Validación de un método multirresiduo para la determinación de medicamentos veterinarios en trucha y langostino
Validation of a multiresidue method for the determination of veterinary drugs in rainbow trout and shrimp
Validação de um método de multiresíduos para la determinação o medicamentos veterinários em truta e camarão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.quim.v51n2.101096Palabras clave:
multirresiduos, residuos de medicamentos veterinarios, UPLC-MS/MS, truchas, langostinos (es)Veterinary drug residues, UPLC/MS/MS, rainbow trouts, shrimps, multi-waste (en)
multi-resíduos, resíduos de medicamentos veterinários, UPLC-MS/MS, truta, camarão (pt)
Este estudio se realizó con el objetivo de desarrollar y validar un método para la determinación de 30 medicamentos veterinarios en muestras de trucha y langostino. El método utiliza extracción en fase sólida dispersiva (dSPE) con C18 y detección por cromatografía líquida acoplada a espectrometría de masas. Se determinó linealidad, veracidad (porcentaje de recuperación), repetitividad y reproducibilidad intralaboratorio (porcentaje de desviación estándar relativa (% RSD)), límites de detección (LoD), límites de cuantificación (LoQ), selectividad e incertidumbre. La recuperación varió de 70 a 120% y la repetibilidad y la reproducibilidad fueron menores de 20% de la desviación estándar relativa. La selectividad fue adecuada, sin picos interferentes. Las relaciones iónicas cumplieron con los criterios de confirmación. Los coeficientes de determinación (R2) fueron mayores de 0,99, con excepción de la sulfaquinoxalina en langostino (R2 = 0,97). Los LoD y los LoQ variaron entre 0,6 µg/kg y 12,8 µg/kg y los valores de incertidumbre entre 6 µg/kg y 49 µg/kg. Se analizaron adicionalmente 6 muestras de diferentes mercados de Lima y se detectaron trazas de algunos medicamentos incluidos en el ensayo. El método es adecuado para el análisis de residuos de medicamentos veterinarios y se recomienda su aplicación en los programas nacionales de monitoreo de la inocuidad de truchas y langostinos provenientes de acuicultura.
The study was aimed at developing and validate an analysis method to determine residues of 30 veterinary drugs in rainbow trout and shrimp specimens. The method involves extraction in dispersive solid phase with C18 and the subsequent detection through liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Validation was done through determination of linearity, trueness (% of recovery), repeatability and intralaboratory reproducibility, limits of detection (LoD), limits of quantification (LoQ) selectivity and uncertainty. Recovery ranged from 70 to 120% and repeatability and intralaboratory reproducibility were lower than 20%. Selectivity was adequate, without interference peaks. Likewise, the ionic relationships met the confirmation criteria. The linearity was adequate, with determination coefficients (R2) above 0.99, except for sulfaquinolaxin in shrimp specimens (R2 = 0,97). LoD and LoQ varied from 0,6 µg/kg to 12,8 µg/kg. Limits of uncertainty ranged from 6 µg/kg to 49 µg/kg. The method was used to analyze 6 samples from different markets in Lima (Peru), identifying traces of some drugs included in the study. Our results show that the method is adequate for the analysis of veterinary drug residues and allow us to recommend its application in national monitoring programs, to assess the safety of rainbow trout and shrimp specimens from aquaculture.
The study was aimed at developing and validate an analysis method to determine residues of 30 veterinary drugs in rainbow trout and shrimp specimens. The method involves extraction in dispersive solid phase with C18 and the subsequent detection through liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Validation was done through determination of linearity, trueness (% of recovery), repeatability and intralaboratory reproducibility, limits of detection (LoD), limits of quantification (LoQ) selectivity and uncertainty. Recovery ranged from 70 to 120% and repeatability and intralaboratory reproducibility were lower than 20%. Selectivity was adequate, without interference peaks. Likewise, the ionic relationships met the confirmation criteria. The linearity was adequate, with determination coefficients (R2) above 0.99, except for sulfaquinolaxin in shrimp specimens (R2 = 0,97). LoD and LoQ varied from 0,6 µg/kg to 12,8 µg/kg. Limits of uncertainty ranged from 6 µg/kg to 49 µg/kg. The method was used to analyze 6 samples from different markets in Lima (Peru), identifying traces of some drugs included in the study. Our results show that the method is adequate for the analysis of veterinary drug residues and allow us to recommend its application in national monitoring programs, to assess the safety of rainbow trout and shrimp specimens from aquaculture.
