Published

2023-05-13

Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment

Evaluación de la influencia de las configuraciones convencional e híbrida de tanque séptico-filtro anaerobio sobre la hidrodinámica y desempeño del tratamiento de aguas residuales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.94617

Keywords:

anaerobic digestion, anaerobic filter, decentralized wastewater treatment, hydrodynamic performance, septic tank (en)
digestión anaerobia, filtro anaerobio, tratamiento descentralizado de aguas residuales, comportamiento hidrodinámico, tanque séptico (es)

Downloads

Authors

Decentralized treatment is an adequate strategy to more sustainably treat municipal wastewater in rural and peri-urban areas. In light of the above, this study evaluated, on a pilot scale, the performance of an anaerobic configuration consisting of a septic tank (ST) and an anaerobic filter (AF) in two modalities: (i) a conventional system (CS) in separate reactors and (ii) a hybrid system (HS) with a ST and an AF in a single reactor –both with theoretical hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of 36, 30, 24, and 18 hours. The results indicated that the HS had a better performance (less variability) under the different conditions evaluated, achieving, at an HRT of 18 hours, higher reduction efficiencies (52,0±16,8% COD and 73,06±18,5% TSS) compared to the CS (39,8±13,1% COD and 65,8±20,52% TSS). Although hydrodynamic analysis showed dual flow (full mix and plug flow) in both configurations, the HS exhibited a greater predominance of plug flow (62%) than the CS (52%), which allowed the former to reach a real HRT closer to the theoretical value than the latter (23/24 vs. 19/24 hours). This behavior guarantees the lowest occurrence of dead zones and short circuits, as well as a higher Persson hydraulic efficiency (0,62) and lower area requirements for the HS in comparison with the CS (0,5).

El tratamiento descentralizado es una estrategia adecuada para tratar las aguas residuales municipales en áreas rurales y periurbanas de manera más sostenible. Con base en esto, este estudio evaluó, a escala piloto, el desempeño de una configuración anaerobia conformada por un tanque séptico (TS) y un filtro anaerobio (FA) en dos modalidades: (i) un sistema convencional (SC) en reactores separados y (ii) un sistema híbrido (SH) con TS y FA en un solo reactor –ambos con tiempos teóricos de retención hidráulica (TRH) de 36, 30, 24 y 18 horas. Los resultados indicaron que el SH presentó un mejor desempeño (menor variabilidad) bajo las diferentes condiciones evaluadas, logrando, a un TRH de 18 horas, mayores eficiencias de reducción (52,0±16,8 % DQO y 73,06±18,5 % SST) en comparación con el SC (39,8±13,1 % DQO y 65,8±20,52 % SST). Aunque el análisis hidrodinámico mostró flujo dual (mezcla completa y flujo pistón) en ambas configuraciones, el SH presentó mayor predominio del flujo pistón (62 %) que el SC (52 %), lo que permitió que el primero alcanzara un TRH real más cercano al valor teórico que el segundo (23/24 vs. 19/24 horas). Este comportamiento garantiza la menor ocurrencia de zonas muertas y cortocircuitos, así como una mayor eficiencia hidráulica de Persson (0,62) y menores requerimientos de área para el SH en comparación con el SC (0,5).

References

APHA, AWWA, and WEF (2012). Standard methods for exami-nation of water and wastewater (22nd ed.). American Wa-ter Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Water Environment Federation.

Baettker, E. C. (2015). Avaliação do desempenho de filtros anaeróbios preenchidos com diferentes meios suportes no tratamento de água residuária sintética [Master's tesis, Uni-versidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná]. https://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/2744

Balasundaram, N., Meenambal, T., Balasubramanium, N., and Loganath, R. (2014). Comparative study of different media in the treatment of sago wastewater using HUASB reactor. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 13(3), 511-516. https://neptjournal.com/upload-images/NL-49-12-(10)B-3010Com.pdf

Bouted, C., and Ratanatamskul C. (2018). Effects of tempera-ture and HRT on performance of a novel insulated anaero-bic filter (IAF) system incorporated with the waste heat input for building wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 698-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.071

Bureau of Safe Drinking Water (2016). Wastewater operator certification training. Module 1: Introduction to wastewater treatment, unit 2 – Characteristics of wastewater. Depart-ment of Environmental Protection. https://cutt.ly/Az0dfix

Chernicharo, C. A. L. (2007). Biological wastewater treatment series. Volume 4. Anaerobic reactors (1st ed.). IWA Publish-ing.

