Published

2017-01-01

Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays

Determinación de la toxicidad de lixiviados a través de toxicidad aguda utilizando Daphnia pulex y ensayos de toxicidad anaerobia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220

Keywords:

Daphnia pulex, leachate, municipal landfill, anaerobic toxicity (en)
Daphnia pulex, lixiviado, relleno sanitario municipal, toxicidad anaerobia (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Patricia Torres Lozada Escuela de Ingeniería de Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente - EIDENAR Grupo de Investigación Estudio y Control de la Contaminación Ambiental - ECCA Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad del Valle https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-6677
  • Yazmín Stefhany Carabalí Rivera Escuela de Ingeniería de Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente - EIDENAR Grupo de Investigación Estudio y Control de la Contaminación Ambiental - ECCA Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad del Valle
  • Luz Edith Barba Ho Escuela de Ingeniería de Recursos Naturales y del Ambiente - EIDENAR Grupo de Investigación Estudio y Control de la Contaminación Ambiental - ECCA Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad del Valle
The municipal solid waste (MSW) of large cities, in particular in developing countries, is mainly disposed of in landfills (LFs), whose inadequate management generates the emission of greenhouse gases and the production of leachates with high concentrations of organic and inorganic matter and occasionally heavy metals. In this study, the toxicity of the leachates from an intermediate-age municipal landfill was evaluated by ecotoxicity and anaerobic digestion tests. The acute toxicity assays with Daphnia pulex presented a toxic unit (TU) value of 49.5%, which indicates that these leachates should not be directly discharged into water sources or percolate into the soil because they would affect the ecosystems served by these waters. According to statistical analyses, the leachate toxicity is mainly associated with the inorganic fraction, with chlorides, calcium hardness and calcium having the greatest influence on the toxicity. The anaerobic toxicity assays showed that in the exposure stage, the methanogenic activity exceeded that of the control, which suggests that the anaerobic bacteria easily adapted to the leachate. Therefore, this treatment could be an alternative to mitigate the toxicity of the studied leachates. The inhibition presented in the recovery stage, represented by a reduction of the methanogenic activity, could arise because the amount of supplied substrate was not enough to fulfill the carbon and nutrient requirements of the bacterial population present.
The municipal solid waste (MSW) of large cities, in particular the ones of developing countries, is mainly disposed in landfills (LFs), whose inadequate management generates the emission of greenhouse gases and the production of leachates with high concentrations of organic and inorganic matter and, occasionally heavy metals. In this study, the toxicity of the leachates from an intermediate-age municipal landfill was evaluated by ecotoxicity and anaerobic toxicity tests. The acute toxicity assays with Daphnia pulex presented a toxic unit (TU) value of 49.5%, which indicates that these leachates should not be directly discharged into water sources or percolate into the soil because they would affect the ecosystems related to these waters. According to statistical analyses, the leachate toxicity is mainly associated with the inorganic fraction, having the chlorides, calcium hardness and, calcium as the greatest influences on the toxicity. The anaerobic toxicity test showed that in the exposure stage, the methanogenic activity exceeded the control one, which suggests that the anaerobic bacteria easily adapted to the leachate. Therefore, this treatment could be an alternative to mitigate the toxicity of the studied leachates. The inhibition presented in the recovery stage, represented by a reduction of the methanogenic activity, may be because the amount of supplied substrate was not enough to fulfill the carbon and nutrient requirements of the bacterial population present.
RII37VOL1_Art2_54220

 

Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays

Determinación de la toxicidad de lixiviados a través de toxicidad aguda utilizando Daphnia pulex y ensayos de toxicidad anaerobia

Y. S. Carabalí-Rivera 1, L. E. Barba-Ho 2, and P. Torres-Lozada 3


1Bachelor in Chemistry, Universidad del Valle, Colombia. Affiliation: Escuela EIDENAR, ECCA Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Colombia. E-mail: yazmin.carabali@correounivalle.edu.co.

1MSc. in Chemistry, Universidad del Valle, Colombia. Affiliation: Escuela EIDENAR, ECCA Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Colombia. E-mail: luz.barba@correounivalle.edu.co.

1PhD. in Civil Engineering: Hydraulic area and sanitation. Universidad São Paulo. Brasil. Affiliation: Escuela EIDENAR, ECCA Research Group, Universidad del Valle, Colombia. E-mail: patricia.torres@correounivalle.edu.co


How to cite: Carabalí-Rivera, Y., Barba-Ho L.E., and Torres-Lozada, P. (2017). Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays. Ingeniería e Investigación, 37(1), 16–24.

 

DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220.


ABSTRACT

The municipal solid waste (MSW) of large cities, in particular the ones of developing countries, is mainly disposed in landfills (LFs), whose inadequate management generates the emission of greenhouse gases and the production of leachates with high concentrations of organic and inorganic matter and, occasionally heavy metals. In this study, the toxicity of the leachates from an intermediate-age municipal landfill was evaluated by ecotoxicity and anaerobic toxicity tests. The acute toxicity assays with Daphnia pulex presented a toxic unit (TU) value of 49,5%, which indicates that these leachates should not be directly discharged into water sources or percolate into the soil because they would affect the ecosystems related to these waters. According to statistical analyses, the leachate toxicity is mainly associated with the inorganic fraction, having the chlorides, calcium hardness and, calcium as the greatest influences on the toxicity. The anaerobic toxicity test showed that in the exposure stage, the methanogenic activity exceeded the control one, which suggests that the anaerobic bacteria easily adapted to the leachate. Therefore, this treatment could be an alternative to mitigate the toxicity of the studied leachates. The inhibition presented in the recovery stage, represented by a reduction of the methanogenic activity, may be because the amount of supplied substrate was not enough to fulfill the carbon and nutrient requirements of the bacterial population present.


Keywords: Daphnia pulex, leachate, municipal landfill, anaerobic toxicity.