Descargas
Citas
Fondo de las Naciones para la Alimentación y la Agricultura, “El estado mundial de la pesca y la acuicultura 2020. La sostenibilidad en acción”, 2020. https://www.fao.org/3/ca9229es/ca9229es.pdf. [Último acceso: 07 03 2022].
P. van der Sleen et al., “Interannual temperature variability is a principal driver of low-frequency fluctuations in marine fish populations”, Commun. Biol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02960-y
ComexPerú-Sociedad de Comercio Exterior del Perú, “Exportaciones acuícolas crecieron un 25,3% en el período enero-octubre de 2021”, 2022. https://www.comexperu.org.pe/articulo/exportaciones-acuicolas-crecieron-un-253-en-el-periodo-enero-octubre-de-2021. (Último acceso: 08 03 2022).
D. Schar, E. Klein, R. Laxminarayan, M. Gilbert, and T. Van Boeckel, “Global trends in antimicrobial use in aquaculture”, Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2020. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-78849-3.
F. M. Treiber and H. Beranek-Knauer, “Antimicrobial residues in food from animal origin—A review of the literature focusing on products collected in stores and markets worldwide”, Antibiotics, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-15, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10050534.
D. Schar, C. Zhao, Y. Wang, D. G. J. Larsson, M. Gilbert, and T. P. Van Boeckel, “Twenty-year trends in antimicrobial resistance from aquaculture and fisheries in Asia”, Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2021. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25655-8. PMID: 34508079.
Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, “Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21 Food and Drugs. Part 556. Tolerances For Residues Of New Animal Drugs In Food”, 2022. https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=45a74e7727c3e71d2325986fd8064238&mc=true&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title21/21cfr556_main_02.tpl. [Último acceso: 15 02 2022].
H. N. Jung, D. H. Park, J. Y. Choi, S. H. Kang, H. J. Cho, J. M. Choi, J. H. Shim, A. A. Zaky, A. M. Abd El-Aty, and H. C. Shin, “Simultaneous Quantification of Chloramphenicol, Thiamphenicol, Florfenicol, and Florfenicol Amine in Animal and Aquaculture Products Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry”, Front. Nutr., vol. 8, no. 812803, pp. 1-10, 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.812803.
T. J. Centner and L. Petetin, “Divergent Approaches Regulating Beta Agonists and Cloning of Animals for Food: USA and European Union”, Society & Animals, vol. 28, no. 5-6 pp. 613-32, 2020. DOI:10.1163/15685306-12341567.
Fondo de las Naciones para la Alimentación y la Agricultura-Organización Mundial de la Salud, “Codex Alimentarius. CX/MRL 2-2018. Límites Máximos de Residuos (LMR) y recomendaciones sobre la gestión de riesgos (RGR) para residuos de medicamentos veterinarios en los alimentos”, 2018. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/es/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXM%2B2%252FMRL2s.pdf. [Último acceso: 15 02 2022].
Official Journal of the European Union. “Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808 on the performance of analytical methods for residues of pharmacologically active substances used in food-producing animals and on the interpretation of results as well as on the methods to be used for sampling and repealing Decisions 2002/657/EC and 98/179/EC”, 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32021R0808. [Último acceso: 08 03 2022].
FDA Foods Program Regulatory Science Steering Committee, “Guidelines for the Validation of Chemical Methods in Food, Feed, Cosmetics, and Veterinary Products”, Fda.gov, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/media/81810/download. [Ultimo acceso: 08 03 2022].
Fondo de las Naciones para la Alimentación y la Agricultura-Organización Mundial de la Salud, “CAC/GL 71-2009. Adoptadas en 2009. Revisadas en 2012, 2014. Directrices para el diseño y la implementación de programas nacionales reglamentarios de aseguramiento de inocuidad alimentaria relacionados con el uso de medicamentos veterinarios en los animales destinados a la producción de alimentos”, 2014. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/livestockgov/documents/CXG_071s.pdf. [Último acceso: 15 02 2022].