Dorji U., Dorji P., Shon H., Badeti U., Dorji C., Wangmo C., Tijing L., Kandasamy J., Vigneswaran S., Chanan A., and Phuntsho S. (2022). On-site domestic wastewater treatment system using shredded waste plastic bottles as biofilter me-dia: Pilot-scale study on effluent standards in Bhutan. Che-mosphere, 286(2), 131729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131729

Fernandez del Castillo A, Verduzco-Garibay M, Sénes-Guerrero, C, Orozco-Nunnelly D.A., de Anda J., and Gradi-lla-Hernandez M.S. (2022). A review of the sustainability of anaerobic reactors combined with constructed wetlands for decentralized wastewater treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133428

Garrido-Aranda, J. M., Oyanedel, V. and Méndez, R. (2003). Nuevos biorreactores híbridos para el tratamiento de aguas residuales. Ingeniería Química, 401, 171-178. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=623582

Hassanvand-Jamadi, M., and Alighardashi, A. (2017). Appli-cation of Froude dynamic similitude in anaerobic baffled reactors to prediction of hydrodynamic characteristics of a prototype reactor using a model reactor. Water Science and Engineering, 10(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2017.03.002

Latrach, L., Ouazzani, N., Hejjaj, A., Zouhir, F., Mahi, M., Masunaga, T., and Mandi, L. (2018). Optimization of hydrau-lic efficiency and wastewater treatment performances using a new design of vertical flow Multi-Soil-Layering (MSL) tech-nology. Ecological Engineering, 117, 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.04.003

Levenspiel, O. (2004). Ingeniería de las reacciones químicas (2nd ed.). Reverté, S.A..

Lew, B., Lustig, I., Beliavski, M., Tarre, S., and Green, M. (2011). An integrated UASB-sludge digester system for raw domestic wastewater treatment in temperate climates. Bioresource Technology, 102(7), 4921-4924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.030

Li, S., Nan, J., and Gao, F. (2016). Hydraulic characteristics and performance modeling of a modified anaerobic baf-fled reactor (MABR). Chemical Engineering Journal, 284, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.129

Méndez-Novelo R. I., Chan-Gutiérrez, E. A., Castillo-Borges, E. R., Vázquez-Borges, E. R., and Espadas-Solís, A. E. (2012). Digestión anaerobia de efluentes de fosas sépticas. Ingenie-ría, Investigación y Tecnología, 13(3), 339-349. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-77432012000300008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fi.25940732e.2012.13n3.032

Munavalli, G. R., Sonavane, P. G., Koli, M. M., and Dhaman-gaokar, B. S. (2022). Field-scale decentralized domestic wastewater treatment system: Effect of dynamic loading conditions on the removal of organic carbon and nitrogen. Journal of Environmental Management, 302(Part A), 114014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114014

Nasr, F. A., and Mikhaeil, B. (2013). Treatment of domestic wastewater using conventional and baffled septic tanks. Environmental Technology, 34(16), 2337-2343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.767285

Oliveira, S. C., and von Sperling, M. (2008). Reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 42(4-5), 1182-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.001

Orozco-Gaviria, C. A., Triviño-Cabrera, C. C., and Manrique-Losada, L. (2014). Arranque de un reactor UASB para el tra-tamiento de aguas residuales domésticas en condiciones andino amazónicas. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, 10(2), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.328

Pacheco, J., and Magaña, A. (2003). Arranque de un reactor anaerobio. Ingeniería, 7(1), 21-25. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/467/46770102.pdf

Pérez-Vidal, A., and Torres-Lozada, P. (2008). Evaluación del comportamiento hidrodinámico como herramienta para optimización de reactores anaerobios de crecimiento en medio fijo. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 45, 27-40. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-62302008000300003

Pérez-Vidal, A., Torres-Lozada, P. and Silva-Leal, J. (2009). Tratamiento anaerobio de las aguas residuales del proceso de extracción de almidón de yuca. Optimización de varia-bles ambientales y operacionales. DYNA, 76(160), 139-148. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/dyna/v76n160/a13v76n160.pdf

Persson, J., Somes, N. L., and Wong, T. H. F. (1999). Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds. Water sci-ence and technology, 40(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00448-5

Sabry, T. (2010). Evaluation of decentralized treatment of sewage employing Upflow Septic Tank/Baffled Reactor (USBR) in developing countries. Journal of Hazardous Mate-rials, 174(1-3), 500-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.080

Santiago-Díaz, Á. L., García-Albortante, J., and Salazar-Peláez, M. L. (2019) UASB-septic tank as an alternative for decentralized wastewater treatment in Mexico. Environmen-tal Technology, 40(14), 1780-1792. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2018.1430170

Santiago‐Díaz, Á. L., Benítez‐Olivares, G., Salazar‐Peláez, M. L., de los Cobos Vasconcelos, D., and Mugica‐Álvarez, V. (2021). Comprehensive analysis of a zeolite‐packed upflow baffled septic tank using tracer tests and mathematical modelling. Water and Environment Journal, 36(2), 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12740