RESUMEN

Los residuos sólidos municipales (RSM) de las grandes urbes, en particular las de países en desarrollo, son predominantemente arrojados en rellenos sanitarios (RS), cuyo manejo inadecuado genera la emisión de gases de efecto invernadero y la producción de lixiviados con altas concentraciones de materia orgánica e inorgánica y, ocasionalmente, de metales pesados. En este estudio se evaluó la toxicidad de los lixiviados de un relleno sanitario municipal de edad intermedia, mediante ensayos de ecotoxicidad y de toxicidad anaerobia. Los ensayos de toxicidad aguda con Daphnia pulex presentaron valores de UT de 49,5%, lo que indica que estos no deben ser vertidos directamente a fuentes de agua ni deben percolar en el suelo, pues afectarían los ecosistemas que se sirvan de estas aguas. De acuerdo con los análisis estadísticos, la toxicidad del lixiviado está asociada principalmente a la fracción inorgánica, siendo los cloruros, la dureza cálcica y el calcio los parámetros de mayor influencia. Los ensayos de toxicidad anaerobia mostraron que en la etapa de exposición la actividad metanogénica superó a la del control, lo que sugiere que las bacterias anaerobias se adaptaron fácilmente al lixiviado y, por lo tanto, esta puede ser una alternativa de tratamiento para mitigar la toxicidad de los lixiviados estudiados. La inhibición presentada en la etapa de recuperación, representada en una reducción de la actividad metanogénica, puede deberse a que la cantidad de sustrato suministrada no fue suficiente para abastecer los requerimientos de carbono y nutrientes de la población bacteriana presente.


Palabras clave: Daphnia pulex, lixiviado, relleno sanitario municipal, toxicidad anaerobia.


Received: November 17th 2015

Accepted: March 6th 2017


Introduction

Municipal solid wastes (MSW) have been increasing due to factors such as population growth, elevated levels of urbanization and the massive consumption of different products (Eriksson & Bisaillon, 2011). For this reason, one of the major challenges in large urban areas, in particular the ones located in developing countries, is the management of municipal solid wastes (Moeinaddini et al., 2010), with landfills being the most-used final disposal method worldwide (Hoornweg & Bhada-Tata, 2012). In Colombia, approximately 30 thousand tons are generated per day, and only 13% is recovered through alternative systems, so the remaining 87% goes to landfills (SSPD, 2010).

In landfills in operation for 30 years or less, at least four stages of decomposition occur: initial aerobic, acid anaerobic, initial methanogenic and stable methanogenic; however, factors such as MSW composition, climatic conditions like rainfall and infiltration, the mode of operation such as the leachate recirculation, and the implementation of aeration procedures can affect the degradation rates and times of MSW (Kjeldsen et al., 2002) and leachate composition (Lee et al., 2010).

MSW can contain dangerous substances of organic and inorganic character, heavy metals and xenobiotic compounds (Wiszniowski et al., 2006 and Aziz et al., 2010). If not treated properly, these substances can cause major environmental problems, for example the emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) (CO2 and CH4) and the generation of leachates (Al-Wabel et al., 2011), resulting from the percolation of rainfall water through the mass of the wastes, the chemical and biological reactions in the landfill cells that contain the wastes, and their own water content (Boumechhour et al., 2013).

According to the operation time of the landfill, and particularly of the landfill cell from where they come from, the leachates can be classified into three groups: young (less than 5 years), intermediate (between 5-10 years) and mature (more than 10 years of operation) (Renou et al., 2008 and Shouliang et al., 2008). The adequate management of the leachates requires determining both their amount and composition as well as performing toxicity studies (El-Fadel et al., 2002), which also allows selecting adequate treatment strategies (Shouliang et al., 2008).

Ecotoxicity studies or toxicological evaluations constitute a valuable, inexpensive and effective tool for the protection, control, evaluation and classification of industrial effluents and receiving water bodies. They also allow for detecting effects that cannot be estimated by only the physicochemical characterization of the effluents (Asselman et al., 2014). To evaluate the toxicity of mixtures of chemical elements in surface waters, aquatic organisms are usually used because they are characterized by a high reproduction rate, easy handling, ecological importance, easy laboratory cultivation their sensitivity to contaminants (Silva et al., 2003), rapid analysis (48 hours) and low cost and test simplicity (Atwater et al., 1983). The microcrustaceans Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex have these characteristics (Barata et al., 2006).

Authors including Isidori et al. (2003), Cho et al. (2009), Jemec et al. (2012), Ribé et al. (2012) and Rivera-Laguna et al. (2013) have performed specific studies of ecotoxicity with leachates, finding that the use of these organisms presents significant financial and logistical advantages compared to other organisms such as fishes. In addition, the studies show that variables associated with the age and composition of the leachates, such as the pH, alkalinity, and concentration of carbonaceous and nitrogenous organic matter, heavy metals, etc., influence toxicity. In general, young leachates are more biodegradable than mature leachates (Silva et al., 2003).

Pablos et al. (2011) conducted a study to evaluate the toxicity of MSW landfill leachates through toxicity tests, including Daphnia magna to make a possible correlation between physicochemical properties and toxicity results. In this study they obtained a strong to moderate correlation of 0,85 for Daphnia, which causes high levels of ammonia, alkalinity, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and chlorides, to be potentially toxic.

In the case of Rivera-Laguna et al., (2013), they studied the influence of age on leachate toxicity using as an indicator Daphnia pulex, where they found that toxicity is inversely proportional to age with values Of UT (Toxic Units) of 83,1, 47,7 and 27,7 for young, intermediate and old leachate, respectively.

Anaerobic biological processes are widely used for treatment due to their low energy requirements, low generation of sludge and production of methane with high energy content; however, the methanogenic bacteria can be inhibited by toxic compounds such as sulfides, heavy metals, total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) (ammonium ion and ammonia), with TAN being the main inhibitor present in the leachates. Studies including those of Saucedo et al. (2007), Romero (2010), and Torres et al., (2010) found that depending on its characteristics, leachate can inhibit or limit anaerobic degradation due to its high concentrations of COD, TAN and volatile fatty acids (VFAs), particularly propionic acid.

Additionally, Torres et al. (2010) evaluated at laboratory scale, the anaerobic toxicity of pure leachates mixed with municipal wastewaters (MWW) to establish the potential toxic effect of leachate on anaerobic digestion. In the study using pure leachate, a high reduction of the SMA was founded, identifying two types of inhibition: metabolic and physiological, while in the tests using mixtures of leachate and MWW (5 and 10%), the percentage of inhibition was substantially reduced and conditions of non-toxic substrates were reached. The results suggest the potential for application of co-treatment of leachates with MWW as a suitable strategy for the management of leachate.

To make decisions to adequately manage these wastes, the potential toxicity of the leachates generated in an intermediate-age municipal landfill was evaluated in this study, performing ecotoxicity studies with the microcrustacean Daphnia pulex as an indicator species. In addition, anaerobic toxicity tests were performed to evaluate the potential application of this technology as a treatment alternative of the evaluated leachates.