S. Dugheri, N. Mucci, G. Cappelli, L. Trevisani, A. Bonari, E. Bucaletti, D. Squillaci, and G. Arcangeli, “Advanced Solid-Phase Microextraction Techniques and Related Automation: A Review of Commercially Available Technologies”, J. Anal. Methods Chem., vol. 2022, pp.1-15, 2022. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8690569.
B. Magnusson and U. Örnemark, “The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods – A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics”, 2014. ISBN 978-91-87461-59-0. www.eurachem.org. [Último acceso: 15 02 2022].
International Organization for Standardization / International Electrotechnical Commission, “ISO/IEC GUIDE 98-3:2008. Uncertainty of measurement — Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995)”, 1995. https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/4230450/8389141/ISO_IEC_Guide_98%2D3_2008%28E%29_%2D_Uncertainty_of_measurement_%2D%2D_Part_3%2C_Guide_to_the_expression_of_uncertainty_in_measurement_%28GUM%2C1995%29.pdf?nodeid=8389142&vernum=-2. [Último acceso: 15 02 2022].
S. L. R. Ellison and A. Williams, “EURACHEM/CITAC Guide. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement”, 2012. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/QUAM2012_P1.pdf. [Último acceso: 15 02 2022].
C. Cháfer-Pericás, Á. Maquieira, R. Puchades, B. Company, J. Miralles, and A. Moreno, “Multiresidue determination of antibiotics in feed and fish samples for food safety evaluation. Comparison of immunoassay vs LC-MS-MS”, Aquac. Res., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 993-99, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.12.008.
A. Juan-García, G. Font, and Y. Picó, “Simultaneous determination of different classes of antibiotics in fish and livestock by CE-MS”, Electrophoresis, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 4180-91, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/elps.200700383.
M. E. Dasenaki and N. S. Thomaidis, “Multi-residue determination of seventeen sulfonamides and five tetracyclines in fish tissue using a multi-stage LC-ESI-MS/MS approach based on advanced mass spectrometric techniques”, Anal. Chim. Acta, vol. 672, no. 1-2, pp. 93-102, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.04.034. Epub 2010 Apr 24. PMID: 20579496.
R. Pereira Lopes, R. Cazorla Reyes, R. Romero-González, J. L. Martínez Vidal, and A. Garrido Frenich, “Multiresidue determination of veterinary drugs in aquaculture fish samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry”, J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., vol. 895-896, pp. 39-47, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.03.011.
B. Toussaint, M. Chedin, G. Bordin, and A. R. Rodriguez, “Determination of (fluoro)quinolone antibiotic residues in pig kidney using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: I. Laboratory-validated method”, J. Chromatogr. A., vol. 1088, no. 1-2, pp. 32-39, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.02.057.
M. P. Hermo, D. Barron, and J. Barbosa, “Determination of multiresidue quinolones regulated by the European Union in pig liver samples. High-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry versus tandem mass spectrometry detection”, J. Chromatogr. A., vol. 1201, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.090.
G. van Vyncht, A. Janosi, G. Bordin, B. Toussaint, G. Maghuin-Rogister, E. De Pauw, and A. R. Rodriguez, “Multiresidue determination of (fluoro)quinolone antibiotics in swine kidney using liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry”, J. Chromatogr. A., vol. 952, no. 1-2, pp.121-29, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00092-4.
P. Mottier, Y. A. Hammel, E. Gremaud, and P. A. Guy, “Quantitative high-throughput analysis of 16 (fluoro)quinolones in honey using automated extraction by turbulent flow chromatography coupled to liquid chromatograph- tandem mass spectrometry”, J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 35-43, 2008. DOI: 10.1021/jf072934d.
S. Bogialli, G. D’Ascenzo, A. Di Corcia, A. Lagana, and G. Tramontana, “Simple assay for monitoring seven quinolone antibacterials in eggs: Extraction with hot water and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry Laboratory validation in line with the European Union Commission Decision 657/2002/EC”, J. Chromatogr. A., vol. 1216, no. 5, pp. 794-780, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.11.070.
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Diego Chirinos Pajuelo, Orlando Lucas Aguirre, Wilfredo León Gonzales, Nathaly Elizabeth Hurtado Galindo, Estefania Morales Ochante, Luis Huicho, Maria Concepcion Rivera Chira

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons (CC. Atribución 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación en esta revista.
Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