Sharma, M. K., Khursheed, A., and Kazmi, A. A. (2014). Modi-fied septic tank-anaerobic filter unit as a two-stage onsite domestic wastewater treatment system. Environmental Tech-nology, 35(17-20), 2183-2193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.896950

Sharma, M. K., and Kazmi, A. A. (2015). Anaerobic onsite treatment of black water using filter-based packaged system as an alternative of conventional septic tank. Ecological Engineering, 75, 457-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.12.014

Singh. S. P., Sharma, M. K., and Gaur, R. C. (2022). Effects of aqwise carrier media and brick media as filter materials on performance of biofilm reactor. Materials Today: Proceed-ings, 60(Part 1), 782-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.486

Soroa del Campo, S., Lopetegui-Garnika, J., Almandoz-Peraita, A., and García de las Heras, J. L. (2005). Diseño de reactores híbridos anaerobios para el tratamiento de aguas residuales industriales. Revista Tecnología del Agua, 267, 60-67. http://www.bibliotecagbs.com/archivos/ta_267_1_05.pdf

Sousa V. P., and Chernicharo, C. A. L. (2005). Sistema com-pacto de tratamento de esgostos domiciliares composto de tanque séptico modificado e reatores anaeróbios Híbri-dos operando em série [Conference presentation]. 23° Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, Campo Grande, Brasil. https://acortar.link/xT2KfT

Stazi, V., and Tommei, M. C. (2018). Enhancing anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater: State of the art, innova-tive technologies and future perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.071

United Nations Sustainable Development (2019). Water and sanitation. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/

van Haandel, A., Kato, M., Cavalcanti, P., and Florencio, L. (2006). Anaerobic reactor design concepts for the treatment of domestic wastewater. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 5, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-005-4888-y

Vicuña, E., Ara, L., and Loayza, J. (2009). Sistemas híbridos de tratamiento de aguas residuales. Revista Peruana de Quími-ca e Ingeniería Química, 12(1), 10-17. https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/quim/article/view/4953

von Sperling, M., and Chernicharo, C. A. (2005). Biological wastewater treatment in warm climate regions – Volume 1 (1st ed.). IWA Publishing.

How to Cite

APA

Arias Henao, M., Paredes Cuervo, D. & Torres Lozada, P. (2023). Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment. Ingeniería e Investigación, 43(2), e94617. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.94617

ACM

[1]
Arias Henao, M., Paredes Cuervo, D. and Torres Lozada, P. 2023. Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment. Ingeniería e Investigación. 43, 2 (Feb. 2023), e94617. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.94617.

ACS

(1)
Arias Henao, M.; Paredes Cuervo, D.; Torres Lozada, P. Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment. Ing. Inv. 2023, 43, e94617.

ABNT

ARIAS HENAO, M.; PAREDES CUERVO, D.; TORRES LOZADA, P. Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment. Ingeniería e Investigación, [S. l.], v. 43, n. 2, p. e94617, 2023. DOI: 10.15446/ing.investig.94617. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/94617. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Arias Henao, Maricel, Diego Paredes Cuervo, and Patricia Torres Lozada. 2023. “Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment”. Ingeniería E Investigación 43 (2):e94617. https://doi.org/10.15446/ing.investig.94617.

Harvard

Arias Henao, M., Paredes Cuervo, D. and Torres Lozada, P. (2023) “Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment”, Ingeniería e Investigación, 43(2), p. e94617. doi: 10.15446/ing.investig.94617.

IEEE

[1]
M. Arias Henao, D. Paredes Cuervo, and P. Torres Lozada, “Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment”, Ing. Inv., vol. 43, no. 2, p. e94617, Feb. 2023.

MLA

Arias Henao, M., D. Paredes Cuervo, and P. Torres Lozada. “Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment”. Ingeniería e Investigación, vol. 43, no. 2, Feb. 2023, p. e94617, doi:10.15446/ing.investig.94617.

Turabian

Arias Henao, Maricel, Diego Paredes Cuervo, and Patricia Torres Lozada. “Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment”. Ingeniería e Investigación 43, no. 2 (February 8, 2023): e94617. Accessed March 13, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/94617.

Vancouver

1.
Arias Henao M, Paredes Cuervo D, Torres Lozada P. Influence of Conventional and Hybrid Septic Tank-Anaerobic Filter Configurations on the Hydrodynamics and Performance of Wastewater Treatment. Ing. Inv. [Internet]. 2023 Feb. 8 [cited 2026 Mar. 13];43(2):e94617. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/94617

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

975

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)