 

Materials and Methods

Leachate characterization

The studied leachates were collected from a regional landfill of intermediate age (5 – 10 years); the characterization considered the measurement of the following parameters: pH, content of organic matter (chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5)), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and volatile fatty acids (VFAs); content of solids (total (TS) and volatile (TVS)), suspended solids (total (TSS) and volatile (VSS)); inorganic macro-components (conductivity; total and bicarbonate alkalinity; total, calcium and magnesium hardness; calcium; magnesium; chlorides; sulfates; total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia and organic; nitrates and orthophosphates); metals and metalloids (Fe, Mn, Cd, Pb, Ni, Al) and xenobiotics (phenols, HAPs and BTX - benzene, toluene and xylene), according to the techniques established in APHA et al. (2012).

Taking into account that one of the main toxic agents present in the leachates is ammonia nitrogen (Saucedo et al., 2007; Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013) and that the toxicity is due to the non-ionized form (free ammonia or NH3), Equation (1) (Anthonisen et al., 1976) was used to relate sample pH, room temperature and ammonia nitrogen concentration.

 

(1)

 

Here, Kb /Kw is the ratio between the dissociation constants of ammonia and water with respect to the temperature (ºC) of the medium, which is equivalent to e^ (6,344/273 + °C).

Toxicity tests

Two types of studies were performed: acute toxicity assays, or ecotoxicity tests, and anaerobic toxicity assays by specific methanogenic activity (SMA) tests.

Toxicity tests with Daphnia pulex: In the ecotoxicity tests, Daphnia pulex was used as an indicator organism, establishing concentration responses under controlled conditions according to APHA et al. (2012) and using lethal concentration (LC50) as an evaluation parameter, expressed as toxic units (TU). Five concentrations were used, each one in triplicate, exposing 10 newborns less than 24 hours after birth in each test vessel (Figure 1) for a period of 48 hours. The newborns were obtained from adult females previously selected and isolated in 1-L glass aquariums, with enough provision of nutrients and dilution water.

Figure 1. Mounting procedure of the toxicity bioassay with Daphnia pulex.

In addition, the concentration corresponding to the LC50 obtained from the sensitivity test with the reference toxic compound K2Cr2O7, a positive control, at 24 h, and the blank test or negative control prepared with reconstituted water were included (Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013). When the adequate ranges were obtained, several bioassays were performed, which allowed for calculating the LC50 expressed in TUs for the leachate, where TUs are toxic units calculated according to the following Equation (2) (Pivato and Gaspari, 2006).

 

(2)

 

To analyze and to interpret the obtained results, PROBIT software version 1.5 was used, implemented by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 1990). In addition, from the obtained LC50 values, a statistical correlation analysis of these results was performed with the physicochemical characteristics of the leachates, using the Pearson correlation coefficient for the data that complied with the normality assumption and using the Spearman coefficient for the parameters that did not comply with the normality assumption, to measure the degree of association of the data.

Anaerobic toxicity tests: To perform the tests, the liquid volume displacement method was used in 500-mL reactors operated at a temperature of 30 ± 2°C in a special conditioned room with temperature control. (Figure 2) shows the experimental setup for the toxicity tests.

Inoculum: The inoculum was obtained from a UASB reactor from an industrial wastewater treatment plant with a concentration of TSS of 48,4 g L-1 and of VSS of 40,3 g L -1 (VSS/TSS 0.83), a stability of 30 mL CH4 g-1 VSS-1 d-1 and an SMA of 0,45 and 0,40 g CODCH4 g-1 VSS-1 d-1. The inoculum concentration for the tests was 1,5 g VSS L-1.

Substrate: The substrate was the leachate collected from an intermediate-age municipal landfill, and two solutions of VFAs were used with mixtures of acetate:propionate:butyrate (C2:C3:C4) in proportions of 55:30:15 and 73:23:4 (Torres et al., 2010) and were added in an equivalent concentration of 4000 g L-1 COD. The tests consisted of an exposure stage (first feed) and a recovery stage (second feed), performed in triplicate. For the analysis, the values of the replicates were averaged. In the exposure stage, the treatments were fed with VFAs, macro- and micronutrients, and leachates; and in the recovery stage, only with VFAs and macro- and micronutrients (Torres et al., 2010). Table 1 presents the added concentrations of substrate and VFAs in each reactor.

 

Figure 2. Anaerobic toxicity experimental set-up with the leachate.

 

 

Table 1. Characteristics of the leachate toxicity tests

 

Reactor

VFA COD
(g L
-1)

Leachate COD
(g L
-1)

Total COD
(COD
VFA + CODLEACHATE) (g L-1)

Control

4,0

0,000

4,000

Treatments

4,0

6,190

10,190

 

By recording the methane volumes accumulated over time, the SMA of each reactor was determined, and the ratio between the SMA of the treatment and the control Equation (3) and the inhibition percentage Equation (4) were calculated.

 

(3)

 

(4)

 

Results and Discussion

Leachate characterization

Table 2 shows the physicochemical characteristics of the leachate. In general, it presents characteristics of an intermediate-age leachate with an age of 5 to 10 years (Renou et al., 2008; Shouliang et al., 2008 and Torres et al., 2014).

 

Table 2. Physicochemical characterization of the leachate

 

Parameter

Range

Standard
of discharge

pH

7,55

8,49

6,00 to 9,00*

Organic matter

COD (mg L-1)

3,673

6,638

2,000*

DOC (mg L-1)

1,240

5,196

BOD5 (mg L-1)

496

1,957

BOD5/ DOC

0,14

0,32

VFAs (meq L-1)

13

100

Solids

TS (mg L-1)

10,596

17,950

TVS (mg L-1)

2,390

8,134

TSS (mg L-1)

80

393

400*

VSS (mg L-1)

25

217

TDS (mg L-1)

10,473

17,775

Macro-inorganic components

Conductivity (mS cm-1)

16,2

25,2

Total alkalinity (mg L-1 CaCO3)

4,626

12,042

200**

HCO3- alkalinity (mg L-1 CaCO3)

4,518

10,746

Total hardness (mg L-1 CaCO3)

866

1,862

Calcium hardness (mg L-1 CaCO3)

265

625

Magnesium hardness (mg L-1 CaCO3)

337

1,470

Ca2+ (mg L-1)

106

250

Mg2+ (mg L-1)

