551-64. http://doi.org/dsvtdk.

Villar J, Bergsjø P. Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(1):1-14. http://doi.org/bxm97h.

Bergsjø P, Villar J. Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. II. Power to eliminate or alleviate adverse newborn outcomes; some special conditions and examinations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76(1):15-25. http://doi.org/cfhzz4.

Villar J, Carroli G, Khan-Neelfur D, Piaggio G, Gülmezoglu M. Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD000934. http://doi.org/cv3h6q.

Essex C, Counsell AM, Geddis DC. The demographic characteristics of early and late attenders for antenatal care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;32(4):306-8. http://doi.org/dm2p8b.

Petitti D, Coleman C, Binsacca D, Allen B. Early prenatal care in urban black and white women. Birth. 1990;17(1):1-5. http://doi.org/d9f7cm.

Melnikow J, Alemagno S. Adequacy of prenatal care among inner-city women. J Fam Pract. 1993;37(6):575-82.

LaVeist TA, Keith VM, Gutierrez ML. Black/white differences in prenatal care utilization: an assessment of predisposing and enabling factors. Health Serv Res. 1995;30(1):43-58.

Roberts RO, Yawn BP, Wickes SL, Field CS, Garretson M, Jacobsen SJ. Barriers to prenatal care: factors associated with late initiation of care in a middle-class midwestern community. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(1):53-61.

Blondel B, Kaminski M, Breart G. Antenatal care and maternal demographic and social characteristics. Evolution in France between 1972 and 1976. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980;34(3):157-63. http://doi.org/c7m6r6.

Buekens P. Variations in provision and uptake of antenatal care. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;4(1):187-205. http://doi.org/dnvh68.

Brown S. Drawing women into prenatal care. Family Planning Perspectives. 1989;21(2):73-88. http://doi.org/dnz53v.

Joseph CL. Identification of factors associated with delayed antenatal care. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989;81(1):57-63.