95,1

357

Chloride Cl- (mg L-1)

1,398

3,099

500*

Sulfates SO4 = (mg L-1)

<2,7

218

600*

TKN (mg L-1)

1,204

2,072

NH3 − N (mg L-1)

728

1,848

NH3 (mg L-1)

33,5

204

NH4 + (mg L-1)

597

1,503

Norg (mg L-1)

28

1,232

NO3-N (mg L-1)

134,6

325,2

Orthophosphates (mg L-1)

8,4

31,7

Metals and metalloids

Fe (mg L-1)

5,783

Mn (mg L-1)

0,397

Cd (mg L-1)

<0,041

0,05*

Pb (mg L-1)

<0,053

0,20*

Ni (mg L-1)

0,287

0,300

0,50*

Zn (mg L-1)

0,307

0,406

3,00*

Al (mg L-1)

<0,644

3,00*

Xenobiotics

Phenols (mg L-1)

0,023

6,68

0,20*

BTEX (mg L-1)

<0,0001

HAPs (mg L-1)

<0,0001

*Art 14 Resolution 0631 (2015) that rule the Decree 3930 (2010)

**Art 7 Resolution 2115 (2007)

The alkaline pH (7,55-8,49) is related to the high content of bicarbonates and low content of VFAs. Because the landfill is of intermediate age, it is beginning or is in the methanogenic stage, transforming the VFAs into methane and carbon dioxide (Renou et al., 2008; Kheradmand et al., 2010; Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013). However, although the content of organic matter, expressed as COD, is high, the BOD5/COD ratio is low, which indicates the decreased biodegradability of the leachates with age and coincides with what has been found by authors including Fátima et al. (2012) and Ramírez–Sosa et al., (2013).

Regarding solids, the predominance of dissolved solids (DS) is observed, which indicates that the chemical components are dissolved as ions and salts. According to Rivera et al., (2013), in addition to conductivity, hardness and alkalinity indicate the presence of ions in the leachate in the form of dissolved salts composed of calcium, magnesium, chlorides, orthophosphates, sulfates, carbonates and bicarbonates, which are also related to the DS content.

Some inorganic matter is composed of nitrogen, with ammonia nitrogen in the greatest proportion, as the deamination of the amino acids and the destruction of organic compounds occurs first (Kulikowska and Klimiuk, 2008 and Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013). With time, nitrates start to increase by the stabilization of the cells, and ammonia nitrogen content decreases (Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013) due to the oxidation process. As with heavy metals and alkalinity, nitrogen compounds present in leachates have been widely studied because they are related to the generation of potentially inhibitory or toxic effects (Olivero et al., 2008; Pablos et al., 2011).

Regarding metals, metalloids and xenobiotic compounds, there is no quantifiable presence of heavy metals, BTX or HAPs, possible because the residues come from domestic wastes that contain low levels of these contaminants and because the dissolution processes, precipitation, adsorption, dilution, volatilization and other factors influence the landfill (Kulikouska and Klimuiuk, 2008 and Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013). In some cases, the phenol content exceeds the maximum permissible limit, which suggests the need to control this parameter to prevent it from negatively affecting the environment.

In general, characteristics of leachate indicate that it should not be discharged into water bodies without previous treatment because it represents a risk for aquatic ecosystems.

Toxicity tests

Toxicity tests with Daphnia pulex: The results obtained in the toxicity tests with Daphnia pulex are shown in Table 3.

The LC50 (2,02% V/V) and TU (49,5%) values are inversely proportional and indicate that the leachate is toxic to the evaluated indicator species, even at a low concentration of leachate, which is in agreement with Rivera-Laguna et al. (2013) for an intermediate leachate (TU 47.7)

 

Table 3. Data obtained for the toxicity tests with Daphnia pulex

Results

Value

Number of bioassays

21

Average LC50 (%V/V)

2,02

Average TU (%)

49,5

Standard deviation

0,30

CV (%)

15

 

Toxicity values can be associated with the content of organic (Isidori et al., 2003) or inorganic (hardness, conductivity, alkalinity and chlorides) matter (Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013). In this case, even though the studied leachate has a high concentration of ammonia nitrogen, the predominant form is the ammonium species NH4+, which cannot be associated with toxicity. Ammonia (which is the non-ionized form) is the toxic form because it permeates easily through biological membranes due to its high solubility in lipids, causing damage to the respiratory surface (Rivera-Laguna et al., 2013).

Statistical Analysis – Correlation analysis: Table 4 shows the results of the correlations of the LC50 with the physicochemical characteristics of the leachates, obtained by determining the Pearson coefficient for the parameters that comply with the assumption of normality and the nonparametric Spearman coefficient for the parameters that do not comply with the assumption of normality.

The results show that the leachate toxicity can be mainly attributed to the content of inorganic matter, expressed in terms of chlorides content (correlation coefficient: -0,886), calcium hardness and calcium content (correlation coefficient: -0,783). This agrees with the findings of Isidori et al. (2003), who found that divalent cations affect leachate toxicity, and with Öman et al. (2008), who found that high concentrations of chlorides are dangerous for freshwater organisms, including Daphnia pulex.

The results of the ecotoxicity tests and the correlation analysis performed confirm that leachate cannot be discharged into water sources without previous treatment because it can alter and affect aquatic ecosystems.

Toxicity test with anaerobic bacteria: (Figure 3) and Table 5 show the results of the toxicity tests. These results show that in the exposure to the toxic compound (leachate) stage, there was greater bacterial activity than in the control, while in the recovery stage (without the toxic compound), there was an inhibition, represented by the decrease of the SMA.

Even though the behavior was similar in both of the evaluated cases, with different C2:C3:C4 ratios of VFAs, the inhibition percentages varied, showing the importance of knowing the composition of leachates in terms of VFA type because they influence anaerobic biodegradability degree due to their complexity (Field, 1995).

 

Table 4. Correlation results of the leachate toxicity with the physicochemical parameters using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients

 

Parameter

Normality test

Correlation Coefficient

Shapiro-wilks – p-value

Coefficient

P-value

LC50

0,128

pH

0,487

-0,365

0,421

Total alkalinity

0,056

0,357

0,432 *

VFAs

0,618

0,066

0,888

COD

0,293

0,546

0,205

BOD5

0,002

0,286

0,535 *

TKN

0,219

0,007

0,988

NH3-N

0,609

0,739

0,058

NH3

0,378

0,046

0,922

NH4+

0,247

0,741

0,057

N-Norg

0,026

-0,541

0,210 *

Conductivity

0,810

0,571

0,181

Total hardness

0,378

0,254

0,582

Calcium hardness

0,284

-0,783

0,037

Magnesium hardness

0,224

0,368

0,417

Ca+2

0,277

-0,783

0,037

Mg+2

0,220

0,367

0,417

TS

0,583

0,313

0,494

TVS

0,548

0,309

0,500

TSS

0,0002

0,071

0,879 *

VSS

0,0001

-0,179

0,702 *

TDS

0,898

0,304

0,508

LC50

0,068

Chloride

0,404

-0,886

0,0188 *

NO3-N

0,182

0,464

0,3542 *

PO43-

0,021

0,257

0,6228 *

* The Spearman correlation coefficient was used due to the failure to comply with the normality assumption for LC50 or some of the physicochemical parameters. In the remainder of the tests, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used.

 

The observed SMA decrease during the recovery stage can most likely be attributed to two factors: i) the treatment with the toxic compound (leachate) had a greater amount of organic matter than the control one (treatment: 10,190 g COD L-1, control: 4 g COD L-1) and provided a greater amount of substrate for the bacterial community, allowing a greater production of methane; ii) the bacteria adapted to the substrate in the exposure stage, which allowed the degradation of the organic matter, leading to population growth and thus to greater methane production activity (Fernández et al., 2002 and Chen et al., 2008). In the recovery stage, the bacterial population had less access to organic matter, which could provoke competition for the substrate and a possible self-destruction process in the bacteria, which was reflected in their inhibition.

 

Figure 3. Curves of methane production in the exposure and recovery stages for the two studied treatments.

 

 

Table 5. Results obtained in the anaerobic toxicity test for the two treatments.

Test

Sample

Vfa ratio C2:C3:C4

Exposure stage

Recovery stage

SMA

%
SMA

%
Inhibition

SAM

%
SMA

%
Inhibition

1

Control

55:30:15

0,336

128

No
Inhibition

0,514

88

12

Treatment

0,431

0,454

2

Control

73:23:04

0,352

153

No
Inhibition

0,458

73

27

Treatment

0,539

0,336

 

It is emphasized that, although UT are very high, indicating high toxicity of the leaching, the anaerobic bacteria are capable of adapting the leaching to such a point that in the recovery stage produce quantities of methane similar to control. Thus, in the stage of exposure, the anaerobic organisms were able to transform the organic matter, which is reflected in the behavior of the methane production curves of the treatments, in which an adaptation of the sludge to the leachate was presented and, therefore, a higher production of methane compared to the controls. In the recovery stage, it is observed that the sludge was not affected by the leachate, producing almost the same amount of methane as the control.

It is also observed that the adaptation time of the sludge to the leachate in the exposure stage was 200 hours, which is equivalent approximately to 8 days. On the other hand, in the recovery stage, the adaptation time is lower, close to 90 hours, which is equivalent to approximately 4 days, when methane production starts, achieving a similar production to that of the control. This indicates that in more precise experiments and, on a larger scale, a greater biodegradability of the leachate could be achieved because the sludge adapted to the waste, showing no inhibition and achieving almost the same methane production of the control with smaller adaptation times.

These results show the treatment potential of the evaluated leachate by anaerobic processes because the microorganisms manage to adapt to this substrate.

 

Conclusions

The physicochemical characteristics of the leachate, the results of the toxicity tests with Daphnia pulex and the correlation analyses performed show that the leachates are toxic by an aquatic mechanism, with 49,5 % TU and the leachate inorganic fraction (mainly chlorides, calcium hardness and calcium) being the parameters that are most associated with its toxicity.

 

Thus, this type of waste should not be directly discharged into surface or underground waters, as it would affect the fauna, flora and ecosystems that exist in these waters.

 

The anaerobic toxicity assays showed the potential of this process for the treatment of the evaluated leachates because the methanogenic bacteria easily adapt to the supplied substrate. These results suggest the need to evaluate this anaerobic treatment at a greater scale to determine the adequate design and operation conditions of the system.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Valle for financing the Project “Evaluation of the municipal landfills age influence on the composition and toxicity of the leachates”.

 

References

Al-Wabel, M., Yehya, W., Farraj, A., Maghraby, S. (2011). Characteristics of landfill leachates and bio-solids of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 10 (2), 65–70.

Anthonisen, A., Loehr, R., Prakasam, T. (1976). Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous-acid. Journal water pollution control federation, 48 (5), 835-852.

APHA, AWWA, WEF, American Public Health Association. (2012).Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington DC., USA.

Asselman, J., Janssen, C., Smagghe, G., DeE Schamphelaeres, K. (2014). Ecotoxicity of binary mixtures of Microcystis aeruginosa and insecticides to Daphnia pulex. Environmental Pollution, 188, 56-63.

Atwater, J; Jasper, S; Mavinic, D; Koch, F. (1983). Experiments using Daphnia to measure landfill leachate toxicity. Water Research, 17 (12), 1855-1861.

Aziz, S., Aziz, H., Yusoff, M., Bashir, M., Umar, M. (2010). Leachate characterization in semi-aerobic and anaerobic sanitary landfills: A comparative study. Journal Environmental Management, 91 (12), 2608-2614.

Barata, C., Baird, D., Nogueira, A., Soares, A., Riva, M. (2006). Toxicity of binary mixtures of metals and pyrethroid insecticides of Daphnia magna Straus. Implications for multi-substance risks assessment. Aquatic Toxicology, 78 (1), 1-14.

Boumechhour, F., Rabah, K., Lamine, C., Said, B. (2013). Treatment of landfill leachate using Fenton process and coagulation/flocculation. Water Environmental Journal, 27 (1), 114-119.

Chen, Y., Cheng, J., Creamer, K. (2008). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology, 99 (10), 4044-4064.

Cho, E., Tameda, K., Hanashima, M., Yamada, T., HIGUCHI, S. (2009). Toxicological evaluation of the chemical oxidation methods for landfill stabilization. Waste Management, 29 (3), 1006-1011.

El-Fadel, M., Bou-Zeid, E., Chahine, W., Alayli, B. (2002). Temporal variation of leachate quality from pre-sorted and baled municipal solid waste with high organic and moisture content. Waste Management, 22 (3), 269-282.

Eriksson, O., Bisaillon, M. (2011). Multiple system modelling of waste management. Waste Management, 31 (12), 2620-2630.

Fátima, D., Tavares, L., Magalhães, F., Pereira, C., Souza, C., TavareS, A. (2012). Caracterização e percepção ambiental dos resíduos sólidos urbanos nas diferentes classes sociais no município de alfenas – MG. Agronegócios e Meio Ambiente, 5, 25-49.

Fernández, G., Vázquez, E., Martínez, P. (2002). Inhibidores del proceso anaerobio: compuestos utilizados en porcicultura. Ingeniería, 6 (3), 67-71.

Field, J., Medición de parámetros, manual de arranque y operación de Sistemas de Flujo Ascendente con manto de lodo– UASB, Universidad del Valle, CVC, Universidad Agrícola de Wageningen, Colombia, 1995.

Gallegos, M., Celis, L., Razo, E. (2010). Competencia por sustrato durante el desarrollo de biomasa sulfatorreductora a partir de un lodo metanogénico en un reactor UASB. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 26 (2), 109–117.

Hoornweg, D., Bhada-Tata, P., What a waste: A global review of solid waste management, Urban Development and Local Government Unit - World Bank, Washington D.C., 2012.

Isidori, M., Lavorgna, M., Nardelli, A., Parrella, A. (2003). Toxicity identification evaluation of leachates from municipal solid waste landfills: a multispecies approach. Chemosphere, 52 (1), 85–94.

Jemec, A., tišler, T., Žgajnar-Gotvajn, A. (2012). Assessment of landfill leachate toxicity reduction after biological treatment. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 62 (2), 210-221.

JING, Z., Hu, Y., Niu, Q., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, X. (2013). UASB performance and electron competition between methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in treating sulfate-rich wastewater containing ethanol and acetate. Bioresource Technology, 137, 349–357.

Kheradmand, S., Karimi-Jashni, A., Sartaj, M. (2010). Treatment of municipal landfill leachate using a combined anaerobic digester and activated sludge system. Waste Management, 30 (6), 1025–1031.

Kulikowska, D., Klimiuk, E. (2008). The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition. Bioresource Technology, 99 (13), 5981–5985.

Lee, A.H., Nikraz, H., Hung, Y.T. (2010). Influence of Waste Age on Landfill Leachate Quality. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 1 (4), 347-350.

Kjeldsen, P., Barlaz, M., Rooker, A., Baun, A., Ledin, A., Christensen, T. (2002). Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 32 (4), 297-336.

Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A., Darvishsefat, A., Zienalyan, M. (2010). Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Management, 30 (5), 912-920.

Olivero, J., Padilla, C., De la Rosa, O. (2008). Relationships between physicochemical parameters and the toxicity of leachates from a municipal solid waste landfill. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 70 (2), 294–299.

Öman, C., Junestedt, C. (2008). Chemical characterization of landfill leachates- 400 parameters and compounds. Waste Management, 28 (10), 1876-1891.

Pablos, M., Maritini, F., Fernández, C., BABIN, M., Herraez, I., Miranda, J., Martínez, J., Carbonell, G., Garcia, P., Tarazona, J. (2011). Correlation between physicochemical and ecotoxicological approaches to estimate landfill leachates toxicity. Waste Management, 31 (18), 1841–1847.

Pivato, A., Gaspari, L. (2006). Acute toxicity test of leachates from traditional and sustainable Landfills using luminescent bacteria. Waste Management, 26 (10), 1148–1155.

Ramírez-Sosa, D., Castillo-Borges, E., Méndez-Novelo, R., Sauri-Riancho, M., Barceló-Quintal, M., Marrufo-Gómez, J. (2013). Determination of organic compounds in landfill leachates treated by Fenton–Adsorption. Waste Management, 33 (2), 390-395.

Renou, S., Givaudan, J.G., Poulain, S., DIRASSOUYAN, F., MOULIN, P. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150 (3), 468–493.

Ribé, V., Nehrenheim, E., Odlare, M., Gustavsson, L., Berglind, R., Forsberg, Å. (2012). Ecotoxicological assessment and evaluation of a pine bark biosorbent treatment of five landfill leachates. Waste Management, 32 (10), 1886-1894.

Rivera-Laguna, E., Barba, L., Torres, P. (2013). Determinación de la toxicidad de lixiviados provenientes de residuos sólidos urbanos mediante indicadores biológicos. Afinidad, LXX (563), 183-188.

Romero, C. (2010). Aprovechamiento integral de lixiviados (PhD thesis, Ingeniería Química, Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Textil). Universidad de Salamanca.

Saucedo, G., Piña, O., Rodríguez, R., Cruz, Y. Degradación y estabilización acelerada de residuos sólidos urbanos (RSU) por tratamientos aerobios y anaerobios. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, Casa abierta al campo, México, 2007.

Shouliang, H., Beidou, X., Haichan, Y., Liansheng, H., Shilei, F., Hongliang, L. (2008). Characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in leachate with different landfill ages. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20 (4), 492-498.

Silva, J., Torrejón, G., Bay-Schmith, E., Larrain, A. (2003). Calibración del Bioensayo de Toxicidad aguda con Daphnia pulex (Crustáceo: Cladócera) usando un toxico de referencia. Gayana, 67 (1), 87-96.

SSPD. Estudio Sectorial de Aseo 2006-2009. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios, Imprenta Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia. 2010.

Tisler, T., Zagorc-Koncan, J. (1997). Comparative Assessment or Toxicity of Phenol, Formaldehyde, and Industrial Wastewater to Aquatic. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 97, 315-322.

Torres-Lozada, P., Barba-Ho, L.E, Rodríguez-victoria, J.A, Marmolejo-Rebellon, L.F., Pizarro-Loaiza, C.A (2010). Influencia de la incorporación de lixiviados sobre la biodegradabilidad anaerobia de aguas residuales domésticas. Revista Ingeniería e Investigación, 30 (1), 75 – 79.

Torres, P., Barba, L., Ojeda, C., Martínez, J., Castaño, Y. (2014). Influencia de la edad de lixiviados sobre su composición físico-química y su potencial de toxicidad. Revista U.D.C.A. Actualidad y Divulgación Científica, 17 (1), 245-255.

USEPA – UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organism. Fourth Edition. Report 600/4-90/027F, USA, 1990.

Wiszniowski, J., Robert, D., Surmacz-Gorska, J., Miksch, K., Weber, J. (2006). Landfill leachate treatment methods: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 4 (1), 51-61.

 

 

Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Share - Adapt

References

Al-Wabel, M., Yehya, W., Farraj, A., Maghraby, S. (2011). Charac-teristics of landfill leachates and bio-solids of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 10 (2), 65–70.

Anthonisen, A., Loehr, R., Prakasam, T. (1976). Inhibition of nitrifica-tion by ammonia and nitrous-acid. Journal water pollution con-trol federation, 48 (5), 835-852.

APHA, AWWA, WEF, American Public Health Association. (2012).Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington DC., USA.

Asselman, J., Janssen, C., Smagghe, G., DeE Schamphelaeres, K. (2014). Ecotoxicity of binary mixtures of Microcystis aeruginosa and insecticides to Daphnia pulex. Environmental Pollution, 188, 56-63.

Atwater, J; Jasper, S; Mavinic, D; Koch, F. (1983). Experiments using Daphnia to measure landfill leachate toxicity. Water Re-search, 17 (12), 1855-1861.

Aziz, S., Aziz, H., Yusoff, M., Bashir, M., Umar, M. (2010). Leachate characterization in semi-aerobic and anaerobic sanitary land-fills: A comparative study. Journal Environmental Management, 91 (12), 2608-2614.

Barata, C., Baird, D., Nogueira, A., Soares, A., Riva, M. (2006). Toxicity of binary mixtures of metals and pyrethroid insecticides of Daphnia magna Straus. Implications for multi-substance risks assessment. Aquatic Toxicology, 78 (1), 1-14.

Boumechhour, F., Rabah, K., Lamine, C., Said, B. (2013). Treatment of landfill leachate using Fenton process and coagula-tion/flocculation. Water Environmental Journal, 27 (1), 114-119.

Chen, Y., Cheng, J., Creamer, K. (2008). Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresource Technology, 99 (10), 4044-4064.

Cho, E., Tameda, K., Hanashima, M., Yamada, T., HIGUCHI, S. (2009). Toxicological evaluation of the chemical oxidation methods for landfill stabilization. Waste Management, 29 (3), 1006-1011.

El-Fadel, M., Bou-Zeid, E., Chahine, W., Alayli, B. (2002). Temporal variation of leachate quality from pre-sorted and baled munic-ipal solid waste with high organic and moisture content. Waste Management, 22 (3), 269-282.

Eriksson, O., Bisaillon, M. (2011). Multiple system modelling of waste management. Waste Management, 31 (12), 2620-2630.

Fátima, D., Tavares, L., Magalhães, F., Pereira, C., Souza, C., Tava-reS, A. (2012). Caracterização e percepção ambiental dos re-síduos sólidos urbanos nas diferentes classes sociais no municí-pio de alfenas – MG. Agronegócios e Meio Ambiente, 5, 25-49.

Fernández, G., Vázquez, E., Martínez, P. (2002). Inhibidores del proceso anaerobio: compuestos utilizados en porcicultura. In-geniería, 6 (3), 67-71.

Field, J., Medición de parámetros, manual de arranque y opera-ción de Sistemas de Flujo Ascendente con manto de lodo– UASB, Universidad del Valle, CVC, Universidad Agrícola de Wageningen, Colombia, 1995.

Gallegos, M., Celis, L., Razo, E. (2010). Competencia por sustrato durante el desarrollo de biomasa sulfatorreductora a partir de un lodo metanogénico en un reactor UASB. Revista Internac-ional de Contaminación Ambiental, 26 (2), 109–117.

Hoornweg, D., Bhada-Tata, P., What a waste: A global review of solid waste management, Urban Development and Local Gov-ernment Unit - World Bank, Washington D.C., 2012.

Isidori, M., Lavorgna, M., Nardelli, A., Parrella, A. (2003). Toxicity identification evaluation of leachates from municipal solid waste landfills: a multispecies approach. Chemosphere, 52 (1), 85–94.

Jemec, A., tišler, T., Žgajnar-Gotvajn, A. (2012). Assessment of landfill leachate toxicity reduction after biological treatment. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 62 (2), 210-221.

JING, Z., Hu, Y., Niu, Q., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, X. (2013). UASB perfor-mance and electron competition between methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in treating sulfate-rich wastewater containing ethanol and acetate. Biore-source Technology, 137, 349–357.

Kheradmand, S., Karimi-Jashni, A., Sartaj, M. (2010). Treatment of municipal landfill leachate using a combined anaerobic di-gester and activated sludge system. Waste Management, 30 (6), 1025–1031.

Kulikowska, D., Klimiuk, E. (2008). The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition. Bioresource Technology, 99 (13), 5981–5985.

Lee, A.H., Nikraz, H., Hung, Y.T. (2010). Influence of Waste Age on Landfill Leachate Quality. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 1 (4), 347-350.

Kjeldsen, P., Barlaz, M., Rooker, A., Baun, A., Ledin, A., Christensen, T. (2002). Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 32 (4), 297-336.

Moeinaddini, M., Khorasani, N., Danehkar, A., Darvishsefat, A., Zienalyan, M. (2010). Siting MSW landfill using weighted linear combination and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method-ology in GIS environment (case study: Karaj). Waste Manage-ment, 30 (5), 912-920.

Olivero, J., Padilla, C., De la Rosa, O. (2008). Relationships be-tween physicochemical parameters and the toxicity of leacha-tes from a municipal solid waste landfill. Ecotoxicology and Envi-ronmental Safety, 70 (2), 294–299.

Öman, C., Junestedt, C. (2008). Chemical characterization of landfill leachates- 400 parameters and compounds. Waste Ma-nagement, 28 (10), 1876-1891.

Pablos, M., Maritini, F., Fernández, C., BABIN, M., Herraez, I., Miran-da, J., Martínez, J., Carbonell, G., Garcia, P., Tarazona, J. (2011). Correlation between physicochemical and ecotoxicological approaches to estimate landfill leachates toxicity. Waste Man-agement, 31 (18), 1841–1847.

Pivato, A., Gaspari, L. (2006). Acute toxicity test of leachates from traditional and sustainable Landfills using luminescent bacteria. Waste Management, 26 (10), 1148–1155.

Ramírez-Sosa, D., Castillo-Borges, E., Méndez-Novelo, R., Sauri-Riancho, M., Barceló-Quintal, M., Marrufo-Gómez, J. (2013). De-termination of organic compounds in landfill leachates treated by Fenton–Adsorption. Waste Management, 33 (2), 390-395.

Renou, S., Givaudan, J.G., Poulain, S., DIRASSOUYAN, F., MOULIN, P. (2008). Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150 (3), 468–493.

Ribé, V., Nehrenheim, E., Odlare, M., Gustavsson, L., Berglind, R., Forsberg, Å. (2012). Ecotoxicological assessment and evaluation of a pine bark biosorbent treatment of five landfill leachates. Waste Management, 32 (10), 1886-1894.

Rivera-Laguna, E., Barba, L., Torres, P. (2013). Determinación de la toxicidad de lixiviados provenientes de residuos sólidos urbanos mediante indicadores biológicos. Afinidad, LXX (563), 183-188.

Romero, C. (2010). Aprovechamiento integral de lixiviados (PhD thesis, Ingeniería Química, Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Textil). Universidad de Salamanca.

Saucedo, G., Piña, O., Rodríguez, R., Cruz, Y. Degradación y estabilización acelerada de residuos sólidos urbanos (RSU) por tratamientos aerobios y anaerobios. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa, Casa abierta al campo, Mé-xico, 2007.

Shouliang, H., Beidou, X., Haichan, Y., Liansheng, H., Shilei, F., Hongliang, L. (2008). Characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in leachate with different landfill ages. Journal of Envi-ronmental Sciences, 20 (4), 492-498.

Silva, J., Torrejón, G., Bay-Schmith, E., Larrain, A. (2003). Calibra-ción del Bioensayo de Toxicidad aguda con Daphnia pulex (Crustáceo: Cladócera) usando un toxico de referencia. Ga-yana, 67 (1), 87-96.

SSPD. Estudio Sectorial de Aseo 2006-2009. Superintendencia de Servicios Públicos Domiciliarios, Imprenta Nacional, Bogotá, Colombia. 2010.

Tisler, T., Zagorc-Koncan, J. (1997). Comparative Assessment or Toxicity of Phenol, Formaldehyde, and Industrial Wastewater to Aquatic. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 97, 315-322.

Torres-Lozada, P., Barba-Ho, L.E, Rodríguez-victoria, J.A, Marmole-jo-Rebellon, L.F., Pizarro-Loaiza, C.A (2010). Influencia de la in-corporación de lixiviados sobre la biodegradabilidad anaero-bia de aguas residuales domésticas. Revista Ingeniería e Inves-tigación, 30 (1), 75 – 79.

Torres, P., Barba, L., Ojeda, C., Martínez, J., Castaño, Y. (2014). Influencia de la edad de lixiviados sobre su composición físico-química y su potencial de toxicidad. Revista U.D.C.A. Actuali-dad y Divulgación Científica, 17 (1), 245-255.

USEPA – UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and re-ceiving waters to freshwater and marine organism. Fourth Edi-tion. Report 600/4-90/027F, USA, 1990.

Wiszniowski, J., Robert, D., Surmacz-Gorska, J., Miksch, K., Weber, J. (2006). Landfill leachate treatment methods: A review. Envi-ronmental Chemistry Letters, 4 (1), 51-61.

How to Cite

APA

Torres Lozada, P., Carabalí Rivera, Y. S. and Barba Ho, L. E. (2017). Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays. Ingeniería e Investigación, 37(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220

ACM

[1]
Torres Lozada, P., Carabalí Rivera, Y.S. and Barba Ho, L.E. 2017. Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays. Ingeniería e Investigación. 37, 1 (Jan. 2017), 16–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220.

ACS

(1)
Torres Lozada, P.; Carabalí Rivera, Y. S.; Barba Ho, L. E. Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays. Ing. Inv. 2017, 37, 16-24.

ABNT

TORRES LOZADA, P.; CARABALÍ RIVERA, Y. S.; BARBA HO, L. E. Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays. Ingeniería e Investigación, [S. l.], v. 37, n. 1, p. 16–24, 2017. DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/54220. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Chicago

Torres Lozada, Patricia, Yazmín Stefhany Carabalí Rivera, and Luz Edith Barba Ho. 2017. “Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays”. Ingeniería E Investigación 37 (1):16-24. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220.

Harvard

Torres Lozada, P., Carabalí Rivera, Y. S. and Barba Ho, L. E. (2017) “Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays”, Ingeniería e Investigación, 37(1), pp. 16–24. doi: 10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220.

IEEE

[1]
P. Torres Lozada, Y. S. Carabalí Rivera, and L. E. Barba Ho, “Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays”, Ing. Inv., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 16–24, Jan. 2017.

MLA

Torres Lozada, P., Y. S. Carabalí Rivera, and L. E. Barba Ho. “Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays”. Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 37, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 16-24, doi:10.15446/ing.investig.v37n1.54220.

Turabian

Torres Lozada, Patricia, Yazmín Stefhany Carabalí Rivera, and Luz Edith Barba Ho. “Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays”. Ingeniería e Investigación 37, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 16–24. Accessed November 21, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/54220.

Vancouver

1.
Torres Lozada P, Carabalí Rivera YS, Barba Ho LE. Determination of leachate toxicity through acute toxicity using Daphnia pulex and anaerobic toxicity assays. Ing. Inv. [Internet]. 2017 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];37(1):16-24. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/54220

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations4

1. Luciana Regaldo, Ulises Reno, Natalí Romero, Antonio Avilés, Roberto T. Abdala Díaz, Wanda Polla, Ana María Gagneten. (2020). Removal of Toxic Pollutants Through Microbiological and Tertiary Treatment. , p.179. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821014-7.00006-X.

2. Elisângela Maria da Silva, Naiara Angelo Gomes, Samanda Costa do Nascimento, Breno Moura de Araújo Nóbrega, Márcio Camargo de Melo, Veruschka Escarião Dessoles Monteiro. (2022). Ecotoxicological responses of Daphnia magna and Eisenia andrei in landfill leachate. Ecotoxicology, 31(8), p.1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-022-02587-7.

3. Patricia Torres Lozada, Yazmin Carabalí Rivera, Luz Edith Barba Ho. (2019). Evaluation of toxicity from leachate lagoons sediments, using the toxicity leaching procedure - TCLP and acute toxicity tests. DYNA, 86(208), p.192. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v86n208.75348.

4. Aria Norouzi, Eris Uygar, Zalihe Nalbantoglu. (2022). A review on the effects of landfill leachate on the physical and mechanical properties of compacted clay liners for municipality landfills. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(12) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10430-w.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

1174

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)